@article{BoetzlRiesSchneideretal.2018,
  author    = {Boetzl, Fabian A. and Ries, Elena and Schneider, Gudrun and Krauss, Jochen},
  title     = {It's a matter of design - how pitfall trap design affects trap samples and possible predictions},
  series = {PeerJ},
  volume    = {6},
  journal   = {PeerJ},
  number    = {e5078},
  doi       = {10.7717/peerj.5078},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-176870},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {Background: Pitfall traps are commonly used to assess ground dwelling arthropod communities. The effects of different pitfall trap designs on the trapping outcome are poorly investigated however they might affect conclusions drawn from pitfall trap data greatly. Methods: We tested four pitfall trap types which have been used in previous studies for their effectiveness: a simple type, a faster exchangeable type with an extended plastic rim plate and two types with guidance barriers (V- and X-shaped). About 20 traps were active for 10 weeks and emptied biweekly resulting in 100 trap samples. Results: Pitfall traps with guidance barriers were up to five times more effective than simple pitfall traps and trap samples resulted in more similar assemblage approximations. Pitfall traps with extended plastic rim plates did not only perform poorly but also resulted in distinct carabid assemblages with less individuals of small species and a larger variation. Discussion: Due to the obvious trait filtering and resulting altered assemblages, we suggest not to use pitfall traps with extended plastic rim plates. In comprehensive biodiversity inventories, a smaller number of pitfall traps with guidance barriers and a larger number of spatial replicates is of advantage, while due to comparability reasons, the use of simple pitfall traps will be recommended in most other cases.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BoetzlKonleKrauss2019,
  author    = {Boetzl, Fabian A. and Konle, Antonia and Krauss, Jochen},
  title     = {Aphid cards - useful model for assessing predation rates or bias prone nonsense?},
  series = {Journal of Applied Entomology},
  volume    = {144},
  journal   = {Journal of Applied Entomology},
  number    = {1-2},
  doi       = {10.1111/jen.12692},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-204798},
  pages     = {74-80},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Predation on pest organisms is an essential ecosystem function supporting yields in modern agriculture. However, assessing predation rates is intricate, and they can rarely be linked directly to predator densities or functions. We tested whether sentinel prey aphid cards are useful tools to assess predation rates in the field. Therefore, we looked at aphid cards of different sizes on the ground level as well as within the vegetation. Additionally, by trapping ground-dwelling predators, we examined whether obtained predation rates could be linked to predator densities and traits. Predation rates recorded with aphid cards were independent of aphid card size. However, predation rates on the ground level were three times higher than within the vegetation. We found both predatory carabid activity densities as well as community weighted mean body size to be good predictors for predation rates. Predation rates obtained from aphid cards are stable over card type and related to predator assemblages. Aphid cards, therefore, are a useful, efficient method for rapidly assessing the ecosystem function predation. Their use might especially be recommended for assessments on the ground level and when time and resource limitations rule out more elaborate sentinel prey methods using exclosures with living prey animals.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BoetzlSchueleKraussetal.2020,
  author    = {Boetzl, Fabian A. and Schuele, Maren and Krauss, Jochen and Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf},
  title     = {Pest control potential of adjacent agri-environment schemes varies with crop type and is shaped by landscape context and within-field position},
  series = {Journal of Applied Ecology},
  volume    = {57},
  journal   = {Journal of Applied Ecology},
  number    = {8},
  doi       = {10.1111/1365-2664.13653},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-218265},
  pages     = {1482 -- 1493},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Increasing natural pest control in agricultural fields is an important aim of ecological intensification. Combined effects of landscape context and local placement of agri-environmental schemes (AES) on natural pest control and within-field distance functions of natural pest control agents have rarely been addressed but might affect the distribution of biocontrol providers. Importantly, it is currently unknown whether ecosystem services provided by adjacent AES are consistent for different crop types during crop rotation. In this study, we assessed whether crop rotation from oilseed rape to cereals altered within-field distance functions of ground-dwelling predators from adjacent agri-environmental fields along a gradient in landscape context. Additionally, we recorded crop pests, predation rates, parasitoids as well as crop yields on a total of 30 study sites. Distance functions varied between trophic levels: Carabid richness decreased while densities of carabid beetles, staphylinid beetles as well as crop yields increased towards the field centres. Distance functions of parasitoids and pests were modulated by the amount of semi-natural habitat in the surrounding landscape, while the effects of adjacent AES were limited. Distance decay functions found for ground-dwelling predators in oilseed rape in the previous year were not always present in cereals. Increasing distance to the field edge also increased effects of crop rotation on carabid beetle assemblages, indicating a source habitat function of field edges. Synthesis and applications. Distance functions of natural pest control are not universal and the effects of agri-environmental schemes (AES) in different adjacent crops during crop rotation vary and depend on ecological contrasts. A network of semi-natural habitats and spatially optimized AES habitats can benefit pest control in agricultural landscapes, but constraints as a result of crop type need to be addressed by annually targeted, spatially shifting agri-environment schemes for different crops.},
  language  = {en}
}