@article{MoussetBuchheidtHeinzetal.2014,
  author    = {Mousset, Sabine and Buchheidt, Dieter and Heinz, Werner and Ruhnke, Markus and Cornely, Oliver A. and Egerer, Gerlinde and Kr{\"u}ger, William and Link, Hartmut and Neumann, Silke and Ostermann, Helmut and Panse, Jens and Penack, Olaf and Rieger, Christina and Schmidt-Hieber, Martin and Silling, Gerda and S{\"u}dhoff, Thomas and Ullmann, Andrew J. and Wolf, Hans-Heinrich and Maschmeyer, Georg and B{\"o}hme, Angelika},
  title     = {Treatment of invasive fungal infections in cancer patients—updated recommendations of the Infectious Diseases Working Party (AGIHO) of the German Society of Hematology and Oncology (DGHO)},
  series = {Annals of Hematology},
  volume    = {96},
  journal   = {Annals of Hematology},
  doi       = {10.1007/s00277-013-1867-1},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-121340},
  pages     = {13-32},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {Invasive fungal infections are a main cause of morbidity and mortality in cancer patients undergoing intensive chemotherapy regimens. Early antifungal treatment is mandatory to improve survival. Today, a number of effective and better-tolerated but more expensive antifungal agents compared to the former gold standard amphotericin B deoxycholate are available. Clinical decision-making must consider results from numerous studies and published guidelines, as well as licensing status and cost pressure. New developments in antifungal prophylaxis improving survival rates result in a continuous need for actualization. The treatment options for invasive Candida infections include fluconazole, voriconazole, and amphotericin B and its lipid formulations, as well as echinocandins. Voriconazole, amphotericin B, amphotericin B lipid formulations, caspofungin, itraconazole, and posaconazole are available for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis. Additional procedures, such as surgical interventions, immunoregulatory therapy, and granulocyte transfusions, have to be considered. The Infectious Diseases Working Party of the German Society of Hematology and Oncology here presents its 2008 recommendations discussing the dos and do-nots, as well as the problems and possible solutions, of evidence criteria selection.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BochSpiessHeinzetal.2019,
  author    = {Boch, Tobias and Spiess, Birgit and Heinz, Werner and Cornely, Oliver A. and Schwerdtfeger, Rainer and Hahn, Joachim and Krause, Stefan W. and Duerken, Matthias and Bertz, Hartmut and Reuter, Stefan and Kiehl, Michael and Claus, Bernd and Deckert, Peter Markus and Hofmann, Wolf-Karsten and Buchheidt, Dieter and Reinwald, Mark},
  title     = {Aspergillus specific nested PCR from the site of infection is superior to testing concurrent blood samples in immunocompromised patients with suspected invasive aspergillosis},
  series = {Mycoses},
  volume    = {62},
  journal   = {Mycoses},
  number    = {11},
  doi       = {10.1111/myc.12983},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-214065},
  pages     = {1035 -- 1042},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Invasive aspergillosis (IA) is a severe complication in immunocompromised patients. Early diagnosis is crucial to decrease its high mortality, yet the diagnostic gold standard (histopathology and culture) is time-consuming and cannot offer early confirmation of IA. Detection of IA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) shows promising potential. Various studies have analysed its diagnostic performance in different clinical settings, especially addressing optimal specimen selection. However, direct comparison of different types of specimens in individual patients though essential, is rarely reported. We systematically assessed the diagnostic performance of an Aspergillus-specific nested PCR by investigating specimens from the site of infection and comparing it with concurrent blood samples in individual patients (pts) with IA. In a retrospective multicenter analysis PCR was performed on clinical specimens (n = 138) of immunocompromised high-risk pts (n = 133) from the site of infection together with concurrent blood samples. 38 pts were classified as proven/probable, 67 as possible and 28 as no IA according to 2008 European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Mycoses Study Group consensus definitions. A considerably superior performance of PCR from the site of infection was observed particularly in pts during antifungal prophylaxis (AFP)/antifungal therapy (AFT). Besides a specificity of 85\%, sensitivity varied markedly in BAL (64\%), CSF (100\%), tissue samples (67\%) as opposed to concurrent blood samples (8\%). Our results further emphasise the need for investigating clinical samples from the site of infection in case of suspected IA to further establish or rule out the diagnosis.},
  language  = {en}
}