@article{HerbertWoeckelKreienbergetal.2021,
  author    = {Herbert, S. L. and W{\"o}ckel, A. and Kreienberg, R. and K{\"u}hn, T. and Flock, F. and Felberbaum, R. and Janni, W. and Curtaz, C. and Kiesel, M. and St{\"u}ber, T. and Diessner, J. and Salmen, J. and Schwentner, L. and Fink, V. and Bekes, I. and Leinert, E. and Lato, K. and Polasik, A. and Schochter, F. and Singer, S.},
  title     = {To which extent do breast cancer survivors feel well informed about disease and treatment 5 years after diagnosis?},
  series = {Breast Cancer Research and Treatment},
  volume    = {185},
  journal   = {Breast Cancer Research and Treatment},
  organization    = {BRENDA study group},
  issn      = {0167-6806},
  doi       = {10.1007/s10549-020-05974-y},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-232356},
  pages     = {677-684},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Objective In this study, we investigated to which extent patients feel well informed about their disease and treatment, which areas they wish more or less information and which variables are associated with a need for information about the disease, medical tests and treatment. Methods In a German multi-centre prospective study, we enrolled 759 female breast cancer patients at the time of cancer diagnosis (baseline). Data on information were captured at 5 years after diagnosis with the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Information Module (EORTC QLQ-INFO24). Good information predictors were analysed using linear regression models. Results There were 456 patients who participated at the 5-year follow-up. They reported to feel well informed about medical tests (mean score 78.5) and the disease itself (69.3) but relatively poorly about other services (44.3) and about different places of care (31.3). The survivors expressed a need for more information concerning: side effects and long-term consequences of therapy, more information in general, information about aftercare, prognosis, complementary medicine, disease and therapy. Patients with higher incomes were better informed about medical tests (β 0.26, p 0.04) and worse informed with increasing levels of fear of treatment (β - 0.11, p 0.02). Information about treatment was reported to be worse by survivors > 70 years old (β -0.34, p 0.03) and by immigrants (β -0.11, p 0.02). Survivors who had received additional written information felt better informed about disease, medical tests, treatment and other services (β 0.19/0.19/0.20/0.25; each p < 0.01). Conclusion Health care providers have to reconsider how and what kind of information they provide. Providing written information, in addition to oral information, may improve meeting those information needs.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{MehnertKochSchulzetal.2012,
  author    = {Mehnert, Anja and Koch, Uwe and Schulz, Holger and Wegscheider, Karl and Weis, Joachim and Faller, Hermann and Keller, Monika and Br{\"a}hler, Elmar and H{\"a}rter, Martin},
  title     = {Prevalence of mental disorders, psychosocial distress and need for psychosocial support in cancer patients - study protocol of an epidemiological multi-center study},
  volume    = {12},
  number    = {70},
  doi       = {10.1186/1471-244X-12-70},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-153296},
  year      = {2012},
  abstract  = {Background Empirical studies investigating the prevalence of mental disorders and psychological distress in cancer patients have gained increasing importance during recent years, particularly with the objective to develop and implement psychosocial interventions within the cancer care system. Primary purpose of this epidemiological cross-sectional multi-center study is to detect the 4-week-, 12-month-, and lifetime prevalence rates of comorbid mental disorders and to further assess psychological distress and psychosocial support needs in cancer patients across all major tumor entities within the in- and outpatient oncological health care and rehabilitation settings in Germany. Methods/Design In this multicenter, epidemiological cross-sectional study, cancer patients across all major tumor entities will be enrolled from acute care hospitals, outpatient cancer care facilities, and rehabilitation centers in five major study centers in Germany: Freiburg, Hamburg, Heidelberg, Leipzig and W{\"u}rzburg. A proportional stratified random sample based on the nationwide incidence of all cancer diagnoses in Germany is used. Patients are consecutively recruited in all centers. On the basis of a depression screener (PHQ-9) 50\% of the participants that score below the cutoff point of 9 and all patients scoring above are assessed using the Composite International Diagnostic Interview for Oncology (CIDI-O). In addition, all patients complete validated questionnaires measuring emotional distress, information and psychosocial support needs as well as quality of life. Discussion Epidemiological data on the prevalence of mental disorders and distress provide detailed and valid information for the estimation of the demands for the type and extent of psychosocial support interventions. The data will provide information about specific demographic, functional, cancer- and treatment-related risk factors for mental comorbidity and psychosocial distress, specific supportive care needs and use of psychosocial support offers.},
  language  = {en}
}