@phdthesis{Sickel2016, author = {Sickel, Wiebke}, title = {High-throughput biodiversity assessment - Powers and limitations of meta-barcoding}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-144573}, school = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg}, year = {2016}, abstract = {Traditional species identification based on morphological characters is laborious and requires expert knowledge. It is further complicated in the case of species assemblages or degraded and processed material. DNA-barcoding, species identification based on genetic data, has become a suitable alternative, yet species assemblages are still difficult to study. In the past decade meta-barcoding has widely been adopted for the study of species communities, due to technological advances in modern sequencing platforms and because manual separation of individual specimen is not required. Here, meta-barcoding is put into context and applied to the study of bee-collected pollen as well as bacterial communities. These studies provide the basis for a critical evaluation of the powers and limitations of meta-barcoding. Advantages identified include species identification without the need for expert knowledge as well as the high throughput of samples and sequences. In microbiology, meta-barcoding can facilitate directed cultivation of taxa of interest identified with meta-barcoding data. Disadvantages include insufficient species resolution due to short read lengths and incomplete reference databases, as well as limitations in abundance estimation of taxa and functional profiling. Despite these, meta-barcoding is a powerful method for the analysis of species communities and holds high potential especially for automated biomonitoring.}, subject = {Biodiversit{\"a}t}, language = {en} }