@article{LichthardtKerscherDietzetal.2016,
  author    = {Lichthardt, Sven and Kerscher, Alexander and Dietz, Ulrich A. and Jurowich, Christian and Kunzmann, Volker and von Rahden, Burkhard H. A. and Germer, Christoph-Thomas and Wiegering, Armin},
  title     = {Original article: role of adjuvant chemotherapy in a perioperative chemotherapy regimen for gastric cancer},
  series = {BMC Cancer},
  volume    = {16},
  journal   = {BMC Cancer},
  number    = {650},
  doi       = {10.1186/s12885-016-2708-0},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-147743},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Background Multimodal treatment strategies - perioperative chemotherapy (CTx) and radical surgery - are currently accepted as treatment standard for locally advanced gastric cancer. However, the role of adjuvant postoperative CTx (postCTx) in addition to neoadjuvant preoperative CTx (preCTx) in this setting remains controversial. Methods Between 4/2006 and 12/2013, 116 patients with locally advanced gastric cancer were treated with preCTx. 72 patients (62 \%), in whom complete tumor resection (R0, subtotal/total gastrectomy with D2-lymphadenectomy) was achieved, were divided into two groups, one of which receiving adjuvant therapy (n = 52) and one without (n = 20). These groups were analyzed with regard to survival and exclusion criteria for adjuvant therapy. Results Postoperative complications, as well as their severity grade, did not correlate with fewer postCTx cycles administered (p = n.s.). Long-term survival was shorter in patients receiving postCTx in comparison to patients without postCTx, but did not show statistical significance. In per protocol analysis by excluding two patients with perioperative death, a shorter 3-year survival rate was observed in patients receiving postCTx compared to patients without postCTx (3-year survival: 71.2 \% postCTx group vs. 90.0 \% non-postCTx group; p = 0.038). Conclusion These results appear contradicting to the anticipated outcome. While speculative, they question the value of post-CTx. Prospectively randomized studies are needed to elucidate the role of postCTx.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{WiegeringIsbertDietzetal.2014,
  author    = {Wiegering, Armin and Isbert, Christoph and Dietz, Ulrich A. and Kunzmann, Volker and Ackermann, Sabine and Kerscher, Alexander and Maeder, Uwe and Flentje, Michael and Schlegel, Nicolas and Reibetanz, Joachim and Germer, Christoph-Thomas and Klein, Ingo},
  title     = {Multimodal therapy in treatment of rectal cancer is associated with improved survival and reduced local recurrence - a retrospective analysis over two decades},
  doi       = {10.1186/1471-2407-14-816},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-110606},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {Background The management of rectal cancer (RC) has substantially changed over the last decades with the implementation of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, adjuvant therapy and improved surgery such as total mesorectal excision (TME). It remains unclear in which way these approaches overall influenced the rate of local recurrence and overall survival. Methods Clinical, histological and survival data of 658 out of 662 consecutive patients with RC were analyzed for treatment and prognostic factors from a prospectively expanded single-institutional database. Findings were then stratified according to time of diagnosis in patient groups treated between 1993 and 2001 and 2002 and 2010. Results The study population included 658 consecutive patients with rectal cancer between 1993 and 2010. Follow up data was available for 99.6\% of all 662 treated patients. During the time period between 2002 and 2010 significantly more patients underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (17.6\% vs. 60\%) and adjuvant chemotherapy (37.9\% vs. 58.4\%). Also, the rate of reported TME during surgery increased. The rate of local or distant metastasis decreased over time, and tumor related 5-year survival increased significantly with from 60\% to 79\%. Conclusion In our study population, the implementation of treatment changes over the last decade improved the patient's outcome significantly. Improvements were most evident for UICC stage III rectal cancer.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{DietzKudsiGarciaUrenaetal.2021,
  author    = {Dietz, Ulrich A. and Kudsi, O. Yusef and Garcia-Ure{\~n}a, Miguel and Baur, Johannes and Ramser, Michaela and Maksimovic, Sladjana and Keller, Nicola and D{\"o}rfer, J{\"o}rg and Eisner, Lukas and Wiegering, Armin},
  title     = {Robotische Hernienchirurgie III: Robotische Inzisionalhernienversorgung mit „transversus abdominis release" (r-TAR). Videobeitrag und Ergebnisse einer Kohortenstudie},
  series = {Der Chirurg},
  volume    = {92},
  journal   = {Der Chirurg},
  number    = {10},
  doi       = {10.1007/s00104-021-01480-z},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-265172},
  pages     = {936-947},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Das Prinzip der gezielten Trennung bzw. Schw{\"a}chung einzelner Komponenten der Bauchdecke zur Spannungsentlastung der Medianlinie bei großen abdominellen Rekonstruktionen ist seit {\"u}ber 30 Jahren als anteriore Komponentenseparation (aKS) bekannt und ein etabliertes Verfahren. Auf der Suche nach Alternativen mit geringerer Komplikationsrate wurde die posteriore Komponentenseparation (pKS) entwickelt; der „transversus abdominis release" (TAR) ist eine nervenschonende Modifikation der pKS. Mit den ergonomischen Ressourcen der Robotik (z. B. abgewinkelte Instrumente) kann der TAR minimal-invasiv durchgef{\"u}hrt werden (r-TAR): Bruchl{\"u}cken von bis zu 14 cm lassen sich verschließen und ein großes extraperitoneales Netz implantieren. In diesem Videobeitrag wird die Versorgung großer Inzisionalhernien in der r‑TAR-Technik pr{\"a}sentiert. Exemplarisch werden die Ergebnisse einer Kohortenstudie an 13 konsekutiven Patienten vorgestellt. Der Eingriff ist anspruchsvoll, die eigenen Ergebnisse sind - wie auch die Berichte aus der Literatur - ermutigend. Der r‑TAR entwickelt sich zur K{\"o}nigsdisziplin der Bauchdeckenrekonstruktion.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{BaurRamserKelleretal.2021,
  author    = {Baur, Johannes and Ramser, Michaela and Keller, Nicola and Muysoms, Filip and D{\"o}rfer, J{\"o}rg and Wiegering, Armin and Eisner, Lukas and Dietz, Ulrich A.},
  title     = {Robotische Hernienchirurgie II: Robotische prim{\"a}r ventrale und inzisionale Hernienversorgung (rv-TAPP und r-Rives/r-TARUP). Videobeitrag und Ergebnisse einer Kohortenstudie an 118 Patienten},
  series = {Der Chirurg},
  volume    = {92},
  journal   = {Der Chirurg},
  number    = {9},
  doi       = {10.1007/s00104-021-01450-5},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-264912},
  pages     = {809-821},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Die endoskopische Versorgung von Umbilikal- und Inzisionalhernien hat sich in den vergangenen 30 Jahren an die Limitationen der konventionellen laparoskopischen Instrumente angepasst. Dazu geh{\"o}rt die Entwicklung von Netzen f{\"u}r die intraperitoneale Lage (intraperitoneales Onlay-Mesh, IPOM) mit antiadh{\"a}siven Beschichtungen; allerdings kommt es bei einem betr{\"a}chtlichen Teil dieser Patienten doch zu Adh{\"a}sionen. Minimal-invasive Verfahren f{\"u}hren zu weniger perioperativen Komplikationen, bei einer etwas h{\"o}heren Rezidivrate. Mit den ergonomischen Ressourcen der Robotik, die abgewinkelte Instrumente anbietet, besteht erstmals die M{\"o}glichkeit, Netze minimal-invasiv in unterschiedliche Bauchdeckenschichten zu implantieren und gleichzeitig eine morphologische und funktionelle Rekonstruktion der Bauchdecke zu erreichen. In diesem Videobeitrag wird die Versorgung von Ventral- und Inzisionalhernien mit Netzimplantation in den pr{\"a}peritonealen Raum (robotische ventrale transabdominelle pr{\"a}peritoneale Patchplastik, rv-TAPP) sowie in den retrorektalen Raum (r-Rives bzw. robotische transabdominelle retromuskul{\"a}re umbilikale Patchplastik [r-TARUP]) pr{\"a}sentiert. Es werden die Ergebnisse einer Kohortenstudie an 118 konsekutiven Patienten vorgestellt und im Hinblick auf den Mehrwert der robotischen Technik in der Extraperitonealisierung der Netze und in der Weiterbildung diskutiert.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{RamserBaurKelleretal.2021,
  author    = {Ramser, Michaela and Baur, Johannes and Keller, Nicola and Kukleta, Jan F. and D{\"o}rfer, J{\"o}rg and Wiegering, Armin and Eisner, Lukas and Dietz, Ulrich A.},
  title     = {Robotische Hernienchirurgie I: Robotische Leistenhernienversorgung (r‑TAPP). Videobeitrag und Ergebnisse einer Kohortenstudie an 302 operierten Hernien},
  series = {Der Chirurg},
  volume    = {92},
  journal   = {Der Chirurg},
  number    = {8},
  doi       = {10.1007/s00104-021-01425-6},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-264883},
  pages     = {707-720},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Die Versorgung von Leistenhernien mit offenen und minimal-invasiven Verfahren hat in den vergangenen 30 Jahren einen vom Ergebnis her gesehen hohen Standard erreicht. Allerdings besteht noch Bedarf an einer weiteren Reduktion der postoperativen Serome, chronischen Schmerzen und des Rezidivs. In diesem Videobeitrag wird die endoskopische Anatomie der Leiste im Hinblick auf die robotische transabdominelle pr{\"a}peritoneale Patchplastik (r‑TAPP) dargestellt und die Operationsschritte der r‑TAPP als Video illustriert. Es werden die Ergebnisse einer Kohortenstudie an 302 konsekutiven Hernien, die mittels r‑TAPP operiert wurden, vorgestellt und hinsichtlich des Mehrwerts der robotischen Technik - auch in der Weiterbildung - diskutiert. Die r‑TAPP ist die nat{\"u}rliche Weiterentwicklung der konventionellen TAPP und hat das Potenzial, bei zunehmender Ger{\"a}teverf{\"u}gbarkeit und Reduktion der Materialkosten zu einem neuen Standard zu werden. K{\"u}nftige Studien werden den vielseitigen Mehrwert der r‑TAPP auch mit neuen Parametern verfeinern m{\"u}ssen.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{DewulfDietzMontgomeryetal.2022,
  author    = {Dewulf, Maxime and Dietz, Ulrich A. and Montgomery, Agneta and Pauli, Eric M. and Marturano, Matthew N. and Ayuso, Sullivan A. and Augenstein, Vedra A. and Lambrecht, Jan R. and K{\"o}hler, Gernot and Keller, Nicola and Wiegering, Armin and Muysoms, Filip},
  title     = {Robotische Hernienchirurgie Teil IV : Roboterassistierte endoskopische parastomale Hernienversorgung. Videobericht und Ergebnisse},
  series = {Chirurgie},
  volume    = {93},
  journal   = {Chirurgie},
  number    = {11},
  doi       = {10.1007/s00104-022-01715-7},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-323882},
  pages     = {1051-1062},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Die chirurgische Behandlung parastomaler Hernien gilt als komplex und ist bekanntermaßen komplikationstr{\"a}chtig. In der Vergangenheit wurden diese Hernien durch die Relokation des Stomas oder Nahtverfahren der Austrittstelle versorgt. In den letzten Jahren wurden verschiedene netzbasierte Techniken vorgeschlagen, die heute in der minimal-invasiven Chirurgie eingesetzt werden. Mit der Verbreitung der roboterassistierten Hernienchirurgie wurden die Netzverfahren weiterentwickelt und die Ergebnisse f{\"u}r die Patienten erheblich verbessert. In diesem Beitrag wird ein {\"U}berblick {\"u}ber die verf{\"u}gbaren Techniken der roboterassistierten Versorgung parastomaler Hernien pr{\"a}sentiert. Es werden technische {\"U}berlegungen und erste Ergebnisse des roboterassistierten modifizierten Sugarbaker-Verfahrens, der roboterassistierten Pauli-Technik und der Verwendung des trichterf{\"o}rmigen Netzes IPST vorgestellt. Dar{\"u}ber hinaus werden die Herausforderungen bei der roboterassistierten Versorgung parastomaler Hernien am Ileum-Conduit diskutiert. Die Operationstechniken werden durch Foto- und Videomaterial veranschaulicht.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{BaurRamserKelleretal.2021,
  author    = {Baur, Johannes and Ramser, Michaela and Keller, Nicola and Muysoms, Filip and D{\"o}rfer, J{\"o}rg and Wiegering, Armin and Eisner, Lukas and Dietz, Ulrich A.},
  title     = {Robotic hernia repair II. English version},
  series = {Der Chirurg},
  volume    = {92},
  journal   = {Der Chirurg},
  number    = {Suppl 1},
  doi       = {10.1007/s00104-021-01479-6},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-323866},
  pages     = {S15-S26},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Endoscopic management of umbilical and incisional hernias has adapted to the limitations of conventional laparoscopic instruments over the past 30 years. This includes the development of meshes for intraperitoneal placement (intraperitoneal onlay mesh, IPOM), with antiadhesive coatings; however, adhesions do occur in a significant proportion of these patients. Minimally invasive procedures result in fewer perioperative complications, but with a slightly higher recurrence rate. With the ergonomic resources of robotics, which offers angled instruments, it is now possible to implant meshes in a minimally invasively manner in different abdominal wall layers while achieving morphologic and functional reconstruction of the abdominal wall. This video article presents the treatment of ventral and incisional hernias with mesh implantation into the preperitoneal space (robot-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal ventral hernia repair, r‑ventral TAPP) as well as into the retrorectus space (r-Rives and robotic transabdominal retromuscular umbilical prosthetic repair, r‑TARUP, respectively). The results of a cohort study of 118 consecutive patients are presented and discussed with regard to the added value of the robotic technique in extraperitoneal mesh implantation and in the training of residents.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{RamserBaurKelleretal.2021,
  author    = {Ramser, Michaela and Baur, Johannes and Keller, Nicola and Kukleta, Jan F. and D{\"o}rfer, J{\"o}rg and Wiegering, Armin and Eisner, Lukas and Dietz, Ulrich A.},
  title     = {Robotic hernia surgery I. English version},
  series = {Der Chirurg},
  volume    = {92},
  journal   = {Der Chirurg},
  number    = {Suppl 1},
  doi       = {10.1007/s00104-021-01446-1},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-323934},
  pages     = {S1-S13},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {The treatment of inguinal hernias with open and minimally invasive procedures has reached a high standard in terms of outcome over the past 30 years. However, there is still need for further improvement, mainly in terms of reduction of postoperative seroma, chronic pain, and recurrence. This video article presents the endoscopic anatomy of the groin with regard to robotic transabdominal preperitoneal patch plasty (r‑TAPP) and illustrates the surgical steps of r‑TAPP with respective video sequences. The results of a cohort study of 302 consecutive hernias operated by r‑TAPP are presented and discussed in light of the added value of the robotic technique, including advantages for surgical training. r‑TAPP is the natural evolution of conventional TAPP and has the potential to become a new standard as equipment availability increases and material costs decrease. Future studies will also have to refine the multifaceted added value of r‑TAPP with new parameters.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{DewulfDietzMontgomeryetal.2022,
  author    = {Dewulf, Maxime and Dietz, Ulrich A. and Montgomery, Agneta and Pauli, Eric M. and Marturano, Matthew N. and Ayuso, Sullivan A. and Augenstein, Vedra A. and Lambrecht, Jan R. and K{\"o}hler, Gernot and Keller, Nicola and Wiegering, Armin and Muysoms, Filip},
  title     = {Robotic hernia surgery IV. English version},
  series = {Chirurgie},
  volume    = {93},
  journal   = {Chirurgie},
  number    = {Suppl 2},
  doi       = {10.1007/s00104-022-01779-5},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-323875},
  pages     = {S129-S140},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {The surgical treatment of parastomal hernias is considered complex and is known to be prone to complications. Traditionally, this condition was treated using relocation techniques or local suture repairs. Since then, several mesh-based techniques have been proposed and are nowadays used in minimally invasive surgery. Since the introduction of robot-assisted surgery to the field of abdominal wall surgery, several adaptations to these techniques have been made, which may significantly improve patient outcomes. In this contribution, we provide an overview of available techniques in robot-assisted parastomal hernia repair. Technical considerations and preliminary results of robot-assisted modified Sugarbaker repair, robot-assisted Pauli technique, and minimally invasive use of a funnel-shaped mesh in the treatment of parastomal hernias are presented. Furthermore, challenges in robot-assisted ileal conduit parastomal hernia repair are discussed. These techniques are illustrated by photographic and video material. Besides providing a comprehensive overview of robot-assisted parastomal hernia repair, this article focuses on the specific advantages of robot-assisted techniques in the treatment of this condition.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{DietzKudsiGarciaUrenaetal.2021,
  author    = {Dietz, Ulrich A. and Kudsi, O. Yusef and Garcia-Ure{\~n}a, Miguel and Baur, Johannes and Ramser, Michaela and Maksimovic, Sladjana and Keller, Nicola and D{\"o}rfer, J{\"o}rg and Eisner, Lukas and Wiegering, Armin},
  title     = {Robotic hernia repair III. English version},
  series = {Der Chirurg},
  volume    = {92},
  journal   = {Der Chirurg},
  number    = {Suppl 1},
  doi       = {10.1007/s00104-021-01500-y},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-323896},
  pages     = {S28-S39},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {The principle of targeted separation or weakening of individual components of the abdominal wall to relieve tension in the median line during major abdominal reconstruction has been known for over 30 years as anterior component separation (aCS) and is an established procedure. In search of alternatives with lower complication rates, posterior component separation (pCS) was developed; transversus abdominis release (TAR) is a nerve-sparing modification of pCS. With the ergonomic resources of robotics (e.g., angled instruments), TAR can be performed in a minimally invasive manner (r-TAR): hernia gaps of up to 14 cm can be closed and a large extraperitoneal mesh implanted. In this video article, the treatment of large incisional hernias using the r‑TAR technique is presented. Exemplary results of a cohort study in 13 consecutive patients are presented. The procedure is challenging, but our own results—as well as reports from the literature—are encouraging. The r‑TAR is becoming the pinnacle procedure for abdominal wall reconstruction.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{DietzKudsiGarciaUrenaetal.2021,
  author    = {Dietz, Ulrich A. and Kudsi, O. Yusef and Garcia-Ure{\~n}a, Miguel and Baur, Johannes and Ramser, Michaela and Maksimovic, Sladjana and Keller, Nicola and D{\"o}rfer, J{\"o}rg and Eisner, Lukas and Wiegering, Armin},
  title     = {Erratum to: Robotic hernia repair III. English version},
  series = {Der Chirurg},
  volume    = {92},
  journal   = {Der Chirurg},
  number    = {Suppl 1},
  doi       = {10.1007/s00104-021-01564-w},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-329360},
  pages     = {40},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {No abstract available.},
  language  = {en}
}