@phdthesis{Hovhanyan2014,
  author    = {Hovhanyan, Anna},
  title     = {Functional analyses of Mushroom body miniature (Mbm) in growth and proliferation of neural progenitor cells in the central brain of Drosophila melanogaster},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-91303},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {Zellwachstum und Zellteilung stellen zwei miteinander verkn{\"u}pfte Prozesse dar, die dennoch grunds{\"a}tzlich voneinander zu unterscheiden sind. Die Wiederaufnahme der Proliferation von neuralen Vorl{\"a}uferzellen (Neuroblasten) im Zentralhirn von Drosophila nach der sp{\"a}t-embryonalen Ruhephase erfordert zun{\"a}chst Zellwachstum. Der Erhalt der regul{\"a}ren Zellgr{\"o}ße ist eine wichtige Voraussetzung f{\"u}r die kontinuierliche Proliferation der Neuroblasten {\"u}ber die gesamte larvale Entwicklungsphase. Neben extrinsischen Ern{\"a}hrungssignalen ist f{\"u}r das Zellwachstum eine kontinuierliche Versorgung mit funktionellen Ribosomen notwendig, damit die Proteinsynthese aufrechterhalten werden kann. Mutationen im mushroom body miniature (mbm) Gen wurden {\"u}ber einen genetischen Screen nach strukturellen Gehirnmutanten identifiziert. Der Schwerpunkt dieser Arbeit lag in der funktionellen Charakterisierung des Mbm Proteins als neues nukleol{\"a}res Protein und damit seiner m{\"o}glichen Beteiligung in der Ribosomenbiogenese. Der Vergleich der relativen Expressionslevel von Mbm und anderen nuklearen Proteinen in verschiedenen Zelltypen zeigte eine verst{\"a}rkte Expression von Mbm in der fibrill{\"a}ren Komponente des Nukleolus von Neuroblasten. Diese Beobachtung legte die Vermutung nahe, dass in Neuroblasten neben generell ben{\"o}tigten Faktoren der Ribosomenbiogenese auch Zelltyp-spezifische Faktoren existieren. Mutationen in mbm verursachen Proliferationsdefekte von Neuroblasten, wirken sich jedoch nicht auf deren Zellpolarit{\"a}t, die Orientierung der mitotischen Spindel oder die Asymmetrie der Zellteilung aus. Stattdessen wurde eine Reduktion der Zellgr{\"o}ße beobachtet, was im Einklang mit einer Beeintr{\"a}chtigung der Ribosomenbiogenese steht. Insbesondere f{\"u}hrt der Verlust der Mbm Funktion zu einer Retention der kleinen ribosomalen Untereinheit im Nukleolus, was eine verminderte Proteinsynthese zur Folge hat. Interessanterweise wurden St{\"o}rungen der Ribosomenbiogenese nur in den Neuroblasten beobachtet. Zudem ist Mbm offensichtlich nicht erforderlich, um Wachstum oder die Proliferation von Zellen der Fl{\"u}gelimginalscheibe und S2-Zellen zu steuern, was wiederum daf{\"u}r spricht, dass Mbm eine Neuroblasten-spezifische Funktion erf{\"u}llt. Dar{\"u}ber hinaus wurden die transkriptionelle Regulation des mbm-Gens und die funktionelle Bedeutung von posttranslationalen Modifikationen analysiert. Mbm Transkription wird von dMyc reguliert. Ein gemeinsames Merkmal von dMyc Zielgenen ist das Vorhandensein einer konservierten „E-Box"-Sequenz in deren Promotorregionen. In der Umgebung der mbm-Transkriptionsstartstelle befinden sich zwei „E-Box"-Motive. Mit Hilfe von Genreporteranalysen konnte nachgewiesen werden, dass nur eine von ihnen die dMyc-abh{\"a}ngige Transkription vermittelt. Die dMyc-abh{\"a}ngige Expression von Mbm konnte auch in Neuroblasten verifiziert werden. Auf posttranslationaler Ebene wird Mbm durch die Proteinkinase CK2 phosphoryliert. In der C-terminalen H{\"a}lfte des Mbm Proteins wurden in zwei Clustern mit einer Abfolge von sauren Aminos{\"a}uren sechs Serin- und Threoninreste als CK2- Phosphorylierungsstellen identifiziert. Eine Mutationsanalyse dieser Stellen best{\"a}tigte deren Bedeutung f{\"u}r die Mbm Funktion in vivo. Weiterhin ergaben sich Evidenzen, dass die Mbm-Lokalisierung durch die CK2-vermittelte Phosphorylierung gesteuert wird. Obwohl die genaue molekulare Funktion von Mbm in der Ribosomenbiogenese noch im Unklaren ist, unterstreichen die Ergebnisse dieser Studie die besondere Rolle von Mbm in der Ribosomenbiogenese von Neuroblasten um Zellwachstum und Proliferation zu regulieren.},
  subject      = {Taufliege},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{LuiblneeHermann2014,
  author    = {Luibl [n{\´e}e Hermann], Christiane},
  title     = {The role of the neuropeptides NPF, sNPF, ITP and PDF in the circadian clock of Drosophila melanogaster},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-93796},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {Organisms have evolved endogenous clocks which allow them to organize their behavior, metabolism and physiology according to the periodically changing environmental conditions on earth. Biological rhythms that are synchronized to daily changes in environment are governed by the so-called circadian clock. Since decades, chronobiologists have been investigating circadian clocks in various model organisms including the fruitfly Drosophila melanogaster, which was used in the present thesis. Anatomically, the circadian clock of the fruitfly consists of about 150 neurons in the lateral and dorsal protocerebrum, which are characterized by their position, morphology and neurochemistry. Some of these neurons had been previously shown to contain either one or several neuropeptides, which are thought to be the main signaling molecules used by the clock. The best investigated of these neuropeptides is the Pigment Dispersing Factor (PDF), which had been shown to constitute a synchronizing signal between clock neurons as well as an output factor of the clock. In collaboration with various coworkers, I investigated the roles of three other clock expressed neuropeptides for the generation of behavioral rhythms and the partly published, partly unpublished data are presented in this thesis. Thereby, I focused on the Neuropeptide F (NPF), short Neuropeptide F (sNPF) and the Ion Transport Peptide (ITP). We show that part of the neuropeptide composition within the clock network seems to be conserved among different Drosophila species. However, the PDF expression pattern in certain neurons varied in species deriving from lower latitudes compared to higher latitudes. Together with findings on the behavioral level provided by other people, these data suggest that different species may have altered certain properties of their clocks - like the neuropeptide expression in certain neurons - in order to adapt their behavior to different habitats. We then investigated locomotor rhythms in Drosophila melanogaster flies, in which neuropeptide circuits were genetically manipulated either by cell ablation or RNA interference (RNAi). We found that none of the investigated neuropeptides seems to be of equal importance for circadian locomotor rhythms as PDF. PDF had been previously shown to be necessary for rhythm maintenance in constant darkness (DD) as well as for the generation of morning (M) activity and for the right phasing of the evening (E) activity in entrained conditions. We now demonstrate that NPF and ITP seem to promote E activity in entrained conditions, but are clearly not the only factors doing so. In addition, ITP seems to reduce nighttime activity. Further, ITP and possibly also sNPF constitute weak period shortening components in DD, thereby opposing the effect of PDF. However, neither NPF or ITP, nor sNPF seem to be necessary in the clock neurons for maintaining rhythmicity in DD. It had been previously suggested that PDF is released rhythmically from the dorsal projection terminals. Now we discovered a rhythm in ITP immunostaining in the dorsal projection terminals of the ITP+ clock neurons in LD, suggesting a rhythm in peptide release also in the case of ITP. Rhythmic release of both ITP and PDF seems to be important to maintain rhythmic behavior in DD, since constantly high levels of PDF and ITP in the dorsal protocerebrum lead to behavioral arrhythmicity. Applying live-imaging techniques we further demonstrate that sNPF acts in an inhibitory way on few clock neurons, including some that are also activated by PDF, suggesting that it acts as signaling molecule within the clock network and has opposing effects to PDF. NPF did only evoke very little inhibitory responses in very few clock neurons, suggesting that it might rather be used as a clock output factor. We were not able to apply the same live-imaging approach for the investigation of the clock neuron responsiveness to ITP, but overexpression of ITP with various driver lines showed that the peptide most likely acts mainly in clock output pathways rather than inter-clock neuron communication. Taking together, I conclude that all investigated peptides contribute to the control of locomotor rhythms in the fruitfly Drosophila melanogaster. However, this control is in most aspects dominated by the actions of PDF and rather only fine-tuned or complemented by the other peptides. I assume that there is a high complexity in spatial and temporal action of the different neuropeptides in order to ensure correct signal processing within the clock network as well as clock output.},
  subject      = {Taufliege},
  language  = {en}
}