@article{HaussmannSchmidtIllmannetal.2022,
  author    = {Haussmann, Alexander and Schmidt, Martina E. and Illmann, Mona L. and Schr{\"o}ter, Marleen and Hielscher, Thomas and Cramer, Holger and Maatouk, Imad and Horneber, Markus and Steindorf, Karen},
  title     = {Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on yoga, psychosocial, and mindfulness-based interventions for cancer-related fatigue: What intervention characteristics are related to higher efficacy?},
  series = {Cancers},
  volume    = {14},
  journal   = {Cancers},
  number    = {8},
  issn      = {2072-6694},
  doi       = {10.3390/cancers14082016},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-270753},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is a burdensome sequela of cancer treatments. Besides exercise, recommended therapies for CRF include yoga, psychosocial, and mindfulness-based interventions. However, interventions conducted vary widely, and not all show a significant effect. This meta-analysis aimed to explore intervention characteristics related to greater reductions in CRF. We included randomized controlled trials published before October 2021. Standardized mean differences were used to assess intervention efficacy for CRF and multimodel inference to explore intervention characteristics associated with higher efficacy. For the meta-analysis, we included 70 interventions (24 yoga interventions, 31 psychosocial interventions, and 15 mindfulness-based interventions) with 6387 participants. The results showed a significant effect of yoga, psychosocial, and mindfulness-based interventions on CRF but with high heterogeneity between studies. For yoga and mindfulness-based interventions, no particular intervention characteristic was identified to be advantageous for reducing CRF. Regarding psychosocial interventions, a group setting and work on cognition were related to higher intervention effects on CRF. The results of this meta-analysis suggest options to maximize the intervention effects of psychosocial interventions for CRF. The effects of yoga and mindfulness-based interventions for CRF appear to be independent of their design, although the limited number of studies points to the need for further research.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{ScharbatkeBehrensSchmalzingetal.2016,
  author    = {Scharbatke, Eva C. and Behrens, Frank and Schmalzing, Marc and Koehm, Michaela and Greger, Gerd and Gnann, Holger and Burkhardt, Harald and Tony, Hans-Peter},
  title     = {Association of improvement in pain with therapeutic response as determined by individual improvement criteria in patients with rheumatoid arthritis},
  series = {Arthritis Care \& Research},
  volume    = {68},
  journal   = {Arthritis Care \& Research},
  number    = {11},
  doi       = {10.1002/acr.22884},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-186817},
  pages     = {1607-1615},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Objective To use statistical methods to establish a threshold for individual response in patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Methods We used an analysis of variance model in patients on stable therapy (discovery cohort) to establish critical differences (d(crit)) for the minimum change associated with a significant individual patient response (beyond normal variation) in the PRO measures of pain (0-10), fatigue (0-10), and function (Funktionsfragebogen Hannover questionnaire; 0-100). We then evaluated PRO responses in patients initiating adalimumab in a noninterventional study (treatment cohort). Results In the discovery cohort (n=700), PROs showed excellent long-term retest reliability. The minimum change that exceeded random fluctuation was conservatively determined to be 3 points for pain, 4 points for fatigue, and 16 points for function. In the treatment cohort (n=2,788), 1,483 patients (53.2\%) achieved a significant individual therapeutic response as assessed by Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28)-d(crit) (1.8 points) after 12 months of adalimumab treatment; 68.5\% of patients with a DAS28-d(crit) response achieved a significant improvement in pain, whereas approximately 40\% achieved significant improvements in fatigue or function. Significant improvements in all 3 PROs occurred in 22.7\% of patients; 22.8\% did not have any significant PRO responses. In contrast, significant improvements in all 3 PROs occurred in only 4.4\% of 1,305 patients who did not achieve a DAS28-d(crit) response at month 12, and 59.1\% did not achieve any significant PRO responses. Conclusion The establishment of critical differences in PROs distinguishes true responses from random variation and provides insights into appropriate patient management.},
  language  = {en}
}