@incollection{LutStarenkova2022,
  author    = {Lut, Kateryna and Starenkova, Hanna},
  title     = {The Relationship between Language, Culture, and Development of Society},
  series = {Studies in Modern English},
  booktitle = {Studies in Modern English},
  editor    = {Lazebna, Nataliia and Kumar, Dinesh},
  publisher = {W{\"u}rzburg University Press},
  address   = {W{\"u}rzburg},
  doi       = {10.25972/WUP-978-3-95826-199-0-63},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-296484},
  publisher      = {W{\"u}rzburg University Press},
  pages     = {63-72},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {The paper analyses specific characteristics of language that influence the development of culture and societies. The problem of the connection between language and culture has occupied the minds of many famous scientists: some believe that language is a part of the culture as a whole; others think that language is only a form of cultural expression. Undoubtedly, language constitutes a vital component of the cultural background underlying social development. Language is an essential means of communication and interaction. However, language is at the same time sovereign about culture as a whole and can be separate from culture or compared to culture as an equal element (i.e., that language is neither a form nor a component of culture).},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BeerHelfrichFoerster2020,
  author    = {Beer, Katharina and Helfrich-F{\"o}rster, Charlotte},
  title     = {Post-embryonic Development of the Circadian Clock Seems to Correlate With Social Life Style in Bees},
  series = {Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology},
  volume    = {8},
  journal   = {Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology},
  issn      = {2296-634X},
  doi       = {10.3389/fcell.2020.581323},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-216450},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Social life style can influence many aspects of an animal's daily life, but it has not yet been clarified, whether development of the circadian clock in social and solitary living bees differs. In a comparative study, with the social honey bee, Apis mellifera, and the solitary mason bee, Osmia bicornis, we now found indications for a differentially timed clock development in social and solitary bees. Newly emerged solitary bees showed rhythmic locomotion right away and the number of neurons in the brain that produce the clock component pigment-dispersing factor (PDF) did not change during aging of the adult solitary bee. Honey bees on the other hand, showed no circadian locomotion directly after emergence and the neuronal clock network continued to grow after emergence. Social bees appear to emerge at an early developmental stage at which the circadian clock is still immature, but bees are already able to fulfill in-hive tasks.},
  language  = {en}
}