@article{HendricksMuellerFassnachtetal.2022,
  author    = {Hendricks, Anne and M{\"u}ller, Sophie and Fassnacht, Martin and Germer, Christoph-Thomas and Wiegering, Verena A. and Wiegering, Armin and Reibetanz, Joachim},
  title     = {Impact of lymphadenectomy on the oncologic outcome of patients with adrenocortical carcinoma — a systematic review and meta-analysis},
  series = {Cancers},
  volume    = {14},
  journal   = {Cancers},
  number    = {2},
  issn      = {2072-6694},
  doi       = {10.3390/cancers14020291},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-254798},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {(1) Background: Locoregional lymphadenectomy (LND) in adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) may impact oncological outcome, but the findings from individual studies are conflicting. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the oncological value of LND in ACC by summarizing the available literature. (2) Methods: A systematic search on studies published until December 2020 was performed according to the PRISMA statement. The primary outcome was the impact of lymphadenectomy on overall survival (OS). Two separate meta-analyses were performed for studies including patients with localized ACC (stage I-III) and those including all tumor stages (I-IV). Secondary endpoints included postoperative mortality and length of hospital stay (LOS). (3) Results: 11 publications were identified for inclusion. All studies were retrospective studies, published between 2001-2020, and 5 were included in the meta-analysis. Three studies (N = 807 patients) reported the impact of LND on disease-specific survival in patients with stage I-III ACC and revealed a survival benefit of LND (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.42, 95\% confidence interval (95\% CI): 0.26-0.68). Based on results of studies including patients with ACC stage I-IV (2 studies, N = 3934 patients), LND was not associated with a survival benefit (HR = 1.00, 95\% CI: 0.70-1.42). None of the included studies showed an association between LND and postoperative mortality or LOS. (4) Conclusion: Locoregional lymphadenectomy seems to offer an oncologic benefit in patients undergoing curative-intended surgery for localized ACC (stage I-III).},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{LenschowWennmannHendricksetal.2022,
  author    = {Lenschow, Christina and Wennmann, Andreas and Hendricks, Anne and Germer, Christoph-Thomas and Fassnacht, Martin and Buck, Andreas and Werner, Rudolf A. and Plassmeier, Lars and Schlegel, Nicolas},
  title     = {Questionable value of [\(^{99m}\)Tc]-sestamibi scintigraphy in patients with pHPT and negative ultrasound},
  series = {Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery},
  volume    = {407},
  journal   = {Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery},
  number    = {8},
  doi       = {10.1007/s00423-022-02648-9},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-323926},
  pages     = {3661-3669},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Purpose A successful focused surgical approach in primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT) relies on accurate preoperative localization of the parathyroid adenoma (PA). Most often, ultrasound is followed by [\(^{99m}\)Tc]-sestamibi scintigraphy, but the value of this approach is disputed. Here, we evaluated the diagnostic approach in patients with surgically treated pHPT in our center with the aim to further refine preoperative diagnostic procedures. Methods A single-center retrospective analysis of patients with pHPT from 01/2005 to 08/2021 was carried out followed by evaluation of the preoperative imaging modalities to localize PA. The localization of the PA had to be confirmed intraoperatively by the fresh frozen section and significant dropping of the intraoperative parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels. Results From 658 patients diagnosed with pHPT, 30 patients were excluded from the analysis because of surgery for recurrent or persistent disease. Median age of patients was 58.0 (13-93) years and 71\% were female. Neck ultrasound was carried out in 91.7\% and localized a PA in 76.6\%. In 23.4\% (135/576) of the patients, preoperative neck ultrasound did not detect a PA. In this group, [\(^{99m}\)Tc]-sestamibi correctly identified PA in only 25.4\% of patients. In contrast, in the same cohort, the use of [\(^{11}\)C]-methionine or [\(^{11}\)C]-choline PET resulted in the correct identification of PA in 79.4\% of patients (OR 13.23; 95\% CI 5.24-33.56). Conclusion [\(^{11}\)C]-Methionine or [\(^{11}\)C]-choline PET/CT are superior second-line imaging methods to select patients for a focused surgical approach when previous ultrasound failed to identify PA.},
  language  = {en}
}