@article{ProetelPletschLausekeretal.2014,
  author    = {Proetel, Ulrike and Pletsch, Nadine and Lauseker, Michael and M{\"u}ller, Martin C. and Hanfstein, Benjamin and Krause, Stefan W. and Kalmanti, Lida and Schreiber, Annette and Heim, Dominik and Baerlocher, Gabriela M. and Hofmann, Wolf-Karsten and Lange, Elisabeth and Einsele, Hermann and Wernli, Martin and Kremers, Stephan and Schlag, Rudolf and M{\"u}ller, Lothar and H{\"a}nel, Mathias and Link, Hartmut and Hertenstein, Bernd and Pfirrmann, Markus and Hochhaus, Andreas and Hasford, Joerg and Hehlmann, R{\"u}diger and Saußele, Susanne},
  title     = {Older patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (≥65 years) profit more from higher imatinib doses than younger patients: a subanalysis of the randomized CML-Study IV},
  series = {Annals of Hematology},
  volume    = {93},
  journal   = {Annals of Hematology},
  number    = {7},
  issn      = {0939-5555},
  doi       = {10.1007/s00277-014-2041-0},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-121574},
  pages     = {1167-76},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {The impact of imatinib dose on response rates and survival in older patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase has not been studied well. We analyzed data from the German CML-Study IV, a randomized five-arm treatment optimization study in newly diagnosed BCR-ABL-positive chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase. Patients randomized to imatinib 400 mg/day (IM400) or imatinib 800 mg/day (IM800) and stratified according to age (≥65 years vs. <65 years) were compared regarding dose, response, adverse events, rates of progression, and survival. The full 800 mg dose was given after a 6-week run-in period with imatinib 400 mg/day. The dose could then be reduced according to tolerability. A total of 828 patients were randomized to IM400 or IM800. Seven hundred eighty-four patients were evaluable (IM400, 382; IM800, 402). One hundred ten patients (29 \%) on IM400 and 83 (21 \%) on IM800 were ≥65 years. The median dose per day was lower for patients ≥65 years on IM800, with the highest median dose in the first year (466 mg/day for patients ≥65 years vs. 630 mg/day for patients <65 years). Older patients on IM800 achieved major molecular remission and deep molecular remission as fast as younger patients, in contrast to standard dose imatinib with which older patients achieved remissions much later than younger patients. Grades 3 and 4 adverse events were similar in both age groups. Five-year relative survival for older patients was comparable to that of younger patients. We suggest that the optimal dose for older patients is higher than 400 mg/day. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00055874},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{MoussetBuchheidtHeinzetal.2014,
  author    = {Mousset, Sabine and Buchheidt, Dieter and Heinz, Werner and Ruhnke, Markus and Cornely, Oliver A. and Egerer, Gerlinde and Kr{\"u}ger, William and Link, Hartmut and Neumann, Silke and Ostermann, Helmut and Panse, Jens and Penack, Olaf and Rieger, Christina and Schmidt-Hieber, Martin and Silling, Gerda and S{\"u}dhoff, Thomas and Ullmann, Andrew J. and Wolf, Hans-Heinrich and Maschmeyer, Georg and B{\"o}hme, Angelika},
  title     = {Treatment of invasive fungal infections in cancer patients—updated recommendations of the Infectious Diseases Working Party (AGIHO) of the German Society of Hematology and Oncology (DGHO)},
  series = {Annals of Hematology},
  volume    = {96},
  journal   = {Annals of Hematology},
  doi       = {10.1007/s00277-013-1867-1},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-121340},
  pages     = {13-32},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {Invasive fungal infections are a main cause of morbidity and mortality in cancer patients undergoing intensive chemotherapy regimens. Early antifungal treatment is mandatory to improve survival. Today, a number of effective and better-tolerated but more expensive antifungal agents compared to the former gold standard amphotericin B deoxycholate are available. Clinical decision-making must consider results from numerous studies and published guidelines, as well as licensing status and cost pressure. New developments in antifungal prophylaxis improving survival rates result in a continuous need for actualization. The treatment options for invasive Candida infections include fluconazole, voriconazole, and amphotericin B and its lipid formulations, as well as echinocandins. Voriconazole, amphotericin B, amphotericin B lipid formulations, caspofungin, itraconazole, and posaconazole are available for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis. Additional procedures, such as surgical interventions, immunoregulatory therapy, and granulocyte transfusions, have to be considered. The Infectious Diseases Working Party of the German Society of Hematology and Oncology here presents its 2008 recommendations discussing the dos and do-nots, as well as the problems and possible solutions, of evidence criteria selection.},
  language  = {en}
}