@article{WegertVokuhlCollordetal.2018,
  author    = {Wegert, Jenny and Vokuhl, Christian and Collord, Grace and Del Castillo Velasco-Herrera, Martin and Farndon, Sarah J. and Guzzo, Charlotte and Jorgensen, Mette and Anderson, John and Slater, Olga and Duncan, Catriona and Bausenwein, Sabrina and Streitenberger, Heike and Ziegler, Barbara and Furtw{\"a}ngler, Rhoikos and Graf, Norbert and Stratton, Michael R. and Campbell, Peter J. and Jones, David TW and Koelsche, Christian and Pfister, Stefan M. and Mifsud, William and Sebire, Neil and Sparber-Sauer, Monika and Koscielniak, Ewa and Rosenwald, Andreas and Gessler, Manfred and Behjati, Sam},
  title     = {Recurrent intragenic rearrangements of EGFR and BRAF in soft tissue tumors of infants},
  series = {Nature Communications},
  volume    = {9},
  journal   = {Nature Communications},
  doi       = {10.1038/s41467-018-04650-6},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-233446},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {Soft tissue tumors of infancy encompass an overlapping spectrum of diseases that pose unique diagnostic and clinical challenges. We studied genomes and transcriptomes of cryptogenic congenital mesoblastic nephroma (CMN), and extended our findings to five anatomically or histologically related soft tissue tumors: infantile fibrosarcoma (IFS), nephroblastomatosis, Wilms tumor, malignant rhabdoid tumor, and clear cell sarcoma of the kidney. A key finding is recurrent mutation of EGFR in CMN by internal tandem duplication of the kinase domain, thus delineating CMN from other childhood renal tumors. Furthermore, we identify BRAF intragenic rearrangements in CMN and IFS. Collectively these findings reveal novel diagnostic markers and therapeutic strategies and highlight a prominent role of isolated intragenic rearrangements as drivers of infant tumors.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{ChagtaiZillDaineseetal.2016,
  author    = {Chagtai, Tasnim and Zill, Christina and Dainese, Linda and Wegert, Jenny and Savola, Suvi and Popov, Sergey and Mifsud, William and Vujanic, Gordan and Sebire, Neil and Le Bouc, Yves and Ambros, Peter F. and Kager, Leo and O`Sullivan, Maureen J. and Blaise, Annick and Bergeron, Christophe and Holmquist Mengelbier, Linda and Gisselsson, David and Kool, Marcel and Tytgat, Godelieve A.M. and van den Heuvel-Eibrink, Marry M. and Graf, Norbert and van Tinteren, Harm and Coulomb, Aurore and Gessler, Manfred and Williams, Richard Dafydd and Pritchard-Jones, Kathy},
  title     = {Gain of 1q As a Prognostic Biomarker in Wilms Tumors (WTs) Treated With Preoperative Chemotherapy in the International Society of Paediatric Oncology (SIOP) WT 2001 Trial: a SIOP Renal Tumours Biology Consortium Study},
  series = {Journal of Clinical Oncology},
  volume    = {34},
  journal   = {Journal of Clinical Oncology},
  number    = {26},
  doi       = {10.1200/JCO.2015.66.0001},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-187478},
  pages     = {3195-3205},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Purpose Wilms tumor (WT) is the most common pediatric renal tumor. Treatment planning under International Society of Paediatric Oncology (SIOP) protocols is based on staging and histologic assessment of response to preoperative chemotherapy. Despite high overall survival (OS), many relapses occur in patients without specific risk factors, and many successfully treated patients are exposed to treatments with significant risks of late effects. To investigate whether molecular biomarkers could improve risk stratification, we assessed 1q status and other potential copy number biomarkers in a large WT series. Materials and Methods WT nephrectomy samples from 586 SIOP WT 2001 patients were analyzed using a multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) assay that measured the copy number of 1q and other regions of interest. Results One hundred sixty-seven (28\%) of 586 WTs had 1q gain. Five-year event-free survival (EFS) was 75.0\% in patients with 1q gain (95\% CI, 68.5\% to 82.0\%) and 88.2\% in patients without gain (95\% CI, 85.0\% to 91.4\%). OS was 88.4\% with gain (95\% CI, 83.5\% to 93.6\%) and 94.4\% without gain (95\% CI, 92.1\% to 96.7\%). In univariable analysis, 1q gain was associated with poorer EFS (P<.001; hazard ratio, 2.33) and OS (P=.01; hazard ratio, 2.16). The association of 1q gain with poorer EFS retained significance in multivariable analysis adjusted for 1p and 16q loss, sex, stage, age, and histologic risk group. Gain of 1q remained associated with poorer EFS in tumor subsets limited to either intermediate-risk localized disease or nonanaplastic localized disease. Other notable aberrations associated with poorer EFS included MYCN gain and TP53 loss. Conclusion Gain of 1q is a potentially valuable prognostic biomarker in WT, in addition to histologic response to preoperative chemotherapy and tumor stage.},
  language  = {en}
}