@article{SeegerLenhardWisniewski2021,
  author    = {Seeger, Jennifer and Lenhard, Wolfgang and Wisniewski, Katrin},
  title     = {Metakognitives Strategiewissen in sprachbezogenen Situationen : Interne Struktur und Validit{\"a}t des ScenEx},
  series = {Diagnostica},
  volume    = {67},
  journal   = {Diagnostica},
  number    = {4},
  issn      = {0012-1924},
  doi       = {10.1026/0012-1924/a000275},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-242375},
  pages     = {189-199},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Studieren stellt hohe Anforderungen an selbstregulatorische F{\"a}higkeiten und eigenverantwortlichen Umgang mit schwierigen Situationen. Aus den zus{\"a}tzlichen sprachlichen Barrieren f{\"u}r ausl{\"a}ndische Studierende erwachsen spezifische selbstregulatorische Aufgaben, wie der Umgang mit Verst{\"a}ndnisproblemen in Vorlesungen. Da hierf{\"u}r bisher kaum geeignete Erhebungsinstrumente existieren, versucht ScenEx diese L{\"u}cke zu schließen. Der Test erfasst das metakognitive Strategiewissen in sprachlich herausfordernden Situationen im Studienalltag. Anhand einer Stichprobe von 290 ausl{\"a}ndischen Studierenden im ersten Fachsemester wird die psychometrische Qualit{\"a}t und interne Struktur des Instruments {\"u}berpr{\"u}ft. ScenEx zeigt eine zufriedenstellende interne Konsistenz und gute Itemfit-Kennwerte, erwartungskonform liegen lokale stochastische Abh{\"a}ngigkeiten der Aufgaben innerhalb der Szenarien vor. Eine konfirmatorische Faktorenanalyse best{\"a}tigt die Grobstruktur der Szenarien und des Gesamtscores des Tests. Das Verfahren ist f{\"u}r die weitere Entwicklung der Sprachkompetenz {\"u}ber die anf{\"a}ngliche Sprachf{\"a}higkeit hinaus pr{\"a}diktiv. ScenEx erweist sich insgesamt als ein reliables und valides Instrument zur Erfassung des Strategiewissens in schwierigen Situationen im Studium.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{SusewindWalkowitz2020,
  author    = {Susewind, Moritz and Walkowitz, Gari},
  title     = {Symbolic Moral Self-Completion - Social Recognition of Prosocial Behavior Reduces Subsequent Moral Striving},
  series = {Frontiers in Psychology},
  volume    = {11},
  journal   = {Frontiers in Psychology},
  issn      = {1664-1078},
  doi       = {10.3389/fpsyg.2020.560188},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-211327},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {According to theories on moral balancing, a prosocial act can decrease people's motivation to engage in subsequent prosocial behavior, because people feel that they have already achieved a positive moral self-perception. However, there is also empirical evidence showing that people actually need to be recognized by others in order to establish and affirm their self-perception through their prosocial actions. Without social recognition, moral balancing could possibly fail. In this paper, we investigate in two laboratory experiments how social recognition of prosocial behavior influences subsequent moral striving. Building on self-completion theory, we hypothesize that social recognition of prosocial behavior (self-serving behavior) weakens (strengthens) subsequent moral striving. In Study 1, we show that a prosocial act leads to less subsequent helpfulness when it was socially recognized as compared to a situation without social recognition. Conversely, when a self-serving act is socially recognized, it encourages subsequent helpfulness. In Study 2, we replicate the effect of social recognition on moral striving in a more elaborated experimental setting and with a larger participant sample. We again find that a socially recognized prosocial act leads to less subsequent helpfulness compared to an unrecognized prosocial act. Our results shed new light on the boundary conditions of moral balancing effects and underscore the view that these effects can be conceptualized as a dynamic of self-completion.},
  language  = {en}
}