@inproceedings{OPUS4-30171, title = {Digitalization as a challenge for justice and administration}, editor = {Ludwigs, Markus and Muriel Ciceri, Jos{\´e} Hern{\´a}n and Velling, Annika}, publisher = {W{\"u}rzburg University Press}, address = {W{\"u}rzburg}, isbn = {978-3-95826-200-3}, issn = {2941-2854}, doi = {10.25972/WUP-978-3-95826-201-0}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-301717}, pages = {VIII, 153}, year = {2023}, abstract = {Digitalization is one of the global challenges for justice and This volume documents the presentations of a multilingual online conference on "Digitalization as a challenge for justice and administration" held in March 2022. The contributions of the international team of authors provide insights into central issues of this highly relevant subject from African, Japanese, U.S., Swiss, Latin American and German perspectives. The result is a multifaceted picture of digitalization in the context of public, private and even criminal law.}, subject = {Digitalisierung}, language = {mul} } @inproceedings{FoerstnerHagedornKoltzenburgetal.2011, author = {F{\"o}rstner, Konrad and Hagedorn, Gregor and Koltzenburg, Claudia and Kubke, Fabiana and Mietchen, Daniel}, title = {Collaborative platforms for streamlining workflows in Open Science}, series = {Proceedings of the 6th Open Knowledge Conference}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the 6th Open Knowledge Conference}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-101678}, year = {2011}, abstract = {Despite the internet's dynamic and collaborative nature, scientists continue to produce grant proposals, lab notebooks, data files, conclusions etc. that stay in static formats or are not published online and therefore not always easily accessible to the interested public. Because of limited adoption of tools that seamlessly integrate all aspects of a research project (conception, data generation, data evaluation, peerreviewing and publishing of conclusions), much effort is later spent on reproducing or reformatting individual entities before they can be repurposed independently or as parts of articles. We propose that workflows - performed both individually and collaboratively - could potentially become more efficient if all steps of the research cycle were coherently represented online and the underlying data were formatted, annotated and licensed for reuse. Such a system would accelerate the process of taking projects from conception to publication stages and allow for continuous updating of the data sets and their interpretation as well as their integration into other independent projects. A major advantage of such work ows is the increased transparency, both with respect to the scientific process as to the contribution of each participant. The latter point is important from a perspective of motivation, as it enables the allocation of reputation, which creates incentives for scientists to contribute to projects. Such work ow platforms offering possibilities to fine-tune the accessibility of their content could gradually pave the path from the current static mode of research presentation into a more coherent practice of open science.}, language = {en} }