@inproceedings{EllgringVollmer1992,
  author    = {Ellgring, Johann Heinrich and Vollmer, Heinz C.},
  title     = {Changes of personality and depression during treatment of drug addicts},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-50287},
  year      = {1992},
  abstract  = {In accordance with various other studies. the present longitudinal study gave no clues for specific personality variables or traits 01' drug addicts. Personality factors did not allow a valid prediction of the kind 01' th~apy termination. nor were there clear deviations from the norm. Analyzed as a group. the addicts showed only minor changes that appeared over the course of treatment. These results correspond to data reported on alcohol dependency (cf. Wanke 1987). A more differentiated picture is gained when stable and changeable components of personality and analyzed separately. Changeable components are of special relevance for treatment. From the current study these were characteristics of action regulation, that is, activation and impulse control, social interaction, and somatic reactions (sleep disorders, bodily reactions to drug deprivation). For relapse prevention, attention should be given to stable, persistent, problematic components. Persistent suicidal ideas turned out to be one such aspect. Like the differentiation between state and trait anxiety, stable and variable components could also be separated for other domains of personality when they are used to describe the course of treatment. How can personality concepts and instruments for assessment be utilized for treatment? The claim of therapists to predict the outcome of a treatment may be realized for only a delimited period of time. Especially at such critical points as shortly before relapse, a firm prediction might be possible only rarely (Wanke 1987). Lack of predictability could be a warning which, however, can be verified only afterward. According to the current results, one benefit of personality concepts could be to specify targets of change on an individual basis and thus clarify effects of therapeutic interventions. Personality concepts can help patients to better understand their problems and to recognize changes as weil as persistent areas of vulnerability.},
  subject      = {Psychologie},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{Ellgring1975,
  author    = {Ellgring, Johann Heinrich},
  title     = {Kommunikation und Schlußfolgerung {\"u}ber nichtsprachliches Verhalten},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-50207},
  year      = {1975},
  abstract  = {No abstract available},
  subject      = {Psychologie},
  language  = {de}
}
@inproceedings{Hommers1983,
  author    = {Hommers, Wilfried},
  title     = {Zur quantitativen Theorie von Wiedergutmachungskognitionen unter Gewinnung ihrer Merkmale aus der Jurisprudenz},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-43519},
  year      = {1983},
  abstract  = {Grundz{\"u}ge des rechtswissenschaftlichen Gedankenguts zur Schadenswiedergutmachung werden psychologischen Ans{\"a}tzen dazu gegen{\"u}bergestellt. Das Ergebnis ist die Feststellung, daß die stimulusbezogene Urteilsrelevanz der Schadenswiedergutmachung nicht in der psychologischen Forschung ber{\"u}cksichtigt wurde. Ein diesbez{\"u}glicher Untersuchungsansatz sollte sechs Merkmale besitzen: multifaktoriell, multivariat, Stimulus-Response-vergleichend, quantitativ, ontogenetisch und individual-diagnostisch. Er bildet den Prototyp eines die Moral positiver und negativer Akte umfassenden Ansatzes zur moralischen Urteilsbildung, des ses erste Ergebnisse beschrieben werden.},
  subject      = {Psychologie},
  language  = {de}
}
@inproceedings{HommersSteller1977,
  author    = {Hommers, Wilfried and Steller, Max},
  title     = {Konfigurale Klassifikation von Delinquenten durch Variablen der Therapiemotivation},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-43501},
  year      = {1977},
  abstract  = {No abstract available},
  subject      = {Psychologie},
  language  = {de}
}
@inproceedings{Hommers1983,
  author    = {Hommers, Wilfried},
  title     = {Urteilsbildung : Entwicklung der Informationen-Integration im Urteil},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-43497},
  year      = {1983},
  abstract  = {No abstract available},
  subject      = {Psychologie},
  language  = {de}
}
@inproceedings{Hommers1985,
  author    = {Hommers, Wilfried},
  title     = {Rechtliche Aspekte der Schadenswiedergutmachung als psychologische Problemstellung: Zum Gegenstand der Rechtspsychologie},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-43488},
  year      = {1985},
  abstract  = {An rechtsbezogenen empirischen Arbeiten zur Schadenswiedergutmachung kann die echte Wechselseitigkeit im Verh{\"a}ltnis von Recht und Psychologie im Einklang mit Hommers (1981) weiter belegt werden. Da die Psychologie somit nicht nur Hilfsfunktion f{\"u}r die Rechtspflege, sondern die rechtlichen Gedankeng{\"a}nge auch umgekehrt in gewissen Bereichen Hilfsfunktion f{\"u}r die psychologische Theorienbildung besitzen, wird eine hinreichende Gegenstandsdefinition der Rechtspsychologie erreicht, in der eine eigenst{\"a}ndige Rechtspsychologie i.e.S. gegenpartnerisch neben der Vereinigung der hi7fswissenschaftlichen Kriminal- und Forensischen Psychologie existiert.},
  subject      = {Psychologie},
  language  = {de}
}
@inproceedings{Hommers1991,
  author    = {Hommers, Wilfried},
  title     = {Entschuldigung und Reparaturhilfe f{\"u}r Brandsch{\"a}den durch "Z{\"u}ndeln" im Urteil von Kindern und Erwachsenen},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-43463},
  year      = {1991},
  abstract  = {No abstract available},
  subject      = {Psychologie},
  language  = {de}
}