@article{JordanHoelscherDohtFehskeetal.2015,
  author    = {Jordan, Martin C. and Hoelscher-Doht, Stefanie and Fehske, Kai and Gilbert, Fabian and Jansen, Hendrik and Meffert, Rainer H.},
  title     = {Bunnell or cross-lock Bunnell suture for tendon repair? Defining the biomechanical role of suture pretension},
  series = {Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research},
  volume    = {10},
  journal   = {Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research},
  number    = {192},
  doi       = {10.1186/s13018-015-0331-4},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-126262},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {Background Suture pretension during tendon repair is supposed to increase the resistance to gap formation. However, its effects on the Bunnell suture technique are unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the biomechanical effects of suture pretension on the Bunnell and cross-lock Bunnell techniques for tendon repair. Methods Eighty porcine hindlimb tendons were randomly assigned to four different tendon repair groups: those repaired with or without suture pretension using either a simple Bunnell or cross-lock Bunnell technique. Pretension was applied as a 10 \% shortening of the sutured tendon. After measuring the cross-sectional diameter at the repair site, static and cyclic biomechanical tests were conducted to evaluate the initial and 5-mm gap formation forces, elongation during cyclic loading, maximum tensile strength, and mode of failure. The suture failure mechanism was also separately assessed fluoroscopically in two tendons that were repaired with steel wire. Results Suture pretension was accompanied by a 10 to 15 \% increase in the tendon diameter at the repair site. Therefore, suture pretension with the Bunnell and cross-lock Bunnell repair techniques noticeably increased the resistance to initial gap formation and 5-mm gap formation. The tension-free cross-lock Bunnell repair demonstrated more resistance to initial and 5-mm gap formation, less elongation, and higher maximum tensile strength than the tension-free Bunnell repair technique. The only difference between the tensioned cross-lock Bunnell and tensioned Bunnell techniques was a larger resistance to 5-mm gap formation with the cross-lock Bunnell technique. Use of the simple instead of cross-lock suture configuration led to failure by suture cut out, as demonstrated fluoroscopically. Conclusion Based on these results, suture pretension decreases gapping and elongation after tendon repair, and those effects are stronger when using a cross-lock, rather than a regular Bunnell suture. However, pretension causes an unfavorable increase in the tendon diameter at the repair site, which may adversely affect wound healing.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{JordanHufnagelMcDonoghetal.2022,
  author    = {Jordan, Martin C. and Hufnagel, Lukas and McDonogh, Miriam and Paul, Mila M. and Schmalzl, Jonas and Kupczyk, Eva and Jansen, Hendrik and Heilig, Philipp and Meffert, Rainer H. and Hoelscher-Doht, Stefanie},
  title     = {Surgical fixation of calcaneal beak fractures — biomechanical analysis of different osteosynthesis techniques},
  series = {Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology},
  volume    = {10},
  journal   = {Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology},
  issn      = {2296-4185},
  doi       = {10.3389/fbioe.2022.896790},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-282792},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {The calcaneal beak fracture is a rare avulsion fracture of the tuber calcanei characterized by a solid bony fragment at the Achilles tendon insertion. Treatment usually requires osteosynthesis. However, lack of biomechanical understanding of the ideal fixation technique persists. A beak fracture was simulated in synthetic bones and assigned to five different groups of fixation: A) 6.5-mm partial threaded cannulated screws, B) 4.0-mm partial threaded cannulated screws, C) 5.0-mm headless cannulated compression screws, D) 2.3-mm locking plate, and E) 2.8-mm locking plate. Different traction force levels were applied through an Achilles tendon surrogate in a material-testing machine on all stabilized synthetic bones. Outcome measures were peak-to-peak displacement, total displacement, plastic deformation, stiffness, visual-fracture-line displacement, and mode of implant failure. The 2.3- and 2.8-mm plating groups showed a high drop-out rate at 100 N tension force and failed under higher tension levels of 200 N. The fracture fixation using 4.0-mm partial threaded screws showed a significantly higher repair strength and was able to withhold cyclic loading up to 300 N. The lowest peak-to-peak displacement and the highest load-to-failure and stiffness were provided by fracture fixation using 6.5-mm partial threaded cannulated screws or 5.0-mm headless cannulated compression screws. As anticipated, large 6.5-mm screw diameters provide the best biomechanical fixation. Surprisingly, the 5.0-mm headless cannulated compression screws yield reliable stability despite the absent screw head and washer. When such large screws cannot be applied, 4.0-mm screws also allow reasonable fixation strength. Plate fixation should be implemented with precaution and in combination with a restrictive postoperative motion protocol. Finally, clinical cases about the surgical application and recovery are included.},
  language  = {en}
}