@article{OervoessyKoroesiBataryetal.2014, author = {Oervoessy, Noemi and Koroesi, Adam and Batary, Peter and Vozar, Agnes and Peregovits, Laszlo}, title = {Habitat Requirements of the Protected Southern Festoon (Zerynthia Polysena); Adult, Egg and Larval Distribution in a Highly Degraded Habitat Complex}, series = {Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae}, volume = {60}, journal = {Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae}, number = {4}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-117810}, pages = {371-387}, year = {2014}, abstract = {Habitat quality affects the presence and size of butterfly populations. Resources for all life stages must be found in a given or few habitat patches. Southern festoon (Zerynthia polyxena) is a vulnerable, but locally abundant species in Hungary. The larva requires birthwort (Aristolochia clematitis) as food plant. We examined the small scale habitat use of adults and distribution of eggs and larvae among different vegetation types to reveal the requirements of the species in all life stages. Transect counts were conducted in a tree plantation complex comprising four types of vegetation. Number (+/- SE) of adults, eggs and larvae were lowest in poplar plantation (adult 0.3 +/- 0.2, egg 1.1 +/- 1.1, larva 0.6 +/- 0.3). Medium amount of butterflies were observed in open (adult 8.3 +/- 2.9, egg 3.1 +/- 2.6, larva 3.1 +/- 1.9) and black-locust (adult 9.4 +/- 4.2, egg 12.7 +/- 4.9, larva 4.1 +/- 1.1) habitat. Number of butterflies was highest in hummocks (adult 13.5 +/- 1.5, egg 12.9 +/- 5.7, larva 8.4 +/- 2.1). Adults avoided bare ground. We encountered most eggs in dense food plant patches with high plants. Food plant height also positively influenced the occurrence of the larvae. Although distribution of adults and juvenile forms showed quite similar patterns, we could also reveal some differences that caused by different environmental conditions in distinct vegetation types. Our study stresses the importance of habitat quality, which affects population size of butterflies even in a highly degraded habitat complex.}, language = {en} } @article{KaramustafalıoğluReifAtmacaetal.2014, author = {Karamustafal{\i}oğlu, Oğuz and Reif, Andreas and Atmaca, Murad and Gonzalez, Domingo and Moreno-Manzanaro, Miriam and Gonzalez, Miguel Angel and Medina, Esteban and Bellomo, Antonello}, title = {Hospital stay in patients admitted for acute bipolar manic episodes prescribed quetiapine immediate or extended release: a retrospective non-interventional cohort study (HOME)}, series = {BMC Psychiatry}, volume = {14}, journal = {BMC Psychiatry}, number = {246}, doi = {10.1186/s12888-014-0246-3}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-115547}, year = {2014}, abstract = {Background: Bipolar manic episodes often require hospital admission to ensure patient safety. The antipsychotic quetiapine is a common treatment for bipolar mania and is available in immediate release (IR) and extended release (XR) formulations; however, outcomes in patients receiving these different formulations have not been directly compared in an acute hospital setting. Methods: We conducted a multinational, observational, retrospective cohort study to describe and compare hospital stay in patients admitted for an acute bipolar manic episode treated with quetiapine IR or XR from 1 October 2009-1 October 2010. The primary outcome measure was comparison of length of stay (LOS) using zero-truncated negative binomial regression. Results: In total, 1230 patients were included (659 in the IR cohort; 571 in the XR cohort). The median LOS (interquartile range) was 18.0 days (12.0, 28.0) in the IR cohort and 20.0 days (12.0, 34.0) in the XR cohort, respectively. LOS was not significantly associated with quetiapine formulation irrespective of whether or not clinical characteristics were taken into account (p = 0.820 and p = 0.386, respectively). Overall, 84.2\% and 84.4\% of patients in the IR and XR cohorts, respectively, had not previously used quetiapine; of these patients, 78.7\% and 68.9\% received one total daily dose, and 14.4\% and 23.9\% received dose titration. Over half of patients received antipsychotic monotherapy (53.1\% and 58.3\% in the IR and XR cohorts, respectively) and most received a daily quetiapine dose >= 400 mg (64.9\% and 71.8\%, respectively, for quetiapine monotherapy and 59.9\% and 80.3\%, respectively, for combination treatment). As a secondary outcome, multivariate analysis was used to identify other factors that affect LOS. Factors associated with a longer hospital stay included public funding versus private, maximum number of new medications administered, did not receive lithium and did not receive anxiolytics, sedatives/hypnotics (all p < 0.0001). Factors associated with a shorter hospital stay included presence of drug/alcohol abuse, living accompanied and having a psychiatric medical history (all p < 0.05). Conclusions: LOS was not found to be associated with quetiapine formulation. However, most patients received only one total daily dose of quetiapine without dose titration, which was unexpected and contrary to current recommendations.}, language = {en} }