@article{CoelhoKultimaCosteaetal.2018,
  author    = {Coelho, Luis Pedro and Kultima, Jens Roat and Costea, Paul Igor and Fournier, Coralie and Pan, Yuanlong and Czarnecki-Maulden, Gail and Hayward, Matthew Robert and Forslund, Sofia K. and Schmidt, Thomas Sebastian Benedikt and Descombes, Patrick and Jackson, Janet R. and Li, Qinghong and Bork, Peer},
  title     = {Similarity of the dog and human gut microbiomes in gene content and response to diet},
  series = {Microbiome},
  volume    = {6},
  journal   = {Microbiome},
  doi       = {10.1186/s40168-018-0450-3},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-223177},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {Background Gut microbes influence their hosts in many ways, in particular by modulating the impact of diet. These effects have been studied most extensively in humans and mice. In this work, we used whole genome metagenomics to investigate the relationship between the gut metagenomes of dogs, humans, mice, and pigs. Results We present a dog gut microbiome gene catalog containing 1,247,405 genes (based on 129 metagenomes and a total of 1.9 terabasepairs of sequencing data). Based on this catalog and taxonomic abundance profiling, we show that the dog microbiome is closer to the human microbiome than the microbiome of either pigs or mice. To investigate this similarity in terms of response to dietary changes, we report on a randomized intervention with two diets (high-protein/low-carbohydrate vs. lower protein/higher carbohydrate). We show that diet has a large and reproducible effect on the dog microbiome, independent of breed or sex. Moreover, the responses were in agreement with those observed in previous human studies. Conclusions We conclude that findings in dogs may be predictive of human microbiome results. In particular, a novel finding is that overweight or obese dogs experience larger compositional shifts than lean dogs in response to a high-protein diet.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{HendriksmaHaertelSteffanDewenter2011,
  author    = {Hendriksma, Harmen P. and H{\"a}rtel, Stephan and Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf},
  title     = {Testing Pollen of Single and Stacked Insect-Resistant Bt-Maize on In vitro Reared Honey Bee Larvae},
  series = {PLoS One},
  volume    = {6},
  journal   = {PLoS One},
  number    = {12},
  doi       = {10.1371/journal.pone.0028174},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-137803},
  pages     = {e28174},
  year      = {2011},
  abstract  = {The ecologically and economic important honey bee (Apis mellifera) is a key non-target arthropod species in environmental risk assessment (ERA) of genetically modified (GM) crops. Honey bee larvae are directly exposed to transgenic products by the consumption of GM pollen. But most ERA studies only consider responses of adult bees, although Bt-proteins primarily affect the larval phases of target organisms. We adopted an in vitro larvae rearing system, to assess lethal and sublethal effects of Bt-pollen consumption in a standardized eco-toxicological bioassay. The effects of pollen from two Bt-maize cultivars, one expressing a single and the other a total of three Bt-proteins, on the survival and prepupae weight of honey bee larvae were analyzed. The control treatments included pollen from three non-transgenic maize varieties and of Heliconia rostrata. Three days old larvae were fed the realistic exposure dose of 2 mg pollen within the semi-artificial diet. The larvae were monitored over 120 h, until the prepupal stage, where larvae terminate feeding and growing. Neither single nor stacked Bt-maize pollen showed an adverse effect on larval survival and the prepupal weight. In contrast, feeding of H. rostrata pollen caused significant toxic effects. The results of this study indicate that pollen of the tested Bt-varieties does not harm the development of in vitro reared A. mellifera larvae. To sustain the ecosystem service of pollination, Bt-impact on A. mellifera should always be a crucial part of regulatory biosafety assessments. We suggest that our approach of feeding GM pollen on in vitro reared honey bee larvae is well suited of becoming a standard bioassay in regulatory risk assessments schemes of GM crops.},
  language  = {en}
}