@phdthesis{Kappenberger2024, author = {Kappenberger, Jeannette Sarah}, title = {Biochemical characterization of the TFIIH translocase XPB from \(Chaetomium\) \(thermophilum\)}, doi = {10.25972/OPUS-24409}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-244096}, school = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg}, year = {2024}, abstract = {DNA repair and gene expression are two major cellular processes that are fundamental for the maintenance of biological life. Both processes require the enzymatic activity of the super family 2 helicase XBP, which is an integral subunit of the general transcription factor TFIIH. During transcription initiation, XPB catalyzes the initial melting of promoter DNA enabling RNA polymerase II to engage with the coding DNA strand and start gene transcription. In nucleotide excision repair, XPB acts in concert with the other TFIIH helicase XPD causing strand separation around a lesion site. Mutations within the genes encoding XPB or other TFIIH subunits are associated with different cancer types as well as with the autosomal recessive disorders Xeroderma Pigmentosum and trichothiodystrophy and rarely combined features of Xeroderma Pigmentosum and Cockayne syndrome. In the last few years, great progress has been made towards unraveling the structure of TFIIH and its individual subunits including XPB. These structural insights tremendously improved our understandings with respect to the molecular interactions within this intriguing protein complex. However, the underlying regulation mechanisms that functionally control XPB during transcription and repair remained largely elusive. We thus executed the biochemical characterization of this protein to investigate the functional network that regulates XPB within the scaffold of TFIIH. Due to their enhanced stability compared to the human proteins, we utilized the proteins that originate from the thermophilic fungus Chaetomium thermophilum for this purpose as a model organism for eukaryotic TFIIH. The present work provides novel insights into the enzymatic function and regulation of XPB. We could show that both, DNA and the TFIIH subunit p52 stimulate XPB's ATPase activity and that the p52-mediated activity is further boosted by p8, another subunit within TFIIH. Surprisingly, DNA can activate XPB's ATPase activity to a greater extent than its TFIIH interaction partners p52/p8, but when both, i.e. p52/p8 and DNA are present at the same time, p52 dominates the activation and the enzymatic speed is maintained at the level observed through the sole activation of p52/p8. We thus defined p52 as the master regulator of XPB that simultaneously activates and represses XPB's enzymatic activity. Based on a correlative mutagenesis study of the main interface between p52 and XPB that was set into context with recent structural data, a model for the p52-mediated activation and speed limitation of XPB's ATPase was proposed. The research on XPB's ATPase was expanded with the investigation of the inhibition mechanism of XPB's ATPase via the natural compound Triptolide. Furthermore, we investigated XPB's DNA translocase function and could observe that XPB can only perform its translocase movement when it is fully incorporated into core TFIIH and this translocase movement is further enhanced by the nucleotide excision repair factor XPA. Fluorescence polarization measurements with nucleotide analogues revealed that XPB displays the highest affinity towards DNA in the ADP + Pi bound state and its binding is weakened when ADP is bound or the nucleotide is dissociated from the enzyme, suggesting a movement on the DNA during the distinct states of the ATPase cycle. Finally, the well-known and highly conserved RED motif was found to be the crucial element in XPB to enable this translocase movement. Combined, the data presented in this work provide novel insights into the intricate regulation network that controls XPB's enzymatic activity within TFIIH and furthermore show that XPB's enzymatic activity is tightly controlled by various factors.}, subject = {DNS-Reparatur}, language = {en} } @phdthesis{Sauer2019, author = {Sauer, Markus}, title = {DHX36 function in RNA G-quadruplex-mediated posttranscriptional gene regulation}, doi = {10.25972/OPUS-18395}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-183954}, school = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg}, year = {2019}, abstract = {The expression of genetic information into proteins is a key aspect of life. The efficient and exact regulation of this process is essential for the cell to produce the correct amounts of these effector molecules to a given situation. For this purpose, eukaryotic cells have developed many different levels of transcriptional and posttranscriptional gene regulation. These mechanisms themselves heavily rely on interactions of proteins with associated nucleic acids. In the case of posttranscriptional gene regulation an orchestrated interplay between RNA-binding proteins, messenger RNAs (mRNA), and non-coding RNAs is compulsory to achieve this important function. A pivotal factor hereby are RNA secondary structures. One of the most stable and diverse representatives is the G-quadruplex structure (G4) implicated in many cellular mechanisms, such as mRNA processing and translation. In protein biosynthesis, G4s often act as obstacles but can also assist in this process. However, their presence has to be tightly regulated, a task which is often fulfilled by helicases. One of the best characterized G4-resolving factors is the DEAH-box protein DHX36. The in vitro function of this helicase is extensively described and individual reports aimed to address diverse cellular functions as well. Nevertheless, a comprehensive and systems-wide study on the function of this specific helicase was missing, so far. The here-presented doctoral thesis provides a detailed view on the global cellular function of DHX36. The binding sites of this helicase were defined in a transcriptome-wide manner, a consensus binding motif was deviated, and RNA targets as well as the effect this helicase exerts on them were examined. In human embryonic kidney cells, DHX36 is a mainly cytoplasmic protein preferentially binding to G-rich and G4-forming sequence motifs on more than 4,500 mRNAs. Loss of DHX36 leads to increased target mRNA levels whereas ribosome occupancy on and protein output of these transcripts are reduced. Furthermore, DHX36 knockout leads to higher RNA G4 levels and concomitant stress reactions in the cell. I hypothesize that, upon loss of this helicase, translationally-incompetent structured DHX36 target mRNAs, prone to localize in stress granules, accumulate in the cell. The cell reacts with basal stress to avoid cytotoxic effects produced by these mis-regulated and structured transcripts.}, subject = {RNS}, language = {en} } @phdthesis{Roth2011, author = {Roth, Heide Marie}, title = {Nucleotide Excision Repair: From Recognition to Incision of damaged DNA}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-57098}, school = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg}, year = {2011}, abstract = {The Nucleotide Excision Repair (NER) pathway is able to remove a vast diversity of structurally unrelated DNA lesions and is the only repair mechanism in humans responsible for the excision of UV induced DNA damages. The NER mechanism raises two fundamental questions: 1) How is DNA damage recognition achieved discriminating damaged from non damaged DNA? 2) How is DNA incision regulated preventing endonucleases to cleave DNA non specifically but induce and ensure dual incision of damaged DNA? Thus, the aim of this work was to investigate the mechanisms leading from recognition to incision of damaged DNA. To decipher the underlying process of damage recognition in a prokaryotic model system, the intention of the first part of this work was to co crystallize the helicase UvrB form Bacillus caldotenax together with a DNA substrate comprising a fluorescein adducted thymine as an NER substrate. Incision assays were performed to address the question whether UvrB in complex with the endonuclease UvrC is able to specifically incise damaged DNA employing DNA substrates with unpaired regions at different positions with respect to the DNA lesion. The results presented here indicate that the formation of a specific pre incision complex is independent of the damage sensor UvrA. The preference for 5' bubble substrate suggests that UvrB is able to slide along the DNA favorably in a 5' → 3' direction until it directly encounters a DNA damage on the translocating strand to then recruit the endonuclease UvrC. In the second part of this work, the novel endonuclease Bax1 from Thermoplasma acidophilum was characterized. Due to its close association to archaeal XPB, a potential involvement of Bax1 in archaeal NER has been postulated. Bax1 was shown to be a Mg2+ dependent, structure specific endonuclease incising 3' overhang substrates in the single stranded region close to the ssDNA/dsDNA junction. Site directed mutagenesis of conserved amino acids was employed to identify putative active site residues of Bax1. In complex with the helicase XPB, however, incision activity of Bax1 is altered regarding substrate specificity. The presence of two distinct XPB/Bax1 complexes with different endonuclease activities indicates that XPB regulates Bax1 incision activity providing insights into the physical and functional interactions of XPB and Bax1.}, subject = {DNS-Reparatur}, language = {en} } @phdthesis{Wolski2011, author = {Wolski, Stefanie Carola}, title = {Structural and functional characterization of nucleotide excision repair proteins}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-67183}, school = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg}, year = {2011}, abstract = {XPD is a 5'-3' helicase of the superfamily 2. As part of the transcription factor IIH it functions in transcription initiation and nucleotide excision repair. This work focus on the role of XPD in nucleotide excision repair. NER is a DNA repair pathway unique for its broad substrate range. In placental mammals NER is the only repair mechanism able to remove lesions induced by UV-light. NER can be divided into four different steps that are conserved between pro- and eukaryotes. Step 1 consists of the initial damage recognition, during step 2 the putative damage is verified, in step 3 the verified damage is excised and in the 4th and final step the resulting gap in the DNA is refilled. XPD was shown to be involved in the damage verification step. It was possible to solve the first apo XPD structure by a MAD approach using only the endogenous iron from the iron sulfur cluster. Based on the apo XPD structure several questions arise: where is DNA bound? Where is DNA separated? How is damage verification achieved? What is the role of the FeS cluster? These questions were addressed in this work. Hypothesis driven structure based functional mutagenesis was employed and combined with detailed biochemical characterization of the variants. The variants were analyzed by thermal unfolding studies to exclude the possibility that the overall stability could be affected by the point mutation. DNA binding assays, ATPase assays and helicase assays were performed to delineate amino acid residues important for DNA binding, helicase activity and damage recognition. A structure of XPD containing a four base pair DNA fragment was solved by molecular replacement. This structure displays the polarity of the translocated strand with respect to the helicase framework. Moreover the properties of the FeS cluster were studied by electron paramagnetic resonance to get insights into the role of the FeS cluster. Furthermore XPD from Ferroplasma acidarmanus was investigated since it was shown that it is stalled at CPD containing lesions. The data provide the first detailed insight into the translocation mechanism of a SF2B helicase and reveal how polarity is achieved. This provides a basis for further anlayses understanding the combined action of the helicase and the 4Fe4S cluster to accomplish damage verification within the NER cascade.}, subject = {DNS-Reparatur}, language = {en} }