@article{BrumbergKuestersAlMomanietal.2017, author = {Brumberg, Joachim and K{\"u}sters, Sebastian and Al-Momani, Ehab and Marotta, Giorgio and Cosgrove, Kelly P. and van Dyck, Christopher H. and Herrmann, Ken and Homola, Gy{\"o}rgy A. and Pezzoli, Gianni and Buck, Andreas K. and Volkmann, Jens and Samnick, Samuel and Isaias, Ioannis U.}, title = {Cholinergic activity and levodopa-induced dyskinesia: a multitracer molecular imaging study}, series = {Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology}, volume = {4}, journal = {Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology}, number = {9}, doi = {10.1002/acn3.438}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-170406}, pages = {632-639}, year = {2017}, abstract = {Objective: To investigate the association between levodopa-induced dyskinesias and striatal cholinergic activity in patients with Parkinson's disease. Methods: This study included 13 Parkinson's disease patients with peak-of-dose levodopa-induced dyskinesias, 12 nondyskinetic patients, and 12 healthy controls. Participants underwent 5-[\(^{123}\)I]iodo-3-[2(S)-2-azetidinylmethoxy]pyridine single-photon emission computed tomography, a marker of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, [\(^{123}\)I]N-ω-fluoropropyl-2β-carbomethoxy-3β-(4-iodophenyl)nortropane single-photon emission computed tomography, to measure dopamine reuptake transporter density and 2-[\(^{18}\)F]fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography to assess regional cerebral metabolic activity. Striatal binding potentials, uptake values at basal ganglia structures, and correlations with clinical variables were analyzed. Results: Density of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in the caudate nucleus of dyskinetic subjects was similar to that of healthy controls and significantly higher to that of nondyskinetic patients, in particular, contralaterally to the clinically most affected side. Interpretation: Our findings support the hypothesis that the expression of dyskinesia may be related to cholinergic neuronal excitability in a dopaminergic-depleted striatum. Cholinergic signaling would play a role in maintaining striatal dopaminergic responsiveness, possibly defining disease phenotype and progression.}, language = {en} } @article{WernerMarcusSheikhbahaeietal.2018, author = {Werner, Rudolf A. and Marcus, Charles and Sheikhbahaei, Sara and Solnes, Lilja B. and Leal, Jeffrey P. and Du, Yong and Rowe, Steven P. and Higuchi, Takahiro and Buck, Andreas K. and Lapa, Constantin and Javadi, Mehrbod S.}, title = {Visual and Semiquantitative Accuracy in Clinical Baseline 123I-Ioflupane SPECT/CT Imaging}, series = {Clinical Nuclear Medicine}, volume = {44}, journal = {Clinical Nuclear Medicine}, number = {1}, issn = {1536-0229}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-168181}, year = {2018}, abstract = {PURPOSE: We aimed to (a) elucidate the concordance of visual assessment of an initial I-ioflupane scan by a human interpreter with comparison to results using a fully automatic semiquantitative method and (b) to assess the accuracy compared to follow-up (f/u) diagnosis established by movement disorder specialists. METHODS: An initial I-ioflupane scan was performed in 382 patients with clinically uncertain Parkinsonian syndrome. An experienced reader performed a visual evaluation of all scans independently. The findings of the visual read were compared with semiquantitative evaluation. In addition, available f/u clinical diagnosis (serving as a reference standard) was compared with results of the human read and the software. RESULTS: When comparing the semiquantitative method with the visual assessment, discordance could be found in 25 (6.5\%) of 382 of the cases for the experienced reader (ĸ = 0.868). The human observer indicated region of interest misalignment as the main reason for discordance. With neurology f/u serving as reference, the results of the reader revealed a slightly higher accuracy rate (87.7\%, ĸ = 0.75) compared to semiquantification (86.2\%, ĸ = 0.719, P < 0.001, respectively). No significant difference in the diagnostic performance of the visual read versus software-based assessment was found. CONCLUSIONS: In comparison with a fully automatic semiquantitative method in I-ioflupane interpretation, human assessment obtained an almost perfect agreement rate. However, compared to clinical established diagnosis serving as a reference, visual read seemed to be slightly more accurate as a solely software-based quantitative assessment.}, subject = {SPECT}, language = {en} }