@article{PfeifferGoetzXiangetal.2013,
  author    = {Pfeiffer, Verena and G{\"o}tz, Rudolf and Xiang, Chaomei and Camarero, Guadelupe and Braun, Attila and Zhang, Yina and Blum, Robert and Heinsen, Helmut and Nieswandt, Bernhard and Rapp, Ulf R.},
  title     = {Ablation of BRaf Impairs Neuronal Differentiation in the Postnatal Hippocampus and Cerebellum},
  series = {PLoS ONE},
  volume    = {8},
  journal   = {PLoS ONE},
  number    = {3},
  doi       = {10.1371/journal.pone.0058259},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-130304},
  pages     = {e58259},
  year      = {2013},
  abstract  = {This study focuses on the role of the kinase BRaf in postnatal brain development. Mice expressing truncated, non-functional BRaf in neural stem cell-derived brain tissue demonstrate alterations in the cerebellum, with decreased sizes and fuzzy borders of the glomeruli in the granule cell layer. In addition we observed reduced numbers and misplaced ectopic Purkinje cells that showed an altered structure of their dendritic arborizations in the hippocampus, while the overall cornus ammonis architecture appeared to be unchanged. In male mice lacking BRaf in the hippocampus the size of the granule cell layer was normal at postnatal day 12 (P12) but diminished at P21, as compared to control littermates. This defect was caused by a reduced ability of dentate gyrus progenitor cells to differentiate into NeuN positive granule cell neurons. In vitro cell culture of P0/P1 hippocampal cells revealed that BRaf deficient cells were impaired in their ability to form microtubule-associated protein 2 positive neurons. Together with the alterations in behaviour, such as autoaggression and loss of balance fitness, these observations indicate that in the absence of BRaf all neuronal cellular structures develop, but neuronal circuits in the cerebellum and hippocampus are partially disturbed besides impaired neuronal generation in both structures.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BorchersMuellerSynofziketal.2013,
  author    = {Borchers, Svenja and M{\"u}ller, Laura and Synofzik, Matthis and Himmelbach, Marc},
  title     = {Guidelines and quality measures for the diagnosis of optic ataxia},
  series = {Frontiers in Human Neuroscience},
  volume    = {7},
  journal   = {Frontiers in Human Neuroscience},
  number    = {324},
  issn      = {1662-5161},
  doi       = {10.3389/fnhum.2013.00324},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-122439},
  year      = {2013},
  abstract  = {Since the first description of a systematic mis-reaching by Balint in 1909, a reasonable number of patients showing a similar phenomenology, later termed optic ataxia (OA), has been described. However, there is surprising inconsistency regarding the behavioral measures that are used to detect OA in experimental and clinical reports, if the respective measures are reported at all. A typical screening method that was presumably used by most researchers and clinicians, reaching for a target object in the peripheral visual space, has never been evaluated. We developed a set of instructions and evaluation criteria for the scoring of a semi-standardized version of this reaching task. We tested 36 healthy participants, a group of 52 acute and chronic stroke patients, and 24 patients suffering from cerebellar ataxia. We found a high interrater reliability and a moderate test-retest reliability comparable to other clinical instruments in the stroke sample. The calculation of cut-off thresholds based on healthy control and cerebellar patient data showed an unexpected high number of false positives in these samples due to individual outliers that made a considerable number of errors in peripheral reaching. This study provides first empirical data from large control and patient groups for a screening procedure that seems to be widely used but rarely explicitly reported and prepares the grounds for its use as a standard tool for the description of patients who are included in single case or group studies addressing optic ataxia similar to the use of neglect, extinction, or apraxia screening tools.},
  language  = {en}
}