@article{SchwitterWackerWilkeetal.2012, author = {Schwitter, Juerg and Wacker, Christian M. and Wilke, Norbert and Al-Saadi, Nidal and Sauer, Ekkehart and Huettle, Kalman and Sch{\"o}nberg, Stefan O. and Debl, Kurt and Strohm, Oliver and Ahlstrom, Hakan and Dill, Thorsten and Hoebel, Nadja and Simor, Tamas}, title = {Superior diagnostic performance of perfusion-cardiovascular magnetic resonance versus SPECT to detect coronary artery disease: The secondary endpoints of the multicenter multivendor MR-IMPACT II (Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Myocardial Perfusion Assessment in Coronary Artery Disease Trial)}, series = {Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance}, volume = {14}, journal = {Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance}, number = {61}, organization = {MR-IMPACT investigators}, doi = {10.1186/1532-429X-14-61}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-134256}, year = {2012}, abstract = {Background: Perfusion-cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is generally accepted as an alternative to SPECT to assess myocardial ischemia non-invasively. However its performance vs gated-SPECT and in sub-populations is not fully established. The goal was to compare in a multicenter setting the diagnostic performance of perfusion-CMR and gated-SPECT for the detection of CAD in various populations using conventional x-ray coronary angiography (CXA) as the standard of reference. Methods: In 33 centers (in US and Europe) 533 patients, eligible for CXA or SPECT, were enrolled in this multivendor trial. SPECT and CXA were performed within 4 weeks before or after CMR in all patients. Prevalence of CAD in the sample was 49\% and 515 patients received MR contrast medium. Drop-out rates for CMR and SPECT were 5.6\% and 3.7\%, respectively (ns). The study was powered for the primary endpoint of non-inferiority of CMR vs SPECT for both, sensitivity and specificity for the detection of CAD (using a single-threshold reading), the results for the primary endpoint were reported elsewhere. In this article secondary endpoints are presented, i.e. the diagnostic performance of CMR versus SPECT in subpopulations such as multi-vessel disease (MVD), in men, in women, and in patients without prior myocardial infarction (MI). For diagnostic performance assessment the area under the receiver-operator-characteristics-curve (AUC) was calculated. Readers were blinded versus clinical data, CXA, and imaging results. Results: The diagnostic performance (= area under ROC = AUC) of CMR was superior to SPECT (p = 0.0004, n = 425) and to gated-SPECT (p = 0.018, n = 253). CMR performed better than SPECT in MVD (p = 0.003 vs all SPECT, p = 0.04 vs gated-SPECT), in men (p = 0.004, n = 313) and in women (p = 0.03, n = 112) as well as in the non-infarct patients (p = 0.005, n = 186 in 1-3 vessel disease and p = 0.015, n = 140 in MVD). Conclusion: In this large multicenter, multivendor study the diagnostic performance of perfusion-CMR to detect CAD was superior to perfusion SPECT in the entire population and in sub-groups. Perfusion-CMR can be recommended as an alternative for SPECT imaging.}, language = {en} } @article{WestermaierLinsenmannHomolaetal.2016, author = {Westermaier, Thomas and Linsenmann, Thomas and Homola, Gy{\"o}rgy A. and Loehr, Mario and Stetter, Christian and Willner, Nadine and Ernestus, Ralf-Ingo and Soymosi, Laszlo and Vince, Giles H.}, title = {3D rotational fluoroscopy for intraoperative clip control in patients with intracranial aneurysms - assessment of feasibility and image quality}, series = {BMC Medical Imaging}, volume = {16}, journal = {BMC Medical Imaging}, number = {30}, doi = {10.1186/s12880-016-0133-0}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-146381}, year = {2016}, abstract = {Background Mobile 3D fluoroscopes have become increasingly available in neurosurgical operating rooms. In this series, the image quality and value of intraoperative 3D fluoroscopy with intravenous contrast agent for the evaluation of aneurysm occlusion and vessel patency after clip placement was assessed in patients who underwent surgery for intracranial aneurysms. Materials and methods Twelve patients were included in this retrospective analysis. Prior to surgery, a 360° rotational fluoroscopy scan was performed without contrast agent followed by another scan with 50 ml of intravenous iodine contrast agent. The image files of both scans were transferred to an Apple PowerMac® workstation, subtracted and reconstructed using OsiriX® free software. The procedure was repeated after clip placement. Both image sets were compared for assessment of aneurysm occlusion and vessel patency. Results Image acquisition and contrast administration caused no adverse effects. Image quality was sufficient to follow the patency of the vessels distal to the clip. Metal artifacts reduce the assessability of the immediate vicinity of the clip. Precise image subtraction and post-processing can reduce metal artifacts and make the clip-site assessable and depict larger neck-remnants. Conclusion This technique quickly supplies images at adequate quality to evaluate distal vessel patency after aneurysm clipping. Significant aneurysm remnants may be depicted as well. As it does not require visual control of all vessels that are supposed to be evaluated intraoperatively, this technique may be complementary to other intraoperative tools like indocyanine green videoangiography and micro-Doppler, especially for the assessment of larger aneurysms. At the momentary state of this technology, it cannot replace postoperative conventional angiography. However, 3D fluoroscopy and image post-processing are young technologies. Further technical developments are likely to result in improved image quality.}, language = {en} }