@article{SbirkovKwokBhamraetal.2017,
  author    = {Sbirkov, Yordan and Kwok, Colin and Bhamra, Amandeep and Thompson, Andrew J. and Gil, Veronica and Zelent, Arthur and Petrie, Kevin},
  title     = {Semi-quantitative mass spectrometry in AML cells identifies new non-genomic targets of the EZH2 methyltransferase},
  series = {International Journal of Molecular Sciences},
  volume    = {18},
  journal   = {International Journal of Molecular Sciences},
  number    = {7},
  issn      = {1422-0067},
  doi       = {10.3390/ijms18071440},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-285541},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {Alterations to the gene encoding the EZH2 (KMT6A) methyltransferase, including both gain-of-function and loss-of-function, have been linked to a variety of haematological malignancies and solid tumours, suggesting a complex, context-dependent role of this methyltransferase. The successful implementation of molecularly targeted therapies against EZH2 requires a greater understanding of the potential mechanisms by which EZH2 contributes to cancer. One aspect of this effort is the mapping of EZH2 partner proteins and cellular targets. To this end we performed affinity-purification mass spectrometry in the FAB-M2 HL-60 acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) cell line before and after all-trans retinoic acid-induced differentiation. These studies identified new EZH2 interaction partners and potential non-histone substrates for EZH2-mediated methylation. Our results suggest that EZH2 is involved in the regulation of translation through interactions with a number of RNA binding proteins and by methylating key components of protein synthesis such as eEF1A1. Given that deregulated mRNA translation is a frequent feature of cancer and that eEF1A1 is highly expressed in many human tumours, these findings present new possibilities for the therapeutic targeting of EZH2 in AML.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{HurdGruebelWojciechowskietal.2021,
  author    = {Hurd, Paul J. and Gr{\"u}bel, Kornelia and Wojciechowski, Marek and Maleszka, Ryszard and R{\"o}ssler, Wolfgang},
  title     = {Novel structure in the nuclei of honey bee brain neurons revealed by immunostaining},
  series = {Scientific Reports},
  volume    = {11},
  journal   = {Scientific Reports},
  doi       = {10.1038/s41598-021-86078-5},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-260059},
  pages     = {6852},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {In the course of a screen designed to produce antibodies (ABs) with affinity to proteins in the honey bee brain we found an interesting AB that detects a highly specific epitope predominantly in the nuclei of Kenyon cells (KCs). The observed staining pattern is unique, and its unfamiliarity indicates a novel previously unseen nuclear structure that does not colocalize with the cytoskeletal protein f-actin. A single rod-like assembly, 3.7-4.1 mu m long, is present in each nucleus of KCs in adult brains of worker bees and drones with the strongest immuno-labelling found in foraging bees. In brains of young queens, the labelling is more sporadic, and the rod-like structure appears to be shorter (similar to 2.1 mu m). No immunostaining is detectable in worker larvae. In pupal stage 5 during a peak of brain development only some occasional staining was identified. Although the cellular function of this unexpected structure has not been determined, the unusual distinctiveness of the revealed pattern suggests an unknown and potentially important protein assembly. One possibility is that this nuclear assembly is part of the KCs plasticity underlying the brain maturation in adult honey bees. Because no labelling with this AB is detectable in brains of the fly Drosophila melanogaster and the ant Camponotus floridanus, we tentatively named this antibody AmBNSab (Apis mellifera Brain Neurons Specific antibody). Here we report our results to make them accessible to a broader community and invite further research to unravel the biological role of this curious nuclear structure in the honey bee central brain.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{MaierhoferFlunkertDittrichetal.2017,
  author    = {Maierhofer, Anna and Flunkert, Julia and Dittrich, Marcus and M{\"u}ller, Tobias and Schindler, Detlev and Nanda, Indrajit and Haaf, Thomas},
  title     = {Analysis of global DNA methylation changes in primary human fibroblasts in the early phase following X-ray irradiation},
  series = {PLoS ONE},
  volume    = {12},
  journal   = {PLoS ONE},
  number    = {5},
  doi       = {10.1371/journal.pone.0177442},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-170895},
  pages     = {e0177442},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {Epigenetic alterations may contribute to the generation of cancer cells in a multi-step process of tumorigenesis following irradiation of normal body cells. Primary human fibroblasts with intact cell cycle checkpoints were used as a model to test whether X-ray irradiation with 2 and 4 Gray induces direct epigenetic effects (within the first cell cycle) in the exposed cells. ELISA-based fluorometric assays were consistent with slightly reduced global DNA methylation and hydroxymethylation, however the observed between-group differences were usually not significant. Similarly, bisulfite pyrosequencing of interspersed LINE-1 repeats and centromeric α-satellite DNA did not detect significant methylation differences between irradiated and non-irradiated cultures. Methylation of interspersed ALU repeats appeared to be slightly increased (one percentage point; p = 0.01) at 6 h after irradiation with 4 Gy. Single-cell analysis showed comparable variations in repeat methylation among individual cells in both irradiated and control cultures. Radiation-induced changes in global repeat methylation, if any, were much smaller than methylation variation between different fibroblast strains. Interestingly, α-satellite DNA methylation positively correlated with gestational age. Finally, 450K methylation arrays mainly targeting genes and CpG islands were used for global DNA methylation analysis. There were no detectable methylation differences in genic (promoter, 5' UTR, first exon, gene body, 3' UTR) and intergenic regions between irradiated and control fibroblast cultures. Although we cannot exclude minor effects, i.e. on individual CpG sites, collectively our data suggest that global DNA methylation remains rather stable in irradiated normal body cells in the early phase of DNA damage response.},
  language  = {en}
}