@article{SchilcherHilsmannRauscheretal.2021, author = {Schilcher, Felix and Hilsmann, Lioba and Rauscher, Lisa and Değirmenci, Laura and Krischke, Markus and Krischke, Beate and Ankenbrand, Markus and Rutschmann, Benjamin and Mueller, Martin J. and Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf and Scheiner, Ricarda}, title = {In vitro rearing changes social task performance and physiology in honeybees}, series = {Insects}, volume = {13}, journal = {Insects}, number = {1}, issn = {2075-4450}, doi = {10.3390/insects13010004}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-252305}, year = {2021}, abstract = {In vitro rearing of honeybee larvae is an established method that enables exact control and monitoring of developmental factors and allows controlled application of pesticides or pathogens. However, only a few studies have investigated how the rearing method itself affects the behavior of the resulting adult honeybees. We raised honeybees in vitro according to a standardized protocol: marking the emerging honeybees individually and inserting them into established colonies. Subsequently, we investigated the behavioral performance of nurse bees and foragers and quantified the physiological factors underlying the social organization. Adult honeybees raised in vitro differed from naturally reared honeybees in their probability of performing social tasks. Further, in vitro-reared bees foraged for a shorter duration in their life and performed fewer foraging trips. Nursing behavior appeared to be unaffected by rearing condition. Weight was also unaffected by rearing condition. Interestingly, juvenile hormone titers, which normally increase strongly around the time when a honeybee becomes a forager, were significantly lower in three- and four-week-old in vitro bees. The effects of the rearing environment on individual sucrose responsiveness and lipid levels were rather minor. These data suggest that larval rearing conditions can affect the task performance and physiology of adult bees despite equal weight, pointing to an important role of the colony environment for these factors. Our observations of behavior and metabolic pathways offer important novel insight into how the rearing environment affects adult honeybees.}, language = {en} } @article{RuedenauerRaubenheimerKessnerBeierleinetal.2020, author = {Ruedenauer, Fabian A. and Raubenheimer, David and Kessner-Beierlein, Daniela and Grund-Mueller, Nils and Noack, Lisa and Spaethe, Johannes and Leonhardt, Sara D.}, title = {Best be(e) on low fat: linking nutrient perception, regulation and fitness}, series = {Ecology Letters}, volume = {23}, journal = {Ecology Letters}, number = {3}, doi = {10.1111/ele.13454}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-208709}, pages = {545-554}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Preventing malnutrition through consuming nutritionally appropriate resources represents a challenge for foraging animals. This is due to often high variation in the nutritional quality of available resources. Foragers consequently need to evaluate different food sources. However, even the same food source can provide a plethora of nutritional and non-nutritional cues, which could serve for quality assessment. We show that bumblebees, Bombus terrestris , overcome this challenge by relying on lipids as nutritional cue when selecting pollen. The bees 'prioritised' lipid perception in learning experiments and avoided lipid consumption in feeding experiments, which supported survival and reproduction. In contrast, survival and reproduction were severely reduced by increased lipid contents. Our study highlights the importance of fat regulation for pollen foraging bumblebees. It also reveals that nutrient perception, nutrient regulation and reproductive fitness can be linked, which represents an effective strategy enabling quick foraging decisions that prevent malnutrition and maximise fitness.}, language = {en} } @article{ScheinerEntlerBarronetal.2017, author = {Scheiner, Ricarda and Entler, Brian V. and Barron, Andrew B. and Scholl, Christina and Thamm, Markus}, title = {The Effects of Fat Body Tyramine Level on Gustatory Responsiveness of Honeybees (Apis mellifera) Differ between Behavioral Castes}, series = {Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience}, volume = {11}, journal = {Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience}, number = {55}, doi = {10.3389/fnsys.2017.00055}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-157874}, year = {2017}, abstract = {Division of labor is a hallmark of social insects. In the honeybee (Apis mellifera) each sterile female worker performs a series of social tasks. The most drastic changes in behavior occur when a nurse bee, who takes care of the brood and the queen in the hive, transitions to foraging behavior. Foragers provision the colony with pollen, nectar or water. Nurse bees and foragers differ in numerous behaviors, including responsiveness to gustatory stimuli. Differences in gustatory responsiveness, in turn, might be involved in regulating division of labor through differential sensory response thresholds. Biogenic amines are important modulators of behavior. Tyramine and octopamine have been shown to increase gustatory responsiveness in honeybees when injected into the thorax, thereby possibly triggering social organization. So far, most of the experiments investigating the role of amines on gustatory responsiveness have focused on the brain. The potential role of the fat body in regulating sensory responsiveness and division of labor has large been neglected. We here investigated the role of the fat body in modulating gustatory responsiveness through tyramine signaling in different social roles of honeybees. We quantified levels of tyramine, tyramine receptor gene expression and the effect of elevating fat body tyramine titers on gustatory responsiveness in both nurse bees and foragers. Our data suggest that elevating the tyramine titer in the fat body pharmacologically increases gustatory responsiveness in foragers, but not in nurse bees. This differential effect of tyramine on gustatory responsiveness correlates with a higher natural gustatory responsiveness of foragers, with a higher tyramine receptor (Amtar1) mRNA expression in fat bodies of foragers and with lower baseline tyramine titers in fat bodies of foragers compared to those of nurse bees. We suggest that differential tyramine signaling in the fat body has an important role in the plasticity of division of labor through changing gustatory responsiveness.}, language = {en} }