@article{JanschGuentherWaideretal.2018, author = {Jansch, Charline and G{\"u}nther, Katharina and Waider, Jonas and Ziegler, Georg C. and Forero, Andrea and Kollert, Sina and Svirin, Evgeniy and P{\"u}hringer, Dirk and Kwok, Chee Keong and Ullmann, Reinhard and Maierhofer, Anna and Flunkert, Julia and Haaf, Thomas and Edenhofer, Frank and Lesch, Klaus-Peter}, title = {Generation of a human induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) line from a 51-year-old female with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) carrying a duplication of SLC2A3}, series = {Stem Cell Research}, volume = {28}, journal = {Stem Cell Research}, doi = {10.1016/j.scr.2018.02.005}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-176654}, pages = {136-140}, year = {2018}, abstract = {Fibroblasts were isolated from a skin biopsy of a clinically diagnosed 51-year-old female attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) patient carrying a duplication of SLC2A3, a gene encoding neuronal glucose transporter-3 (GLUT3). Patient fibroblasts were infected with Sendai virus, a single-stranded RNA virus, to generate transgene-free human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). SLC2A3-D2-iPSCs showed expression of pluripotency-associated markers, were able to differentiate into cells of the three germ layers in vitro and had a normal female karyotype. This in vitro cellular model can be used to study the role of risk genes in the pathogenesis of ADHD, in a patient-specific manner.}, language = {en} } @article{FlunkertMaierhoferDittrichetal.2018, author = {Flunkert, Julia and Maierhofer, Anna and Dittrich, Marcus and M{\"u}ller, Tobias and Horvath, Steve and Nanda, Indrajit and Haaf, Thomas}, title = {Genetic and epigenetic changes in clonal descendants of irradiated human fibroblasts}, series = {Experimental Cell Research}, volume = {370}, journal = {Experimental Cell Research}, doi = {10.1016/j.yexcr.2018.06.034}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-228177}, pages = {322-332}, year = {2018}, abstract = {To study delayed genetic and epigenetic radiation effects, which may trigger radiation-induced carcinogenesis, we have established single-cell clones from irradiated and non-irradiated primary human fibroblasts. Stable clones were endowed with the same karyotype in all analyzed metaphases after 20 population doublings (PDs), whereas unstable clones displayed mosaics of normal and abnormal karyotypes. To account for variation in radiation sensitivity, all experiments were performed with two different fibroblast strains. After a single X-ray dose of 2 Gy more than half of the irradiated clones exhibited radiation-induced genome instability (RIGI). Irradiated clones displayed an increased rate of loss of chromosome Y (LOY) and copy number variations (CNVs), compared to controls. CNV breakpoints clustered in specific chromosome regions, in particular 3p14.2 and 7q11.21, coinciding with common fragile sites. CNVs affecting the FHIT gene in FRA3B were observed in independent unstable clones and may drive RIGI. Bisulfite pyrosequencing of control clones and the respective primary culture revealed global hypomethylation of ALU, LINE-1, and alpha-satellite repeats as well as rDNA hypermethylation during in vitro ageing. Irradiated clones showed further reduced ALU and alpha-satellite methylation and increased rDNA methylation, compared to controls. Methylation arrays identified several hundred differentially methylated genes and several enriched pathways associated with in vitro ageing. Methylation changes in 259 genes and the MAP kinase signaling pathway were associated with delayed radiation effects (after 20 PDs). Collectively, our results suggest that both genetic (LOY and CNVs) and epigenetic changes occur in the progeny of exposed cells that were not damaged directly by irradiation, likely contributing to radiation-induced carcinogenesis. We did not observe epigenetic differences between stable and unstable irradiated clones. The fact that the DNA methylation (DNAm) age of clones derived from the same primary culture varied greatly suggests that DNAm age of a single cell (represented by a clone) can be quite different from the DNAm age of a tissue. We propose that DNAm age reflects the emergent property of a large number of individual cells whose respective DNAm ages can be highly variable.}, language = {en} }