@article{VogtKollikowskiWeidneretal.2022,
  author    = {Vogt, Marius L. and Kollikowski, Alexander M. and Weidner, Franziska and Strinitz, Marc and Feick, J{\"o}rn and Essig, Fabian and Neugebauer, Herrmann and Haeusler, Karl Georg and Pham, Mirko and Maerz, Alexander},
  title     = {Safety and Effectiveness of the New Generation APERIO® Hybrid Stent-retriever Device in Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke},
  series = {Clinical Neuroradiology},
  volume    = {32},
  journal   = {Clinical Neuroradiology},
  number    = {1},
  doi       = {10.1007/s00062-021-01122-1},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-264817},
  pages     = {141-151},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Background It is unknown whether technological advancement of stent-retriever devices influences typical observational indicators of safety or effectiveness. Methods Observational retrospective study of APERIO® (AP) vs. new generation APERIO® Hybrid (APH) (Acandis®, Pforzheim, Germany) stent-retriever device (01/2019-09/2020) for mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke. Primary effectiveness endpoint was successful recanalization eTICI (expanded Thrombolysis In Cerebral Ischemia) ≥ 2b67, primary safety endpoint was occurrence of hemorrhagic complications after MT. Secondary outcome measures were time from groin puncture to first pass and successful reperfusion, and the total number of passes needed to achieve the final recanalization result. Results A total of 298 patients with LVO stroke who were treated by MT matched the inclusion criteria: 148 patients (49.7\%) treated with AP vs. 150 patients (50.3\%) treated with new generation APH. Successful recanalization was not statistically different between both groups: 75.7\% for AP vs. 79.3\% for APH; p = 0.450. Postinterventional hemorrhagic complications and particularly subarachnoid hemorrhage as the entity possibly associated with stent-retriever device type was significantly less frequent in the group treated with the APH: 29.7\% for AP and 16.0\% for APH; p = 0.005; however, rates of symptomatic hemorrhage with clinical deterioration and in domo mortality were not statistically different. Neither the median number of stent-retriever passages needed to achieve final recanalization, time from groin puncture to first pass, time from groin puncture to final recanalization nor the number of cases in which successful recanalization could only be achieved by using a different stent-retriever as bail-out device differed between both groups. Conclusion In the specific example of the APERIO® stent-retriever device, we observed that further technological developments of the new generation device were not associated with disadvantages with respect to typical observational indicators of safety or effectiveness.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{HerzbergDornTrummetal.2022,
  author    = {Herzberg, Moriz and Dorn, Franziska and Trumm, Christoph and Kellert, Lars and Tiedt, Steffen and Feil, Katharina and K{\"u}pper, Clemens and Wollenweber, Frank and Liebig, Thomas and Zimmermann, Hanna},
  title     = {Middle cerebral artery M2 thrombectomy: safety and technical considerations in the German Stroke Registry (GSR)},
  series = {Journal of Clinical Medicine},
  volume    = {11},
  journal   = {Journal of Clinical Medicine},
  number    = {15},
  issn      = {2077-0383},
  doi       = {10.3390/jcm11154619},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-286052},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {There is ongoing debate concerning the safety and efficacy of various mechanical thrombectomy (MT) approaches for M2 occlusions. We compared these for MT in M2 versus M1 occlusions. Subgroup analyses of different technical approaches within the M2 MT cohort were also performed. Patients were included from the German Stroke Registry (GSR), a multicenter registry of consecutive MT patients. Primary outcomes were reperfusion success events. Secondary outcomes were early clinical improvement (improvement in NIHSS score > 4) and independent survival at 90 days (mRS 0-2). Out of 3804 patients, 2689 presented with M1 (71\%) and 1115 with isolated M2 occlusions (29\%). The mean age was 76 (CI 65-82) and 77 (CI 66-83) years, respectively. Except for baseline NIHSS (15 (CI 10-18) vs. 11 (CI 6-16), p < 0.001) and ASPECTS (9 (CI 7-10) vs. 9 (CI 8-10, p < 0.001), baseline demographics were balanced. Apart from a more frequent use of dedicated small vessel stent retrievers (svSR) in M2 (17.4\% vs. 3.0; p < 0.001), intraprocedural aspects were balanced. There was no difference in ICH at 24 h (11\%; p = 1.0), adverse events (14.4\% vs. 18.1\%; p = 0.63), clinical improvement (62.5\% vs. 61.4 \%; p = 0.57), mortality (26.9\% vs. 22.9\%; p = 0.23). In M2 MT, conventional stent retriever (cSR) achieved higher rates of mTICI3 (54.0\% vs. 37.7-42.0\%; p < 0.001), requiring more MT-maneuvers (7, CI 2-8) vs. 2 (CI 2-7)/(CI 2-2); p < 0.001) and without impact on efficacy and outcome. Real-life MT in M2 can be performed with equal safety and efficacy as in M1 occlusions. Different recanalization techniques including the use of svSR did not result in significant differences regarding safety, efficacy and outcome.},
  language  = {en}
}