@phdthesis{Knuth2004,
  author    = {Knuth, Karin},
  title     = {Identifizierung von essentiellen Genen in Salmonella typhimurium und Listeria monocytogenes durch Genom-weite Insertions-Duplikations-Mutagenese},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-10003},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2004},
  abstract  = {Die in dieser Arbeit etablierte Insertions-Duplikations-Mutagenese IDM erm{\"o}glicht es, das Genom von pathogenen Bakterien zu mutagenisieren und die so generierte Mutantenbank im high-throughput-Format auf Gene zu untersuchen, die unter bestimmten Bedingungen f{\"u}r das infekti{\"o}se Potential oder f{\"u}r das {\"U}berleben dieser Keime von Bedeutung sind. Die Grundlage von IDM bildet ein konditional replizierender Vektor, in den eine Genbank des Wirtsorganismus kloniert wird und der unter nicht-permissiven Replikationsbedingungen mittels homologer Rekombination ins Chromosom integriert und dadurch einen Gen-Knockout bedingt. Das IDM-Verfahren weist gegen{\"u}ber der Transposon-Mutagenese den Vorteil auf, dass das Genom nach dem Zufallsprinzip saturierend mutagenisiert werden kann und dass keine hot spots f{\"u}r die Insertion auftreten. Dar{\"u}ber hinaus kann der mutierte Genlocus nach Screening der Mutanten schnell per PCR identifiziert werden, indem die Exzision des Vektors induziert und das klonierte, homologe Fragment sequenziert wird. Die Insertion des Vektors ins Chromosom und damit der Gen-Knockout ist selbst ohne Selektionsdruck sehr stabil, so dass die Mutanten im Zellkultur- oder Tier-System untersucht werden k{\"o}nnen. IDM wurde im Rahmen dieser Arbeit erfolgreich auf Salmonella enterica Serovar typhimurium und Listeria monocytogenes angewandt. Die Applikation von IDM auf S. typhimurium hatte zum Ziel, Gene zu identifizieren, deren Produkte f{\"u}r das {\"U}berleben dieses Gram-negativen Keims in Vollmedium unter Laborbedingungen essentiell sind. Ausgehend von 14.000 S. typhimurium Fragmentbank-Klonen konnten durch Induktion der Integration des Vektors 262 Klone identifiziert werden, f{\"u}r welche die Mutation zu einem lethalen Ph{\"a}notyp f{\"u}hrte. 116 der 262 entsprechenden Proteine konnte durch IDM erstmalig eine essentielle Funktion f{\"u}r die Vitalit{\"a}t von S. typhimurium zugewiesen werden. Darunter befinden sich sowohl Proteine, die homolog sind zu Proteinen anderer klinisch-relevanter Keime, als auch Proteine, die Salmonella-spezifisch sind. Der gr{\"o}ßte Teil der identifizierten Proteine ist in die Speicherung und Weitergabe von Information (Transkription, Translation, DNA-Reparatur etc.) involviert, viele sind allerdings auch Proteine unbekannter Funktion. Die Essentialit{\"a}t der durch IDM identifizierten Gene konnte durch die Konstruktion von konditional lethalen Mutanten best{\"a}tigt werden. IDM ist demnach das erste Mutagenese-Verfahren, welches das essentielle Gen-Set von S. typhimurium f{\"u}r das {\"U}berleben in Vollmedium zu definieren vermochte. Basierend auf den IDM Daten konnte es auf 511 Gene, d.h. auf 11 \% des Gesamt-Genoms beziffert werden. Bei der Applikation von IDM auf L. monocytogenes lag der Fokus auf der Identifizierung von Genen, die f{\"u}r das {\"U}berleben dieses Gram-positiven Bakteriums im Zytosol von eukaryontischen Zellen von Bedeutung sind. Im Screening von bis dato 720 der 1491 L. monocytogenes Insertionsmutanten auf ein attenuiertes Replikationsverhalten in Caco-2 Zellen konnten 69 Mutanten selektioniert werden. In diesen Mutanten sind Gene ausgeknockt, deren Produkte haupts{\"a}chlich wichtige Funktionen in der N{\"a}hrstoffbereitstellung, in der Energiesynthese und im Metabolismus inne haben. Mit der Insertions-Duplikations-Mutagenese IDM steht ein molekulares Werkzeug zur Verf{\"u}gung, welches f{\"u}r die Identifzierung neuer targets f{\"u}r sowohl Breitband- als auch Spezies-spezifische Antiinfektiva eingesetzt werden kann und welches unbekannten Proteinen eine biologische Funktionen zuweisen kann.},
  subject      = {Salmonella typhimurium},
  language  = {de}
}
@phdthesis{Rapp2004,
  author    = {Rapp, Ulrike},
  title     = {Achieving protective immunitity against intracellular bacterial pathogens : a study on the efficiency of Gp96 as a vaccine carrier},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-9096},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2004},
  abstract  = {Protective vaccination against intracellular pathogens using HSP fusion proteins in the listeria model.},
  subject      = {Listeria monocytogenes},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Luo2004,
  author    = {Luo, Qin},
  title     = {Essential features of a PrfA-dependent : promoter of Listeria monocytogenes},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-10341},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2004},
  abstract  = {The gram-positive, facultative intracellular pathogen Listeria monocytogenes is the causal agent of listeriosis. Most of well-known virulence genes are controlled by PrfA that belongs to the Crp-Fnr family of transcriptional activators. A PrfA-mediated transcription initiating at a virulence gene promoter, inlC promoter (PinlC) that regulates the expression of the small, secreted internalin C, was in-depth characterized by an in vitro transcription system to unravel the essential features of a PrfA-dependent promoter in this study. The obtained results indicate a dual promoter for inlC that leads to PrfA-dependent and -independent transcription in vitro and in vivo. The PrfA-dependent transcription requires, as expected, the PrfA-box, a conserved 14 bp sequence of dyad symmetry located about 40 bp upstream of the transcriptional start site of each PrfA-regulated gene. Another important structural feature for this PrfA-dependent promoter is the distance between the 3´-end of the PrfA-box and the 5´-end of the SigA-recognized -10 box fixed to 22 or 23 bp, which is observed in the interspace regions of the other known PrfA-dependent promoters, e.g. PactA, PplcA, Phly and Pmpl. The -35 box of PinlC is not necessary for PrfA-dependent transcription. The -10 box of PinlC and also that of the other PrfA-dependent promoters of L. monocytogenes closely resemble SigA-recognized -10 promoter sequences of the well-characterized gram-positive bacterium B. subtilis. Even the extended -10 motif (5´-TRTG-3´) considered to be a basic element for many SigA-recognized promoters in B. subtilis is present in PinlC. Primer extension studies reveal that both the PrfA-dependent and the independent promoter share the same -10 box. The PrfA-independent transcription of inlC depends on a -35 box located directly downstream of the PrfA-box, and the close proximity of the two sites inhibits strongly the transcription activity of the PrfA-independent promoter when the PrfA-RNA polymerase complex binds to the PrfA-box. Deletion of the PrfA-box results in PrfA-independent transcription from PinlC, which is no longer inhibited by PrfA. High concentration of GTP appears to be necessary for PrfA-dependent transcription initiated at the inlC promoter and at other PrfA-dependent promoters. Based on transcriptome analysis, Milohanic and his co-workers identified three groups of genes that were regulated differently by PrfA. Some of these genes containing putative PrfA-boxes in their 5´-upstream regulatory regions were selected for analysis of their transcriptional dependency on PrfA using again the in vitro transcription system. The data show that among these "PrfA-regulated" promoters tested, only the promoter of the hpt gene belonging to group I is clearly activated by PrfA. This promoter is also the only one that exhibited all essential features of a typical PrfA-dependent promoter as described above. In vitro transcription starting at most of the other promoters was neither positively nor negatively affected by PrfA. Transcription initiated at some of the promoters of group III genes (lmo0596 and lmo2067) is rather inefficient with SigA-loaded RNA polymerase, but is highly activated with RNA polymerase loaded with purified SigB. Addition of purified PrfA protein has no effect on the SigB-dependent transcription. These in vitro transcription results indicate that the in vivo observed PrfA effect on the expression of most of the new genes is either indirect or PrfA-mediated transcription of these genes requires - in contrast to the PrfA-dependent transcription of the known virulence genes (including hpt) - additional factors not present in the in vitro transcription assay. In addition to these new genes described by Milohanic, the promoters of two genes (lmo2420 and lmo2840) that contain putative PrfA-boxes with only a single mismatch in their upstream regulatory regions were analyzed in this study. However, transcription of none of these genes is regulated by PrfA, suggesting that these genes are either not truly regulated by PrfA or regulated by other global transcription activators that interact with PrfA by yet unknown mechanisms. By exchanging corresponding sequences between a functionally inactive promoter ParoAP2 and a typical PrfA-dependent promoter PplcA, it is found that PrfA-dependent in vitro transcription can be initiated from the hybrid promoter containing the putative PrfA-box and the SigA-recognized -10 box (TTTAAT) from the putative PrfA-dependent aroAP2 promoter, but it is inhibited strongly by the interspace sequence between these two sites apparently due to an additional RNA polymerase binding site [the -10 box (TAATAT) for the PrfA-independent transcription of ParoAP1)] within this region. Furthermore, a symmetric sequence downstream of the -10 box (TTTAAT) is also shown to be a strongly inhibitory for PrfA-dependent transcription from the putative PrfA-dependent aroAP2 promoter.},
  subject      = {Listeria monocytogenes},
  language  = {en}
}