@article{FischerPlessowKiesel2013,
  author    = {Fischer, Rico and Plessow, Franziska and Kiesel, Andrea},
  title     = {The effects of alerting signals in masked priming},
  series = {Frontiers in Psychology},
  volume    = {4},
  journal   = {Frontiers in Psychology},
  number    = {448},
  issn      = {1664-1078},
  doi       = {10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00448},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-122581},
  year      = {2013},
  abstract  = {Alerting signals often serve to reduce temporal uncertainty by predicting the time of stimulus onset. The resulting response time benefits have often been explained by facilitated translation of stimulus codes into response codes on the basis of established stimulus-response (S-R) links. In paradigms of masked S-R priming alerting signals also modulate response activation processes triggered by subliminally presented prime stimuli. In the present study we tested whether facilitation of visuo-motor translation processes due to alerting signals critically depends on established S-R links. Alerting signals resulted in significantly enhanced masked priming effects for masked prime stimuli that included and that did not include established S-R links fi.e., target vs. novel primes). Yet, the alerting-priming interaction was more pronounced for target than for novel primes. These results suggest that effects of alerting signals on masked priming are especially evident when S-R links between prime and target exist. At the same time, an alerting-priming interaction also for novel primes suggests that alerting signals also facilitate stimulus-response translation processes when masked prime stimuli provide action-trigger conditions in terms of programmed S-R links.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{ZinnerMoralesAlamoOrtenbladetal.2016,
  author    = {Zinner, Christoph and Morales-Alamo, David and {\O}rtenblad, Niels and Larsen, Filip J. and Schiffer, Tomas A. and Willis, Sarah J. and Gelabert-Rebato, Miriam and Perez-Valera, Mario and Boushel, Robert and Calbet, Jose A. L. and Holmberg, Hans-Christer},
  title     = {The Physiological Mechanisms of Performance Enhancement with Sprint Interval Training Differ between the Upper and Lower Extremities in Humans},
  series = {Frontiers in Physiology},
  volume    = {7},
  journal   = {Frontiers in Physiology},
  number    = {426},
  doi       = {10.3389/fphys.2016.00426},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-165257},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {To elucidate the mechanisms underlying the differences in adaptation of arm and leg muscles to sprint training, over a period of 11 days 16 untrained men performed six sessions of 4-6 × 30-s all-out sprints (SIT) with the legs and arms, separately, with a 1-h interval of recovery. Limb-specific VO2peak, sprint performance (two 30-s Wingate tests with 4-min recovery), muscle efficiency and time-trial performance (TT, 5-min all-out) were assessed and biopsies from the m. vastus lateralis and m. triceps brachii taken before and after training. VO2peak and Wmax increased 3-11\% after training, with a more pronounced change in the arms (P < 0.05). Gross efficiency improved for the arms (+8.8\%, P < 0.05), but not the legs (-0.6\%). Wingate peak and mean power outputs improved similarly for the arms and legs, as did TT performance. After training, VO2 during the two Wingate tests was increased by 52 and 6\% for the arms and legs, respectively (P < 0.001). In the case of the arms, VO2 was higher during the first than second Wingate test (64 vs. 44\%, P < 0.05). During the TT, relative exercise intensity, HR, VO2, VCO2, VE, and Vt were all lower during arm-cranking than leg-pedaling, and oxidation of fat was minimal, remaining so after training. Despite the higher relative intensity, fat oxidation was 70\% greater during leg-pedaling (P = 0.017). The aerobic energy contribution in the legs was larger than for the arms during the Wingate tests, although VO2 for the arms was enhanced more by training, reducing the O2 deficit after SIT. The levels of muscle glycogen, as well as the myosin heavy chain composition were unchanged in both cases, while the activities of 3-hydroxyacyl-CoA-dehydrogenase and citrate synthase were elevated only in the legs and capillarization enhanced in both limbs. Multiple regression analysis demonstrated that the variables that predict TT performance differ for the arms and legs. The primary mechanism of adaptation to SIT by both the arms and legs is enhancement of aerobic energy production. However, with their higher proportion of fast muscle fibers, the arms exhibit greater plasticity.},
  language  = {en}
}