@article{SuratVogelWiegeringetal.2021,
  author    = {Surat, G{\"u}zin and Vogel, Ulrich and Wiegering, Armin and Germer, Christoph-Thomas and Lock, Johan Friso},
  title     = {Defining the scope of antimicrobial stewardship interventions on the prescription quality of antibiotics for surgical intra-abdominal infections},
  series = {Antibiotics},
  volume    = {10},
  journal   = {Antibiotics},
  number    = {1},
  issn      = {2079-6382},
  doi       = {10.3390/antibiotics10010073},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-223034},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Background: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of antimicrobial stewardship interventions on surgical antibiotic prescription behavior in the management of non-elective surgical intra-abdominal infections, focusing on postoperative antibiotic use, including the appropriateness of indications. Methods: A single-center quality improvement study with retrospective evaluation of the impact of antimicrobial stewardship measures on optimizing antibacterial use in intra-abdominal infections requiring emergency surgery was performed. The study was conducted in a tertiary hospital in Germany from January 1, 2016, to January 30, 2020, three years after putting a set of antimicrobial stewardship standards into effect. Results: 767 patients were analyzed (n = 495 in 2016 and 2017, the baseline period; n = 272 in 2018, the antimicrobial stewardship period). The total days of therapy per 100 patient days declined from 47.0 to 42.2 days (p = 0.035). The rate of patients receiving postoperative therapy decreased from 56.8\% to 45.2\% (p = 0.002), comparing both periods. There was a significant decline in the rate of inappropriate indications (17.4\% to 8.1 \%, p = 0.015) as well as a significant change from broad-spectrum to narrow-spectrum antibiotic use (28.8\% to 6.5\%, p ≤ 0.001) for postoperative therapy. The significant decline in antibiotic use did not affect either clinical outcomes or the rate of postoperative wound complications. Conclusions: Postoperative antibiotic use for intra-abdominal infections could be significantly reduced by antimicrobial stewardship interventions. The identification of inappropriate indications remains a key target for antimicrobial stewardship programs.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SuratBernsenSchimmer2021,
  author    = {Surat, G{\"u}zin and Bernsen, Dominik and Schimmer, Christoph},
  title     = {Antimicrobial stewardship measures in cardiac surgery and its impact on surgical site infections},
  series = {Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery},
  volume    = {16},
  journal   = {Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery},
  doi       = {10.1186/s13019-021-01693-7},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-265533},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Objective The goal of this study was to monitor the compliance and impact on a protocol change of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in cardiac surgery favouring cefazolin instead cefuroxime, initiated by the hospital's antimicrobial stewardship team. Methods This quality improvement study was performed in a tertiary care hospital in collaboration with the department of cardiothoracic surgery and the hospitals antimicrobial stewardship team following a revision of the standard for surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis including 1029 patients who underwent cardiac surgery. 582 patients receiving cefuroxime and 447 patients receiving cefazolin respectively were compared without altering any other preventative perioperative measures including its postoperative duration of less than 24 h. Adherence and surgical site infections were compiled and analysed. Results A complete adherence was achieved. Overall surgical site infections occurred in 37 (3.6\%) of the cases, 20 (3.4\%) in cefuroxime patients and 17 (3.8\%) in cefazolin patients (p value = 0.754). No statistically significant differences could be found in any of the primary endpoints, but there was a trend towards less deep sternal wound infections in the cefazolin group. Conclusions The study supports the role of antimicrobial stewardship in cardiac surgery and mirrors the success of a multidisciplinary team aiming to minimize adverse events by optimizing antibiotic use.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SchraderRieseKurlbaumetal.2021,
  author    = {Schrader, Nikolas and Riese, Thorsten and Kurlbaum, Max and Meybohm, Patrick and Kredel, Markus and Surat, G{\"u}zin and Scherf-Clavel, Oliver and Strate, Alexander and Pospiech, Andreas and Hoppe, Kerstin},
  title     = {Personalized antibiotic therapy for the critically ill: Implementation strategies and effects on clinical outcome of piperacillin therapeutic drug monitoring — a descriptive retrospective analysis},
  series = {Antibiotics},
  volume    = {10},
  journal   = {Antibiotics},
  number    = {12},
  issn      = {2079-6382},
  doi       = {10.3390/antibiotics10121452},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-250052},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is increasingly relevant for an individualized antibiotic therapy and subsequently a necessary tool to reduce multidrug-resistant pathogens, especially in light of diminishing antimicrobial capabilities. Critical illness is associated with profound pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic alterations, which challenge dose finding and the application of particularly hydrophilic drugs such as β-lactam antibiotics. Methods: Implementation strategy, potential benefit, and practicability of the developed standard operating procedures were retrospectively analyzed from January to December 2020. Furthermore, the efficacy of the proposed dosing target of piperacillin in critically ill patients was evaluated. Results: In total, 160 patients received piperacillin/tazobactam therapy and were subsequently included in the study. Of them, 114 patients received piperacillin/tazobactam by continuous infusion and had at least one measurement of piperacillin serum level according to the standard operating procedure. In total, 271 measurements were performed with an average level of 79.0 ± 46.0 mg/L. Seventy-one piperacillin levels exceeded 100 mg/L and six levels were lower than 22.5 mg/L. The high-level and the low-level group differed significantly in infection laboratory parameters (CRP (mg/dL) 20.18 ± 11.71 vs. 5.75 ± 5.33) and renal function [glomerular filtration rate (mL/min/1.75 m2) 40.85 ± 26.74 vs. 120.50 ± 70.48]. Conclusions: Piperacillin levels are unpredictable in critically ill patients. TDM during piperacillin/tazobactam therapy is highly recommended for all patients. Although our implementation strategy was effective, further strategies implemented into the daily clinical workflow might support the health care staff and increase the clinicians' alertness.},
  language  = {en}
}