@article{StreckForstervonHertzbergBoelchetal.2022,
  author    = {Streck, Laura Elisa and Forster, Johannes and von Hertzberg-Boelch, Sebastian Philipp and Reichel, Thomas and Rudert, Maximilian and Rueckl, Kilian},
  title     = {The role of synovial fluid aspiration in shoulder joint infections},
  series = {BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders},
  volume    = {23},
  journal   = {BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders},
  doi       = {10.1186/s12891-022-05285-x},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-300795},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Background Joint aspiration with analysis of synovial fluid white blood cell count (WBC) and microbiological culture is a widely established aspect in the diagnosis of shoulder joint infections (SJI). In case of a two stage revision for SJI, joint aspiration before re-/implantation of a total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) was used to rule out persistent infection for years but its value is under debate. Shoulder specific data on all aspects is rare. The current study aims to answer the following research questions: Does joint aspiration have an insufficient predictive value in the diagnosis of SJI in (1) initial workup and (2) before definite arthroplasty with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA)-Spacer in place? Methods This retrospective evaluation investigates 35 patients that were treated for SJI with a two staged implantation of a TSA after debridement and implantation of an PMMA-Spacer. Joint aspirations were performed preoperatively (PA) and before re-/implantation of the prosthesis while spacer was in place (interstage aspiration, IA). Samples were taken for microbiological culture and analysis of WBC. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated with reference to intraoperative microbiological samples. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC), Area-Under-Curve analysis (AUC) and calculation of the Youden index were performed to find optimum cut-off for WBC. Results The sensitivity of microbiological cultures from PA was 58.3\% and the specificity was 88.9\%. The mean WBC was 27,800 leucocytes/mm3 (range 400-96,300). The maximum Youden index (0.857) was a cut-off of 2600 leucocytes/mm3 with a sensitivity of 85.7\% and a specificity of 100.0\%. The sensitivity and specificity of IA were 0.0\% and 88.5\%, respectively. Conclusions Preoperative aspiration is likely to miss Cutibacteria spp. and CoNS and cannot rule out infection for sure. However, we recommend it for its advantages of targeted antibiotic therapy in case of germ identification. Empiric antibiotic therapy should cover Cutibacteria and CoNS even if aspiration showed negative microbiological cultures. In contrast, the diagnostic value of interstage aspiration does not qualify for its routine use.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{ProdingerLazicHorasetal.2020,
  author    = {Prodinger, Peter Michael and Lazic, Igor and Horas, Konstantin and Burgkart, Rainer and von Eisenhart-Rothe, R{\"u}diger and Weissenberger, Manuel and Rudert, Maximilian and Holzapfel, Boris Michael},
  title     = {Revision Arthroplasty Through the Direct Anterior Approach Using an Asymmetric Acetabular Component},
  series = {Journal of Clinical Medicine},
  volume    = {9},
  journal   = {Journal of Clinical Medicine},
  number    = {9},
  issn      = {2077-0383},
  doi       = {10.3390/jcm9093031},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-213184},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Despite increasing numbers of primary hip arthroplasties performed through the direct anterior approach (DAA), there is a lack of literature on DAA revision arthroplasty. The present study was performed in order to evaluate outcomes and revision rates after revision through the DAA using an asymmetric acetabular component with optional intra- and extramedullary fixation. In a retrospective cohort study, we analyzed prospectively collected data of 57 patients (61 hips, 43 female, 18 male) who underwent aseptic acetabular component revision through the DAA with the abovementioned implant system between January 2015 and December 2017. The mean follow-up was 40 months (12-56). Survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. All complications were documented and functional outcomes were assessed pre- and postoperatively. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed an estimated five-year implant survival of 97\% (confidence interval CI 87-99\%). The estimated five-year survival with revision for any cause was 93\% (CI 83-98\%). The overall revision rate was 6.6\% (n = 4). Two patients had to undergo revision due to periprosthetic infection (3.3\%). In one patient, the acetabular component was revised due to aseptic loosening four months postoperatively. Another patient suffered from postoperative iliopsoas impingement and was treated successfully by arthroscopic iliopsoas tenotomy. Two (3.3\%) of the revised hips dislocated postoperatively. The mean Harris Hip Score improved from 35 (2-66) preoperatively to 86 (38-100) postoperatively (p < 0.001). The hip joint's anatomical center of rotation was restored at a high degree of accuracy. Our findings demonstrate that acetabular revision arthroplasty through the DAA using an asymmetric acetabular component with optional intra- and extramedullary fixation is safe and practicable, resulting in good radiographic and clinical midterm results.},
  language  = {en}
}