@article{StengelVuralBrunderetal.2019,
  author    = {Stengel, Helena and Vural, Atay and Brunder, Anna-Michelle and Heinius, Annika and Appeltshauser, Luise and Fiebig, Bianca and Giese, Florian and Dresel, Christian and Papagianni, Aikaterini and Birklein, Frank and Weis, Joachim and Huchtemann, Tessa and Schmidt, Christian and K{\"o}rtvelyessy, Peter and Villmann, Carmen and Meinl, Edgar and Sommer, Claudia and Leypoldt, Frank and Doppler, Kathrin},
  title     = {Anti-pan-neurofascin IgG3 as a marker of fulminant autoimmune neuropathy},
  series = {Neurology: Neuroimmunology \& Neuroinflammation},
  volume    = {6},
  journal   = {Neurology: Neuroimmunology \& Neuroinflammation},
  number    = {5},
  doi       = {10.1212/NXI.0000000000000603},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-202462},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Objective To identify and characterize patients with autoantibodies against different neurofascin (NF) isoforms. Methods Screening of a large cohort of patient sera for anti-NF autoantibodies by ELISA and further characterization by cell-based assays, epitope mapping, and complement binding assays. Results Two different clinical phenotypes became apparent in this study: The well-known clinical picture of subacute-onset severe sensorimotor neuropathy with tremor that is known to be associated with IgG4 autoantibodies against the paranodal isoform NF-155 was found in 2 patients. The second phenotype with a dramatic course of disease with tetraplegia and almost locked-in syndrome was associated with IgG3 autoantibodies against nodal and paranodal isoforms of NF in 3 patients. The epitope against which these autoantibodies were directed in this second phenotype was the common Ig domain found in all 3 NF isoforms. In contrast, anti-NF-155 IgG4 were directed against the NF-155-specific Fn3Fn4 domain. The description of a second phenotype of anti-NF-associated neuropathy is in line with some case reports of similar patients that were published in the last year. Conclusions Our results indicate that anti-pan-NF-associated neuropathy differs from anti-NF-155-associated neuropathy, and epitope and subclass play a major role in the pathogenesis and severity of anti-NF-associated neuropathy and should be determined to correctly classify patients, also in respect to possible differences in therapeutic response.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{AppeltshauserBrunderHeiniusetal.2020,
  author    = {Appeltshauser, Luise and Brunder, Anna-Michelle and Heinius, Annika and K{\"o}rtv{\´e}lyessy, Peter and Wandinger, Klaus-Peter and Junker, Ralf and Villmann, Carmen and Sommer, Claudia and Leypoldt, Frank and Doppler, Kathrin},
  title     = {Antiparanodal antibodies and IgG subclasses in acute autoimmune neuropathy},
  series = {Neurology: Neuroimmunology \& Neuroinflammation},
  volume    = {7},
  journal   = {Neurology: Neuroimmunology \& Neuroinflammation},
  number    = {5},
  doi       = {10.1212/NXI.0000000000000817},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-230079},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Objective To determine whether IgG subclasses of antiparanodal autoantibodies are related to disease course and treatment response in acute- to subacute-onset neuropathies, we retrospectively screened 161 baseline serum/CSF samples and 66 follow-up serum/CSF samples. Methods We used ELISA and immunofluorescence assays to detect antiparanodal IgG and their subclasses and titers in serum/CSF of patients with Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS), recurrent GBS (R-GBS), Miller-Fisher syndrome, and acute- to subacute-onset chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (A-CIDP). We evaluated clinical data retrospectively. Results We detected antiparanodal autoantibodies with a prevalence of 4.3\% (7/161), more often in A-CIDP (4/23, 17.4\%) compared with GBS (3/114, 2.6\%). Longitudinal subclass analysis in the patients with GBS revealed IgG2/3 autoantibodies against Caspr-1 and against anti-contactin-1/Caspr-1, which disappeared at remission. At disease onset, patients with A-CIDP had IgG2/3 anti-Caspr-1 and anti-contactin-1/Caspr-1 or IgG4 anti-contactin-1 antibodies, IgG3 being associated with good response to IV immunoglobulins (IVIg). In the chronic phase of disease, IgG subclass of one patient with A-CIDP switched from IgG3 to IgG4. Conclusion Our data (1) confirm and extend previous observations that antiparanodal IgG2/3 but not IgG4 antibodies can occur in acute-onset neuropathies manifesting as monophasic GBS, (2) suggest association of IgG3 to a favorable response to IVIg, and (3) lend support to the hypothesis that in some patients, an IgG subclass switch from IgG3 to IgG4 may be the correlate of a secondary progressive or relapsing course following a GBS-like onset.},
  language  = {en}
}