@article{BoelchBarthelGoebeletal.2015,
  author    = {Boelch, Sebastian Philipp and Barthel, Thomas and Goebel, Sascha and Rudert, Maximilian and Plumhoff, Piet},
  title     = {Calcinosis universalis - a rare case with classical presentation},
  series = {Case Reports in Orthopedics},
  volume    = {2015},
  journal   = {Case Reports in Orthopedics},
  doi       = {10.1155/2015/505420},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-126300},
  pages     = {505420},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {Juvenile Dermatomyositis (JDM) is a rare autoimmune disease in children and adolescents. In these patients calcinosis might be the most characteristic symptom. However there are only few reported cases of intramuscular calcinosis in Dermatomyositis. We report a case of calcinosis universalis (CU) of the elbow in JDM successfully treated with broaching. The patient, a 24-year-old woman, suffered from a long history of JDM. On examination she presented with a fistula lateral to the olecranon and pain of the right elbow joint. Plain X-rays displayed a diffuse pattern of multiple periarticular, subcutaneous, and intramuscular calcifications. The patient underwent surgery for histological and microbiological sampling as well as broaching. Intraoperatively sinus formation and subfascial hard calcium deposition were found. Due to the risk of collateral tissue damage, incomplete broaching was performed. A local infection with Staphylococcus was diagnosed and treated with antibiotics. On six-week and 30-month follow-up the patient was free of pain and had very good function. Calcifications on standard radiographs had almost resolved entirely. This case report gives a summary on calcinosis in Dermatomyositis and adds a new case of recalcitrant CU to the literature. Broaching surgery proved to be a reliable treatment option in symptomatic calcinosis.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BoelchStreckPlumhoffetal.2020,
  author    = {Boelch, Sebastian Philipp and Streck, Laura Elisa and Plumhoff, Piet and Konrads, Christian and Gohlke, Frank and Rueckl, Kilian},
  title     = {Infection control and outcome of staged reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the management of shoulder infections},
  series = {JSES International},
  volume    = {4},
  journal   = {JSES International},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.jseint.2020.08.012},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-230620},
  pages     = {959-963},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Background The treatment of septic arthritis, caused by either hematogenous seeding, injections, or surgery, can be challenging. Staged reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) with temporary implantation of an antibiotic-loaded spacer is widely accepted but still discussed controversially. This study investigated the shoulder-specific bacterial spectrum, infection control rate, functional outcome, and infection-free survival rate after staged RSA in the mid- to long-term follow-up. It was hypothesized that staged RSA would show a high infection-free survival rate. Methods A total of 39 patients treated with staged RSA for primary septic arthritis (n = 8), secondary infection (n = 8), or periprosthetic infection (n = 23) were retrospectively included. The infection control rate was calculated based on cultures taken intraoperatively at spacer removal and RSA implantation. Infection-free survival was defined as no revision due to infection. The minimum follow-up period for functional outcome assessment was 2 years (n = 14; mean, 76 months; range, 31-128 months). Results Cutibacterium (26\%) and coagulase-negative staphylococci (23\%) were the predominant pathogens. The infection control rate was 90\%. The cumulative infection-free survival rate was 91\% after 128 months. Follow-up examinations showed a mean Constant score of 48 (range, 7-85), a mean QuickDASH (short version of Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire) score of 40.0 (range, 11.4-93.3), and a mean pain score of 1.6 (range, 0-7). Conclusion Staged RSA implantation was confirmed to be a reliable treatment option for primary, secondary, and periprosthetic infections of the shoulder. The infection control rate and infection-free survival rate are satisfactory. However, patients and surgeons must be aware of functional impairment even after successful treatment of infections.},
  language  = {en}
}