@misc{KosmalaGruschwitzVeldhoenetal.2022, author = {Kosmala, Aleksander and Gruschwitz, Philipp and Veldhoen, Simon and Weng, Andreas Max and Krauss, Bernhard and Bley, Thorsten Alexander and Petritsch, Bernhard}, title = {Correction to: Dual-energy CT angiography in suspected pulmonary embolism: infuence of injection protocols on image quality and perfused blood volume}, series = {The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging}, volume = {38}, journal = {The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging}, number = {3}, doi = {10.1007/s10554-021-02439-1}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-350830}, pages = {707}, year = {2022}, abstract = {No abstract available.}, language = {en} } @article{HuflageFieberFaerberetal.2022, author = {Huflage, Henner and Fieber, Tabea and F{\"a}rber, Christian and Knarr, Jonas and Veldhoen, Simon and Jordan, Martin C. and Gilbert, Fabian and Bley, Thorsten Alexander and Meffert, Rainer H. and Grunz, Jan-Peter and Schmalzl, Jonas}, title = {Interobserver reliability of scapula fracture classifications in intra- and extra-articular injury patterns}, series = {BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders}, volume = {23}, journal = {BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders}, number = {1}, doi = {10.1186/s12891-022-05146-7}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-299795}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Background Morphology and glenoid involvement determine the necessity of surgical management in scapula fractures. While being present in only a small share of patients with shoulder trauma, numerous classification systems have been in use over the years for categorization of scapula fractures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the established AO/OTA classification in comparison to the classification system of Euler and R{\"u}edi (ER) with regard to interobserver reliability and confidence in clinical practice. Methods Based on CT imaging, 149 patients with scapula fractures were retrospectively categorized by two trauma surgeons and two radiologists using the classification systems of ER and AO/OTA. To measure the interrater reliability, Fleiss kappa (κ) was calculated independently for both fracture classifications. Rater confidence was stated subjectively on a five-point scale and compared with Wilcoxon signed rank tests. Additionally, we computed the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) based on absolute agreement in a two-way random effects model to assess the diagnostic confidence agreement between observers. Results In scapula fractures involving the glenoid fossa, interrater reliability was substantial (κ = 0.722; 95\% confidence interval [CI] 0.676-0.769) for the AO/OTA classification in contrast to moderate agreement (κ = 0.579; 95\% CI 0.525-0.634) for the ER classification system. Diagnostic confidence for intra-articular fracture patterns was superior using the AO/OTA classification compared to ER (p < 0.001) with higher confidence agreement (ICC: 0.882 versus 0.831). For extra-articular fractures, ER (κ = 0.817; 95\% CI 0.771-0.863) provided better interrater reliability compared to AO/OTA (κ = 0.734; 95\% CI 0.692-0.776) with higher diagnostic confidence (p < 0.001) and superior agreement between confidence ratings (ICC: 0.881 versus 0.912). Conclusions The AO/OTA classification is most suitable to categorize intra-articular scapula fractures with glenoid involvement, whereas the classification system of Euler and R{\"u}edi appears to be superior in extra-articular injury patterns with fractures involving only the scapula body, spine, acromion and coracoid process.}, language = {en} } @article{SchmidLoisMetzetal.2022, author = {Schmid, Andrea and Lois, Anna-Maria and Metz, Corona and Grunz, Jan-Peter and Veldhoen, Simon}, title = {Not all that looks fractured is broken - multipartite humeral epicondyles in children}, series = {European Radiology}, volume = {32}, journal = {European Radiology}, number = {8}, doi = {10.1007/s00330-022-08670-1}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-324987}, pages = {5045-5052}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Objective Multipartite epicondyles may mimic fractures in the setting of pediatric elbow trauma. This study examines the prevalence of multipartite epicondyles during skeletal development and their association with pediatric elbow fractures. Materials and methods In this retrospective analysis, 4282 elbow radiographs of 1265 elbows of 1210 patients aged 0-17 years were reviewed. The radiographs were analyzed by two radiologists in consensus reading, and the number of visible portions of the medial and lateral epicondyles was noted. For elbows in which epicondylar ossification was not yet visible, the epicondyles were already fused with the humerus or could not be sufficiently evaluated due to projection issues or because osteosynthesis material was excluded. In total, 187 elbows were included for the lateral and 715 for the medial epicondyle analyses. Results No multipartite medial epicondyles were found in patients without history of elbow fracture, whereas 9\% of these patients had multipartite lateral epicondyles (p < 0.01). Current or previous elbow fractures increased the prevalence of multipartite epicondyles, with significant lateral predominance (medial epicondyle + 9\% vs. lateral + 24\%, p < 0.0001). Including all patients regardless of a history of elbow fracture, multipartite medial epicondyles were observed in 3\% and multipartite lateral epicondyles in 18\% (p < 0.0001). There was no gender difference in the prevalence of multipartition of either epicondyle, regardless of a trauma history. Conclusion Multipartite medial epicondyles occur in patients with current or previous elbow fractures only, whereas multipartite lateral epicondyles may be constitutional. Elbow fractures increase the prevalence of multipartite epicondyles on both sides, with significant lateral predominance. Key Points • Multipartite medial epicondyles should be considered of traumatic origin. • Multipartite lateral epicondyles may be constitutional. • Elbow fractures increase the prevalence of multipartite epicondyles on both sides with lateral predominance.}, language = {en} }