@article{HofmannVoellerNagelsetal.2015,
  author    = {Hofmann, Reiner and V{\"o}ller, Heinz and Nagels, Klaus and Bindl, Dominik and Vettorazzi, Eik and Dittmar, Ronny and Wohlgemuth, Walter and Neumann, Till and St{\"o}rk, Stefan and Bruder, Oliver and Wegscheider, Karl and Nagel, Eckhard and Fleck, Eckart},
  title     = {First outline and baseline data of a randomized, controlled multicenter trial to evaluate the health economic impact of home telemonitoring in chronic heart failure - CardioBBEAT},
  series = {Trials},
  volume    = {16},
  journal   = {Trials},
  number    = {343},
  doi       = {10.1186/s13063-015-0886-8},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-151429},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {Background: Evidence that home telemonitoring for patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) offers clinical benefit over usual care is controversial as is evidence of a health economic advantage. Methods: Between January 2010 and June 2013, patients with a confirmed diagnosis of CHF were enrolled and randomly assigned to 2 study groups comprising usual care with and without an interactive bi-directional remote monitoring system (Motiva\(^{®}\)). The primary endpoint in CardioBBEAT is the Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) established by the groups' difference in total cost and in the combined clinical endpoint "days alive and not in hospital nor inpatient care per potential days in study" within the follow-up of 12 months. Results: A total of 621 predominantly male patients were enrolled, whereof 302 patients were assigned to the intervention group and 319 to the control group. Ischemic cardiomyopathy was the leading cause of heart failure. Despite randomization, subjects of the control group were more often in NYHA functional class III-IV, and exhibited peripheral edema and renal dysfunction more often. Additionally, the control and intervention groups differed in heart rhythm disorders. No differences existed regarding risk factor profile, comorbidities, echocardiographic parameters, especially left ventricular and diastolic diameter and ejection fraction, as well as functional test results, medication and quality of life. While the observed baseline differences may well be a play of chance, they are of clinical relevance. Therefore, the statistical analysis plan was extended to include adjusted analyses with respect to the baseline imbalances. Conclusions: CardioBBEAT provides prospective outcome data on both, clinical and health economic impact of home telemonitoring in CHF. The study differs by the use of a high evidence level randomized controlled trial (RCT) design along with actual cost data obtained from health insurance companies. Its results are conducive to informed political and economic decision-making with regard to home telemonitoring solutions as an option for health care. Overall, it contributes to developing advanced health economic evaluation instruments to be deployed within the specific context of the German Health Care System.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{GybergDeBacquerDeBackeretal.2015,
  author    = {Gyberg, Viveca and De Bacquer, Dirk and De Backer, Guy and Jennings, Catriona and Kotseva, Kornelia and Mellbin, Linda and Schnell, Oliver and Tuomilehto, Jaakko and Wood, David and Ryden, Lars and Amouyel, Philippe and Bruthans, Jan and Conde, Almudena Castro and Cifkova, Renata and Deckers, Jaap W. and De Sutter, Johan and Dilic, Mirza and Dolzhenko, Maryna and Erglis, Andrejs and Fras, Zlatko and Gaita, Dan and Gotcheva, Nina and Goudevenos, John and Heuschmann, Peter and Laucevicius, Aleksandras and Lehto, Seppo and Lovic, Dragan and Milicic, Davor and Moore, David and Nicolaides, Evagoras and Oganov, Raphae and Pajak, Andrzej and Pogosova, Nana and Reiner, Zeljko and Stagmo, Martin and St{\"o}rk, Stefan and Tokg{\"o}zoglu, Lale and Vulic, Dusko},
  title     = {Patients with coronary artery disease and diabetes need improved management: a report from the EUROASPIRE IV survey: a registry from the EuroObservational Research Programme of the European Society of Cardiology},
  series = {Cardiovascular Diabetology},
  volume    = {14},
  journal   = {Cardiovascular Diabetology},
  number    = {133},
  doi       = {10.1186/s12933-015-0296-y},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-141358},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {Background: In order to influence every day clinical practice professional organisations issue management guidelines. Cross-sectional surveys are used to evaluate the implementation of such guidelines. The present survey investigated screening for glucose perturbations in people with coronary artery disease and compared patients with known and newly detected type 2 diabetes with those without diabetes in terms of their life-style and pharmacological risk factor management in relation to contemporary European guidelines. Methods: A total of 6187 patients (18-80 years) with coronary artery disease and known glycaemic status based on a self reported history of diabetes (previously known diabetes) or the results of an oral glucose tolerance test and HbA1c (no diabetes or newly diagnosed diabetes) were investigated in EUROASPIRE IV including patients in 24 European countries 2012-2013. The patients were interviewed and investigated in order to enable a comparison between their actual risk factor control with that recommended in current European management guidelines and the outcome in previously conducted surveys. Results: A total of 2846 (46 \%) patients had no diabetes, 1158 (19 \%) newly diagnosed diabetes and 2183 (35 \%) previously known diabetes. The combined use of all four cardioprotective drugs in these groups was 53, 55 and 60 \%, respectively. A blood pressure target of <140/90 mmHg was achieved in 68, 61, 54 \% and a LDL-cholesterol target of <1.8 mmol/L in 16, 18 and 28 \%. Patients with newly diagnosed and previously known diabetes reached an HbA1c <7.0 \% (53 mmol/mol) in 95 and 53 \% and 11 \% of those with previously known diabetes had an HbA1c >9.0 \% (>75 mmol/mol). Of the patients with diabetes 69 \% reported on low physical activity. The proportion of patients participating in cardiac rehabilitation programmes was low (approximate to 40 \%) and only 27 \% of those with diabetes had attended diabetes schools. Compared with data from previous surveys the use of cardioprotective drugs had increased and more patients were achieving the risk factor treatment targets. Conclusions: Despite advances in patient management there is further potential to improve both the detection and management of patients with diabetes and coronary artery disease.},
  language  = {en}
}