@article{GaletzkaHansmannElHajjetal.2012, author = {Galetzka, Danuta and Hansmann, Tamara and El Hajj, Nady and Weis, Eva and Irmscher, Benjamin and Ludwig, Marco and Schneider-R{\"a}tzke, Brigitte and Kohlschmidt, Nicolai and Beyer, Vera and Bartsch, Oliver and Zechner, Ulrich and Spix, Claudia and Haaf, Thomas}, title = {Monozygotic twins discordant for constitutive BRCA1 promoter methylation, childhood cancer and secondary cancer}, series = {Epigenetics}, volume = {7}, journal = {Epigenetics}, number = {1}, doi = {10.4161/epi.7.1.18814}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-125386}, pages = {47-54}, year = {2012}, abstract = {We describe monozygotic twins discordant for childhood leukemia and secondary thyroid carcinoma. We used bisulfite pyrosequencing to compare the constitutive promoter methylation of BRCA1 and several other tumor suppressor genes in primary fibroblasts. The affected twin displayed an increased BRCA1 methylation (12\%), compared with her sister (3\%). Subsequent bisulfite plasmid sequencing demonstrated that 13\% (6 of 47) BRCA1 alleles were fully methylated in the affected twin, whereas her sister displayed only single CpG errors without functional implications. This between-twin methylation difference was also found in irradiated fibroblasts and untreated saliva cells. The BRCA1 epimutation may have originated by an early somatic event in the affected twin: approximately 25\% of her body cells derived from different embryonic cell lineages carry one epigenetically inactivated BRCA1 allele. This epimutation was associated with reduced basal protein levels and a higher induction of BRCA1 after DNA damage. In addition, we performed a genome-wide microarray analysis of both sisters and found several copy number variations, i.e., heterozygous deletion and reduced expression of the RSPO3 gene in the affected twin. This monozygotic twin pair represents an impressive example of epigenetic somatic mosaicism, suggesting a role for constitutive epimutations, maybe along with de novo genetic alterations in recurrent tumor development.}, language = {en} } @article{SchneiderPliushchElHajjetal.2010, author = {Schneider, Eberhard and Pliushch, Galyna and El Hajj, Nady and Galetzka, Danuta and Puhl, Alexander and Schorsch, Martin and Frauenknecht, Katrin and Riepert, Thomas and Tresch, Achim and Mueller, Annette M. and Coerdt, Wiltrud and Zechner, Ulrich and Haaf, Thomas}, title = {Spatial, temporal and interindividual epigenetic variation of functionally important DNA methylation patterns}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-68371}, year = {2010}, abstract = {DNA methylation is an epigenetic modification that plays an important role in gene regulation. It can be influenced by stochastic events, environmental factors and developmental programs. However, little is known about the natural variation of genespecific methylation patterns. In this study, we performed quantitative methylation analyses of six differentially methylated imprinted genes (H19, MEG3, LIT1, NESP55, PEG3 and SNRPN), one hypermethylated pluripotency gene (OCT4) and one hypomethylated tumor suppressor gene (APC) in chorionic villus, fetal and adult cortex, and adult blood samples. Both average methylation level and range of methylation variation depended on the gene locus, tissue type and/or developmental stage. We found considerable variability of functionally important methylation patterns among unrelated healthy individuals and a trend toward more similar methylation levels in monozygotic twins than in dizygotic twins. Imprinted genes showed relatively little methylation changes associated with aging in individuals who are >25 years. The relative differences in methylation among neighboring CpGs in the generally hypomethylated APC promoter may not only reflect stochastic fluctuations but also depend on the tissue type. Our results are consistent with the view that most methylation variation may arise after fertilization, leading to epigenetic mosaicism.}, subject = {Medizin}, language = {en} }