@article{MihatschBeissertPomperetal.2022,
  author    = {Mihatsch, Patrick W. and Beissert, Matthias and Pomper, Martin G. and Bley, Thorsten A. and Seitz, Anna K. and K{\"u}bler, Hubert and Buck, Andreas K. and Rowe, Steven P. and Serfling, Sebastian E. and Hartrampf, Philipp E. and Werner, Rudolf A.},
  title     = {Changing threshold-based segmentation has no relevant impact on semi-quantification in the context of structured reporting for PSMA-PET/CT},
  series = {Cancers},
  volume    = {14},
  journal   = {Cancers},
  number    = {2},
  issn      = {2072-6694},
  doi       = {10.3390/cancers14020270},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-254782},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-directed positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is increasingly utilized for staging of men with prostate cancer (PC). To increase interpretive certainty, the standardized PSMA reporting and data system (RADS) has been proposed. Using PSMA-RADS, we characterized lesions in 18 patients imaged with \(^{18}\)F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT for primary staging and determined the stability of semi-quantitative parameters. Six hundred twenty-three lesions were categorized according to PSMA-RADS and manually segmented. In this context, PSMA-RADS-3A (soft-tissue) or -3B (bone) lesions are defined as being indeterminate for the presence of PC. For PMSA-RADS-4 and -5 lesions; however, PC is highly likely or almost certainly present [with further distinction based on absence (PSMA-RADS-4) or presence (PSMA-RADS-5) of correlative findings on CT]. Standardized uptake values (SUV\(_{max}\), SUV\(_{peak}\), SUV\(_{mean}\)) were recorded, and volumetric parameters [PSMA-derived tumor volume (PSMA-TV); total lesion PSMA (TL-PSMA)] were determined using different maximum intensity thresholds (MIT) (40 vs. 45 vs. 50\%). SUV\(_{max}\) was significantly higher in PSMA-RADS-5 lesions compared to all other PSMA-RADS categories (p ≤ 0.0322). In particular, the clinically challenging PSMA-RADS-3A lesions showed significantly lower SUV\(_{max}\) and SUV\(_{peak}\) compared to the entire PSMA-RADS-4 or -5 cohort (p < 0.0001), while for PSMA-RADS-3B this only applies when compared to the entire PSMA-RADS-5 cohort (p < 0.0001), but not to the PSMA-RADS-4 cohort (SUV\(_{max}\), p = 0.07; SUV\(_{peak}\), p = 0.08). SUV\(_{mean}\) (p = 0.30) and TL-PSMA (p = 0.16) in PSMA-RADS-5 lesions were not influenced by changing the MIT, while PSMA-TV showed significant differences when comparing 40 vs. 50\% MIT (p = 0.0066), which was driven by lymph nodes (p = 0.0239), but not bone lesions (p = 0.15). SUV\(_{max}\) was significantly higher in PSMA-RADS-5 lesions compared to all other PSMA-RADS categories in \(^{18}\)F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT. As such, the latter parameter may assist the interpreting molecular imaging specialist in assigning the correct PSMA-RADS score to sites of disease, thereby increasing diagnostic certainty. In addition, changes of the MIT in PSMA-RADS-5 lesions had no significant impact on SUV\(_{mean}\) and TL-PSMA in contrast to PSMA-TV.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{WernerHabachaLuetjeetal.2022,
  author    = {Werner, Rudolf A. and Habacha, Bil{\^e}l and L{\"u}tje, Susanne and Bundschuh, Lena and Higuchi, Takahiro and Hartrampf, Philipp and Serfling, Sebastian E. and Derlin, Thorsten and Lapa, Constantin and Buck, Andreas K. and Essler, Markus and Pienta, Kenneth J. and Eisenberger, Mario A. and Markowski, Mark C. and Shinehouse, Laura and AbdAllah, Rehab and Salavati, Ali and Lodge, Martin A. and Pomper, Martin G. and Gorin, Michael A. and Bundschuh, Ralph A. and Rowe, Steven P.},
  title     = {High SUVs Have More Robust Repeatability in Patients with Metastatic Prostate Cancer: Results from a Prospective Test-Retest Cohort Imaged with \(^{18}\)F-DCFPyL},
  series = {Molecular Imaging},
  volume    = {2022},
  journal   = {Molecular Imaging},
  doi       = {10.1155/2022/7056983},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-300748},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {No abstract available.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{HartrampfWeinzierlSerflingetal.2022,
  author    = {Hartrampf, Philipp E. and Weinzierl, Franz-Xaver and Serfling, Sebastian E. and Pomper, Martin G. and Rowe, Steven P. and Higuchi, Takahiro and Seitz, Anna Katharina and K{\"u}bler, Hubert and Buck, Andreas K. and Werner, Rudolf A.},
  title     = {Hematotoxicity and nephrotoxicity in prostate cancer patients undergoing radioligand therapy with [\(^{177}\)Lu]Lu-PSMA I\&T},
  series = {Cancers},
  volume    = {14},
  journal   = {Cancers},
  number    = {3},
  issn      = {2072-6694},
  doi       = {10.3390/cancers14030647},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-254825},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {(1) Background: Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-directed radioligand therapy (RLT) has shown remarkable results in patients with advanced prostate cancer. We aimed to evaluate the toxicity profile of the PSMA ligand [\(^{177}\)Lu]Lu-PSMA I\&T. (2) Methods: 49 patients with metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with at least three cycles of [\(^{177}\)Lu]Lu-PSMA I\&T were evaluated. Prior to and after RLT, we compared leukocytes, hemoglobin, platelet counts, and renal functional parameters (creatinine, eGFR, n = 49; [\(^{99m}\)Tc]-MAG3-derived tubular extraction rate (TER), n = 42). Adverse events were classified according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 and KDIGO Society. To identify predictive factors, we used Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. (3) Results: A substantial fraction of the patients already showed impaired renal function and reduced leukocyte counts at baseline. Under RLT, 11/49 (22\%) patients presented with nephrotoxicity CTCAE I or II according to creatinine, but 33/49 (67\%) according to eGFR. Only 5/42 (13\%) showed reduced TER, defined as <70\% of the age-adjusted mean normal values. Of all renal functional parameters, absolute changes of only 2\% were recorded. CTCAE-based re-categorization was infrequent, with creatinine worsening from I to II in 2/49 (4.1\%; GFR, 1/49 (2\%)). Similar results were recorded for KDIGO (G2 to G3a, 1/49 (2\%); G3a to G3b, 2/49 (4.1\%)). After three cycles, follow-up eGFR correlated negatively with age (r = -0.40, p = 0.005) and the eGFR change with Gleason score (r = -0.35, p < 0.05) at baseline. Leukocytopenia CTCAE II occurred only in 1/49 (2\%) (CTCAE I, 20/49 (41\%)) and CTCAE I thrombocytopenia in 7/49 (14\%), with an absolute decrease of 15.2\% and 16.6\% for leukocyte and platelet counts. Anemia CTCAE II occurred in 10/49 (20\%) (CTCAE I, 36/49 (73\%)) with a decrease in hemoglobin of 4.7\%. (4) Conclusions: After PSMA-targeted therapy using [\(^{177}\)Lu]Lu-PSMA I\&T, no severe (CTCAE III/IV) toxicities occurred, thereby demonstrating that serious adverse renal or hematological events are unlikely to be a frequent phenomenon with this agent.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{WeichHiguchiBundschuhetal.2022,
  author    = {Weich, Alexander and Higuchi, Takahiro and Bundschuh, Ralph A. and Lapa, Constantin and Serfling, Sebastian E. and Rowe, Steven P. and Pomper, Martin G. and Herrmann, Ken and Buck, Andreas K. and Derlin, Thorsten and Werner, Rudolf A.},
  title     = {Training on reporting and data system (RADS) for somatostatin-receptor targeted molecular imaging can reduce the test anxiety of inexperienced readers},
  series = {Molecular Imaging and Biology},
  volume    = {24},
  journal   = {Molecular Imaging and Biology},
  number    = {4},
  doi       = {10.1007/s11307-022-01712-6},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-324645},
  pages     = {631-640},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Purpose For somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT), a standardized framework termed SSTR-reporting and data system (RADS) has been proposed. We aimed to elucidate the impact of a RADS-focused training on reader's anxiety to report on SSTR-PET/CT, the motivational beliefs in learning such a system, whether it increases reader's confidence, and its implementation in clinical routine. Procedures A 3-day training course focusing on SSTR-RADS was conducted. Self-report questionnaires were handed out prior to the course (Pre) and thereafter (Post). The impact of the training on the following categories was evaluated: (1) test anxiety to report on SSTR-PET/CT, (2) motivational beliefs, (3) increase in reader's confidence, and (4) clinical implementation. To assess the effect size of the course, Cohen's d was calculated (small, d = 0.20; large effect, d = 0.80). Results Of 22 participants, Pre and Post were returned by 21/22 (95.5\%). In total, 14/21 (66.7\%) were considered inexperienced (IR, < 1 year experience in reading SSTR-PET/CTs) and 7/21 (33.3\%) as experienced readers (ER, > 1 year). Applying SSTR-RADS, a large decrease in anxiety to report on SSTR-PET/CT was noted for IR (d =  - 0.74, P = 0.02), but not for ER (d = 0.11, P = 0.78). For the other three categories motivational beliefs, reader's confidence, and clinical implementation, agreement rates were already high prior to the training and persisted throughout the course (P ≥ 0.21). Conclusions A framework-focused reader training can reduce anxiety to report on SSTR-PET/CTs, in particular for inexperienced readers. This may allow for a more widespread adoption of this system, e.g., in multicenter trials for better intra- and interindividual comparison of scan results.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{WeichWernerBucketal.2021,
  author    = {Weich, Alexander and Werner, Rudolf A. and Buck, Andreas K. and Hartrampf, Philipp E. and Serfling, Sebastian E. and Scheurlen, Michael and Wester, Hans-J{\"u}rgen and Meining, Alexander and Kircher, Stefan and Higuchi, Takahiro and Pomper, Martin G. and Rowe, Steven P. and Lapa, Constantin and Kircher, Malte},
  title     = {CXCR4-Directed PET/CT in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Neuroendocrine Carcinomas},
  series = {Diagnostics},
  volume    = {11},
  journal   = {Diagnostics},
  number    = {4},
  issn      = {2075-4418},
  doi       = {10.3390/diagnostics11040605},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-234231},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {We aimed to elucidate the diagnostic potential of the C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4)-directed positron emission tomography (PET) tracer \(^{68}\)Ga-Pentixafor in patients with poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC), relative to the established reference standard \(^{18}\)F-FDG PET/computed tomography (CT). In our database, we retrospectively identified 11 treatment-na{\"i}ve patients with histologically proven NEC, who underwent \(^{18}\)F-FDG and CXCR4-directed PET/CT for staging and therapy planning. The images were analyzed on a per-patient and per-lesion basis and compared to immunohistochemical staining (IHC) of CXCR4 from PET-guided biopsies. \(^{68}\)Ga-Pentixafor visualized tumor lesions in 10/11 subjects, while \(^{18}\)F-FDG revealed sites of disease in all 11 patients. Although weak to moderate CXCR4 expression could be corroborated by IHC in 10/11 cases, \(^{18}\)F-FDG PET/CT detected significantly more tumor lesions (102 vs. 42; total lesions, n = 107; p < 0.001). Semi-quantitative analysis revealed markedly higher 18F-FDG uptake as compared to \(^{68}\)Ga-Pentixafor (maximum and mean standardized uptake values (SUV) and tumor-to-background ratios (TBR) of cancerous lesions, SUVmax: 12.8 ± 9.8 vs. 5.2 ± 3.7; SUVmean: 7.4 ± 5.4 vs. 3.1 ± 3.2, p < 0.001; and, TBR 7.2 ± 7.9 vs. 3.4 ± 3.0, p < 0.001). Non-invasive imaging of CXCR4 expression in NEC is inferior to the reference standard \(^{18}\)F-FDG PET/CT.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{EisslerWernerAriasLozaetal.2021,
  author    = {Eissler, Cristoph and Werner, Rudolf A. and Arias-Loza, Paula and Nose, Naoko and Chen, Xinyu and Pomper, Martin G. and Rowe, Steven P. and Lapa, Constantin and Buck, Andreas K. and Higuchi, Takahiro},
  title     = {The number of frames on ECG-gated \(^{18}\)F-FDG small animal PET has a significant impact on LV systolic and diastolic functional parameters},
  series = {Molecular Imaging},
  volume    = {2021},
  journal   = {Molecular Imaging},
  doi       = {10.1155/2021/4629459},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-265778},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Objectives. This study is aimed at investigating the impact of frame numbers in preclinical electrocardiogram- (ECG-) gated \(^{18}\)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (\(^{18}\)F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) on systolic and diastolic left ventricular (LV) parameters in rats. Methods. \(^{18}\)F-FDG PET imaging using a dedicated small animal PET system with list mode data acquisition and continuous ECG recording was performed in diabetic and control rats. The list-mode data was sorted and reconstructed with different numbers of frames (4, 8, 12, and 16) per cardiac cycle into tomographic images. Using an automatic ventricular edge detection software, left ventricular (LV) functional parameters, including ejection fraction (EF), end-diastolic (EDV), and end-systolic volume (ESV), were calculated. Diastolic variables (time to peak filling (TPF), first third mean filling rate (1/3 FR), and peak filling rate (PFR)) were also assessed. Results. Significant differences in multiple parameters were observed among the reconstructions with different frames per cardiac cycle. EDV significantly increased by numbers of frames (353.8 \& PLUSMN; 57.7 mu l*, 380.8 \& PLUSMN; 57.2 mu l*, 398.0 \& PLUSMN; 63.1 mu l*, and 444.8 \& PLUSMN; 75.3 mu l at 4, 8, 12, and 16 frames, respectively; *P < 0.0001 vs. 16 frames), while systolic (EF) and diastolic (TPF, 1/3 FR and PFR) parameters were not significantly different between 12 and 16 frames. In addition, significant differences between diabetic and control animals in 1/3 FR and PFR in 16 frames per cardiac cycle were observed (P < 0.005), but not for 4, 8, and 12 frames. Conclusions. Using ECG-gated PET in rats, measurements of cardiac function are significantly affected by the frames per cardiac cycle. Therefore, if you are going to compare those functional parameters, a consistent number of frames should be used.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{FroehlichSerflingHiguchietal.2021,
  author    = {Fr{\"o}hlich, Matthias and Serfling, Sebastian and Higuchi, Takahiro and Pomper, Martin G. and Rowe, Steven P. and Schmalzing, Marc and Tony, Hans-Peter and Gernert, Michael and Strunz, Patrick-Pascal and Portegys, Jan and Schwaneck, Eva-Christina and Gadeholt, Ottar and Weich, Alexander and Buck, Andreas K. and Bley, Thorsten A. and Guggenberger, Konstanze V. and Werner, Rudolf A.},
  title     = {Whole-Body [\(^{18}\)F]FDG PET/CT Can Alter Diagnosis in Patients with Suspected Rheumatic Disease},
  series = {Diagnostics},
  volume    = {11},
  journal   = {Diagnostics},
  number    = {11},
  issn      = {2075-4418},
  doi       = {10.3390/diagnostics11112073},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-250227},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {The 2-deoxy-d-[\(^{18}\)F]fluoro-D-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is widely utilized to assess the vascular and articular inflammatory burden of patients with a suspected diagnosis of rheumatic disease. We aimed to elucidate the impact of [\(^{18}\)F]FDG PET/CT on change in initially suspected diagnosis in patients at the time of the scan. Thirty-four patients, who had undergone [\(^{18}\)F]FDG PET/CT, were enrolled and the initially suspected diagnosis prior to [18F]FDG PET/CT was compared to the final diagnosis. In addition, a semi-quantitative analysis including vessel wall-to-liver (VLR) and joint-to-liver (JLR) ratios was also conducted. Prior to [\(^{18}\)F]FDG PET/CT, 22/34 (64.7\%) of patients did not have an established diagnosis, whereas in 7/34 (20.6\%), polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) was suspected, and in 5/34 (14.7\%), giant cell arteritis (GCA) was suspected by the referring rheumatologists. After [\(^{18}\)F]FDG PET/CT, the diagnosis was GCA in 19/34 (55.9\%), combined GCA and PMR (GCA + PMR) in 9/34 (26.5\%) and PMR in the remaining 6/34 (17.6\%). As such, [\(^{18}\)F]FDG PET/CT altered suspected diagnosis in 28/34 (82.4\%), including in all unclear cases. VLR of patients whose final diagnosis was GCA tended to be significantly higher when compared to VLR in PMR (GCA, 1.01 ± 0.08 (95\%CI, 0.95-1.1) vs. PMR, 0.92 ± 0.1 (95\%CI, 0.85-0.99), p = 0.07), but not when compared to PMR + GCA (1.04 ± 0.14 (95\%CI, 0.95-1.13), p = 1). JLR of individuals finally diagnosed with PMR (0.94 ± 0.16, (95\%CI, 0.83-1.06)), however, was significantly increased relative to JLR in GCA (0.58 ± 0.04 (95\%CI, 0.55-0.61)) and GCA + PMR (0.64 ± 0.09 (95\%CI, 0.57-0.71); p < 0.0001, respectively). In individuals with a suspected diagnosis of rheumatic disease, an inflammatory-directed [\(^{18}\)F]FDG PET/CT can alter diagnosis in the majority of the cases, particularly in subjects who were referred because of diagnostic uncertainty. Semi-quantitative assessment may be helpful in establishing a final diagnosis of PMR, supporting the notion that a quantitative whole-body read-out may be useful in unclear cases.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{WernerDerlinLapaetal.2020,
  author    = {Werner, Rudolf A. and Derlin, Thorsten and Lapa, Constantin and Sheikbahaei, Sara and Higuchi, Takahiro and Giesel, Frederik L. and Behr, Spencer and Drzezga, Alexander and Kimura, Hiroyuki and Buck, Andreas K. and Bengel, Frank M. and Pomper, Martin G. and Gorin, Michael A. and Rowe, Steven P.},
  title     = {\(^{18}\)F-labeled, PSMA-targeted radiotracers: leveraging the advantages of radiofluorination for prostate cancer molecular imaging},
  series = {Theranostics},
  volume    = {10},
  journal   = {Theranostics},
  number    = {1},
  issn      = {1838-7640},
  doi       = {10.7150/thno.37894},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-202559},
  pages     = {1-16},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted PET imaging for prostate cancer with \(^{68}\)Ga-labeled compounds has rapidly become adopted as part of routine clinical care in many parts of the world. However, recent years have witnessed the start of a shift from \(^{68}\)Ga- to \(^{18}\)F-labeled PSMA-targeted compounds. The latter imaging agents have several key advantages, which may lay the groundwork for an even more widespread adoption into the clinic. First, facilitated delivery from distant suppliers expands the availability of PET radiopharmaceuticals in smaller hospitals operating a PET center but lacking the patient volume to justify an onsite \(^{68}\)Ge/\(^{68}\)Ga generator. Thus, such an approach meets the increasing demand for PSMA-targeted PET imaging in areas with lower population density and may even lead to cost-savings compared to in-house production. Moreover, \(^{18}\)F-labeled radiotracers have a higher positron yield and lower positron energy, which in turn decreases image noise, improves contrast resolution, and maximizes the likelihood of detecting subtle lesions. In addition, the longer half-life of 110 min allows for improved delayed imaging protocols and flexibility in study design, which may further increase diagnostic accuracy. Moreover, such compounds can be distributed to sites which are not allowed to produce radiotracers on-site due to regulatory issues or to centers without access to a cyclotron. In light of these advantageous characteristics, \(^{18}\)F-labeled PSMA-targeted PET radiotracers may play an important role in both optimizing this transformative imaging modality and making it widely available. We have aimed to provide a concise overview of emerging \(^{18}\)F-labeled PSMA-targeted radiotracers undergoing active clinical development. Given the wide array of available radiotracers, comparative studies are needed to firmly establish the role of the available \(^{18}\)F-labeled compounds in the field of molecular PCa imaging, preferably in different clinical scenarios.},
  language  = {en}
}
@unpublished{WernerBundschuhBundschuhetal.2019,
  author    = {Werner, Rudolf A. and Bundschuh, Ralph A. and Bundschuh, Lena and Fanti, Stefano and Javadi, Mehrbod S. and Higuchi, Takahiro and Weich, A. and Pienta, Kenneth J. and Buck, Andreas K. and Pomper, Martin G. and Gorin, Michael A. and Herrmann, Ken and Lapa, Constantin and Rowe, Steven P.},
  title     = {Novel Structured Reporting Systems for Theranostic Radiotracers},
  series = {Journal of Nuclear Medicine},
  journal   = {Journal of Nuclear Medicine},
  issn      = {0161-5505},
  doi       = {10.2967/jnumed.118.223537},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-174629},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Standardized reporting is more and more routinely implemented in clinical practice and such structured reports have a major impact on a large variety of medical fields, e.g. laboratory medicine, pathology, and, recently, radiology. Notably, the field of nuclear medicine is constantly evolving, as novel radiotracers for numerous clinical applications are developed. Thus, framework systems for standardized reporting in this field may a) increase clinical acceptance of new radiotracers, b) allow for inter- and intra-center comparisons for quality assurance, and c) may be used in (global) multi-center studies to ensure comparable results and enable efficient data abstraction. In the last two years, several standardized framework systems for positron emission tomography (PET) radiotracers with potential theranostic applications have been proposed. These include systems for prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted PET agents for the diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer (PCa) and somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-targeted PET agents for the diagnosis and treatment of neuroendocrine neoplasias. In the present review, those standardized framework systems for PSMA- and SSTR-targeted PET will be briefly introduced followed by an overview of their advantages and limitations. In addition, potential applications will be defined, approaches to validate such concepts will be proposed, and future perspectives will be discussed.},
  subject      = {Positronen-Emissions-Tomografie},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{WernerKircherHiguchietal.2019,
  author    = {Werner, Rudolf A. and Kircher, Stefan and Higuchi, Takahiro and Kircher, Malte and Schirbel, Andreas and Wester, Hans-J{\"u}rgen and Buck, Andreas K. and Pomper, Martin G. and Rowe, Steven P. and Lapa, Constantin},
  title     = {CXCR4-directed imaging in solid tumors},
  series = {Frontiers in Oncology},
  volume    = {9},
  journal   = {Frontiers in Oncology},
  number    = {770},
  issn      = {2234-943X},
  doi       = {10.3389/fonc.2019.00770},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-195678},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Despite histological evidence in various solid tumor entities, available experience with CXCR4-directed diagnostics and endoradiotherapy mainly focuses on hematologic diseases. With the goal of expanding the application of CXCR4 theranostics to solid tumors, we aimed to elucidate the feasibility of CXCR4-targeted imaging in a variety of such neoplasms. Methods: Nineteen patients with newly diagnosed, treatment-na{\"i}ve solid tumors including pancreatic adenocarcinoma or neuroendocrine tumor, cholangiocarcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, renal cell carcinoma, ovarian cancer, and prostate cancer underwent [\(^{68}\)Ga]Pentixafor PET/CT. CXCR4-mediated uptake was assessed both visually and semi-quantitatively by evaluation of maximum standardized uptake values (SUV\(_{max}\)) of both primary tumors and metastases. With physiologic liver uptake as reference, tumor-to-background ratios (TBR) were calculated. [\(^{68}\)Ga]Pentixafor findings were further compared to immunohistochemistry and [\(^{18}\)F]FDG PET/CT. Results: On [\(^{68}\)Ga]Pentixafor PET/CT, 10/19 (52.6\%) primary tumors were visually detectable with a median SUVmax of 5.4 (range, 1.7-16.0) and a median TBR of 2.6 (range, 0.8-7.4), respectively. The highest level of radiotracer uptake was identified in a patient with cholangiocarcinoma (SUVmax, 16.0; TBR, 7.4). The relatively low uptake on [\(^{68}\)Ga]Pentixafor was also noted in metastases, exhibiting a median SUVmax of 4.5 (range, 2.3-8.8; TBR, 1.7; range, 1.0-4.1). A good correlation between uptake on [\(^{68}\)Ga]Pentixafor and histological derived CXCR4 expression was noted (R = 0.62, P < 0.05). In the 3 patients in whom [\(^{18}\)F]FDG PET/CT was available, [\(^{68}\)Ga]Pentixafor exhibited lower uptake in all lesions. Conclusions: In this cohort of newly diagnosed, treatment-na{\"i}ve patients with solid malignancies, CXCR4 expression as detected by [\(^{68}\)Ga]Pentixafor-PET/CT and immunohistochemistry was rather moderate. Thus, CXCR4-directed imaging may not play a major role in the management of solid tumors in the majority of patients.},
  language  = {en}
}