@phdthesis{Sommerlandt2017,
  author    = {Sommerlandt, Frank M. J.},
  title     = {Mechanisms of visual memory formation in bees: About immediate early genes and synaptic plasticity},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-136997},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {Animals form perceptual associations through processes of learning, and retain that information through mechanisms of memory. Honeybees and bumblebees are classic models for insect perception and learning, and despite their small brains with about one million neurons, they are organized in highly social colonies and possess an astonishing rich behavioral repertoire including navigation, communication and cognition. Honeybees are able to harvest hundreds of morphologically divergent flower types in a quick and efficient manner to gain nutrition and, back in the hive, communicate discovered food sources to nest mates. To accomplish such complex tasks, bees must be equipped with diverse sensory organs receptive to stimuli of different modalities and must be able to associatively learn and memorize the acquired information. Particularly color vision plays a prominent role, e.g. in navigation along landmarks and when bees identify inflorescences by their color signals. Once acquired, bees are known to retain visual information for days or even months. Numerous studies on visual perception and color vision have been conducted in the past decades and largely revealed the information processing pathways in the brain. In contrast, there are no data available on how the brain may change in the course of color learning experience and whether pathways differ for coarse and fine color learning. Although long-term memory (LTM) storage is assumed to generally include reorganization of the neuronal network, to date it is unclear where in the bee brain such changes occur in the course of color learning and whether visual memories are stored in one particular site or decentrally distributed over different brain domains. The present dissertation research aimed to dissect the visual memory trace in bees that is beyond mere stimulus processing and therefore two different approaches were elaborated: first, the application of immediate early genes (IEG) as genetic markers for neuronal activation to localize early processes underlying the formation of a stable LTM. Second, the analysis of late consequences of memory formation, including synaptic reorganization in central brain areas and dependencies of color discrimination complexity. Immediate early genes (IEG) are a group of rapidly and transiently expressed genes that are induced by various types of cellular stimulation. A great number of different IEGs are routinely used as markers for the localization of neuronal activation in vertebrate brains. The present dissertation research was dedicated to establish this approach for application in bees, with focus on the candidate genes Amjra and Amegr, which are orthologous to the two common vertebrate IEGs c-jun and egr-1. First the general requirement of gene transcription for visual LTM formation was proved. Bumblebees were trained in associative proboscis extension response (PER) conditioning to monochromatic light and subsequently injected with an inhibitor of gene transcription. Memory retention tests at different intervals revealed that gene transcription is not required for the formation of a mid-term memory, but for stable LTM. Next, the appliance of the candidate genes was validated. Honeybees were exposed to stimulation with either alarm pheromone or a light pulse, followed by qPCR analysis of gene expression. Both genes differed in their expression response to sensory exposure: Amjra was upregulated in all analyzed brain parts (antennal lobes, optic lobes and mushroom bodies, MB), independent from stimulus modality, suggesting the gene as a genetic marker for unspecific general arousal. In contrast, Amegr was not significantly affected by mere sensory exposure. Therefore, the relevance of associative learning on Amegr expression was assessed. Honeybees were trained in visual PER conditioning followed by a qPCR-based analysis of the expression of all three Amegr isoforms at different intervals after conditioning. No learning-dependent alteration of gene expression was observed. However, the presence of AmEgr protein in virtually all cerebral cell nuclei was validated by immunofluorescence staining. The most prominent immune-reactivity was detected in MB calyx neurons. Analysis of task-dependent neuronal correlates underlying visual long-term memory was conducted in free-flying honeybees confronted with either absolute conditioning to one of two perceptually similar colors or differential conditioning with both colors. Subsequent presentation of the two colors in non-rewarded discrimination tests revealed that only bees trained with differential conditioning preferred the previously learned color. In contrast, bees of the absolute conditioning group chose randomly among color stimuli. To investigate whether the observed difference in memory acquisition is also reflected at the level of synaptic microcircuits, so called microglomeruli (MG), within the visual domains of the MB calyces, MG distribution was quantified by whole-mount immunostaining three days following conditioning. Although learning-dependent differences in neuroarchitecture were absent, a significant correlation between learning performance and MG density was observed. Taken together, this dissertation research provides fundamental work on the potential use of IEGs as markers for neuronal activation and promotes future research approaches combining behaviorally relevant color learning tests in bees with examination of the neuroarchitecture to pave the way for unraveling the visual memory trace.},
  subject      = {Biene},
  language  = {en}
}