@article{Appelt‐MenzelOerterMathewetal.2020,
  author    = {Appelt-Menzel, Antje and Oerter, Sabrina and Mathew, Sanjana and Haferkamp, Undine and Hartmann, Carla and Jung, Matthias and Neuhaus, Winfried and Pless, Ole},
  title     = {Human iPSC-Derived Blood-Brain Barrier Models: Valuable Tools for Preclinical Drug Discovery and Development?},
  series = {Current Protocols in Stem Cell Biology},
  volume    = {55},
  journal   = {Current Protocols in Stem Cell Biology},
  number    = {1},
  doi       = {10.1002/cpsc.122},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-218509},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Translating basic biological knowledge into applications remains a key issue for effectively tackling neurodegenerative, neuroinflammatory, or neuroendocrine disorders. Efficient delivery of therapeutics across the neuroprotective blood-brain barrier (BBB) still poses a demanding challenge for drug development targeting central nervous system diseases. Validated in vitro models of the BBB could facilitate effective testing of drug candidates targeting the brain early in the drug discovery process during lead generation. We here review the potential of mono- or (isogenic) co-culture BBB models based on brain capillary endothelial cells (BCECs) derived from human-induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs), and compare them to several available BBB in vitro models from primary human or non-human cells and to rodent in vivo models, as well as to classical and widely used barrier models [Caco-2, parallel artificial membrane permeability assay (PAMPA)]. In particular, we are discussing the features and predictivity of these models and how hiPSC-derived BBB models could impact future discovery and development of novel CNS-targeting therapeutics.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SchreweLillLiuetal.2015,
  author    = {Schrewe, L. and Lill, C. M. and Liu, T. and Salmen, A. and Gerdes, L. A. and Guillot-Noel, L. and Akkad, D. A. and Blaschke, P. and Graetz, C. and Hoffjan, S. and Kroner, A. and Demir, S. and B{\"o}hme, A. and Rieckmann, P. and El Ali, A. and Hagemann, N. and Hermann, D. M. and Cournu-Rebeix, I. and Zipp, F. and K{\"u}mpfel, T. and Buttmann, M. and Zettl, U. K. and Fontaine, B. and Bertram, L. and Gold, R. and Chan, A.},
  title     = {Investigation of sex-specific effects of apolipoprotein E on severity of EAE and MS},
  series = {Journal of Neuroinflammation},
  volume    = {12},
  journal   = {Journal of Neuroinflammation},
  number    = {234},
  doi       = {10.1186/s12974-015-0429-y},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-136252},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {Background: Despite pleiotropic immunomodulatory effects of apolipoprotein E (apoE) in vitro, its effects on the clinical course of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) and multiple sclerosis (MS) are still controversial. As sex hormones modify immunomodulatory apoE functions, they may explain contentious findings. This study aimed to investigate sex-specific effects of apoE on disease course of EAE and MS. Methods: MOG\(_{35-55}\) induced EAE in female and male apoE-deficient mice was assessed clinically and histopathologically. apoE expression was investigated by qPCR. The association of the MS severity score (MSSS) and APOE rs429358 and rs7412 was assessed across 3237 MS patients using linear regression analyses. Results: EAE disease course was slightly attenuated in male apoE-deficient (apoE\(^{-/-}\)) mice compared to wildtype mice (cumulative median score: apoE\(^{-/-}\) = 2 [IQR 0.0-4.5]; wildtype = 4 [IQR 1.0-5.0]; n = 10 each group, p = 0.0002). In contrast, EAE was more severe in female apoE\(^{-/-}\) mice compared to wildtype mice (cumulative median score: apoE\(^{-/-}\) = 3 [IQR 2.0-4.5]; wildtype = 3 [IQR 0.0-4.0]; n = 10, p = 0.003). In wildtype animals, apoE expression during the chronic EAE phase was increased in both females and males (in comparison to naive animals; p < 0.001). However, in MS, we did not observe a significant association between MSSS and rs429358 or rs7412, neither in the overall analyses nor upon stratification for sex. Conclusions: apoE exerts moderate sex-specific effects on EAE severity. However, the results in the apoE knock-out model are not comparable to effects of polymorphic variants in the human APOE gene, thus pinpointing the challenge of translating findings from the EAE model to the human disease.},
  language  = {en}
}