@article{AzzamiRitterTautzetal.2012,
  author    = {Azzami, Klara and Ritter, Wolfgang and Tautz, J{\"u}rgen and Beier, Hildburg},
  title     = {Infection of honey bees with acute bee paralysis virus does not trigger humoral or cellular immune responses},
  series = {Archives of Virology},
  volume    = {157},
  journal   = {Archives of Virology},
  number    = {4},
  doi       = {10.1007/s00705-012-1223-0},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-126863},
  pages     = {689-702},
  year      = {2012},
  abstract  = {We have studied the responses of honey bees at different life stages (Apis mellifera) to controlled infection with acute bee paralysis virus and have identified the haemolymph of infected larvae and adult worker bees as the compartment where massive propagation of ABPV occurs. Insects respond with a broad spectrum of induced innate immune reactions to bacterial infections, whereas defence mechanisms based on RNA interference play a major role in antiviral immunity. In this study, we have determined that honey bee larvae and adult workers do not produce a humoral immune reaction upon artificial infection with ABPV, in contrast to control individuals challenged with Escherichia coli. ABPV-infected bees produced neither elevated levels of specific antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), such as hymenoptaecin and defensin, nor any general antimicrobial activity, as revealed by inhibition-zone assays. Additionally, adult bees did not generate melanised nodules upon ABPV infection, an important cellular immune function activated by bacteria and viruses in some insects. Challenge of bees with both ABPV and E. coli showed that innate humoral and cellular immune reactions are induced in mixed infections, albeit at a reduced level.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BeerHelfrichFoerster2020,
  author    = {Beer, Katharina and Helfrich-F{\"o}rster, Charlotte},
  title     = {Post-embryonic Development of the Circadian Clock Seems to Correlate With Social Life Style in Bees},
  series = {Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology},
  volume    = {8},
  journal   = {Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology},
  issn      = {2296-634X},
  doi       = {10.3389/fcell.2020.581323},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-216450},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Social life style can influence many aspects of an animal's daily life, but it has not yet been clarified, whether development of the circadian clock in social and solitary living bees differs. In a comparative study, with the social honey bee, Apis mellifera, and the solitary mason bee, Osmia bicornis, we now found indications for a differentially timed clock development in social and solitary bees. Newly emerged solitary bees showed rhythmic locomotion right away and the number of neurons in the brain that produce the clock component pigment-dispersing factor (PDF) did not change during aging of the adult solitary bee. Honey bees on the other hand, showed no circadian locomotion directly after emergence and the neuronal clock network continued to grow after emergence. Social bees appear to emerge at an early developmental stage at which the circadian clock is still immature, but bees are already able to fulfill in-hive tasks.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SponslerBratman2021,
  author    = {Sponsler, Douglas B. and Bratman, Eve Z.},
  title     = {Beekeeping in, of or for the city? A socioecological perspective on urban apiculture},
  series = {People and Nature},
  volume    = {3},
  journal   = {People and Nature},
  number    = {3},
  doi       = {10.1002/pan3.10206},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-239949},
  pages     = {550 -- 559},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {The term 'urban beekeeping' connotes a host of meanings—sociopolitical, commercial, ecological and personal—beyond the mere description of where bees and beekeepers happen to coincide. Yet, these meanings are seldom articulated explicitly or brought into critical engagement with the relevant fields of urban ecology and political ecology. Beginning with a brief account of the history of urban beekeeping in the United States, we draw upon urban ecological theory to construct a conceptual model of urban beekeeping that distinguishes beekeeping in, of and for the city. In our model, beekeeping in the city describes the mere importation of the traditionally rural practice of beekeeping into urban spaces for the private reasons of the individual beekeeper, whereas beekeeping of the city describes beekeeping that is consciously tailored to the urban context, often accompanied by (semi)professionalization of beekeepers and the formation of local expert communities (i.e. beekeeping associations). Beekeeping for the city describes a shift in mindset in which beekeeping is directed to civic ends beyond the boundaries of the beekeeping community per se. Using this framework, we identify and discuss specific socioecological assets and liabilities of urban beekeeping, and how these relate to beekeeping in, of and for the city. We then formulate actionable guidelines for maturing the practice of urban beekeeping into a beneficent and self-critical form of urban ecological citizenship; these include fostering self-regulation within the beekeeping community, harnessing beekeeping as a 'gateway' experience for a broader rapprochement between urban residents and nature, and recognizing the political-ecological context of beekeeping with respect to matters of socioecological justice.},
  language  = {en}
}