@article{TerposKleberEngelhardtetal.2015, author = {Terpos, Evangelos and Kleber, Martina and Engelhardt, Monika and Zweegman, Sonja and Gay, Francesca and Kastritis, Efstathios and van de Donk, Niels W. C. J. and Bruno, Benedetto and Sezer, Orhan and Broijl, Annemiek and Bringhen, Sara and Beksac, Meral and Larocca, Alessandra and Hajek, Roman and Musto, Pellegrino and Johnsen, Hans Erik and Morabito, Fortunato and Ludwig, Heinz and Cavo, Michele and Einsele, Hermann and Sonneveld, Pieter and Dimopoulos, Meletios A. and Palumbo, Antonio}, title = {European Myeloma Network Guidelines for the Management of Multiple Myeloma-related Complications}, series = {Haematologica}, volume = {100}, journal = {Haematologica}, number = {10}, doi = {10.3324/haematol.2014.117176}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-141913}, pages = {1254 -- 1266}, year = {2015}, abstract = {The European Myeloma Network provides recommendations for the management of the most common complications of multiple myeloma. Whole body low-dose computed tomography is more sensitive than conventional radiography in depicting osteolytic disease and thus we recommend it as the novel standard for the detection of lytic lesions in myeloma (grade 1A). Myeloma patients with adequate renal function and bone disease at diagnosis should be treated with zoledronic acid or pamidronate (grade 1A). Symptomatic patients without lytic lesions on conventional radiography can be treated with zoledronic acid (grade 1B), but its advantage is not clear for patients with no bone involvement on computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. In asymptomatic myeloma, bisphosphonates are not recommended (grade 1A). Zoledronic acid should be given continuously, but it is not clear if patients who achieve at least a very good partial response benefit from its continuous use (grade 1B). Treatment with erythropoietic-stimulating agents may be initiated in patients with persistent symptomatic anemia (hemoglobin < 10g/dL) in whom other causes of anemia have been excluded (grade 1B). Erythropoietic agents should be stopped after 6-8 weeks if no adequate hemoglobin response is achieved. For renal impairment, bortezomib-based regimens are the current standard of care (grade 1A). For the management of treatment-induced peripheral neuropathy, drug modification is needed (grade 1C). Vaccination against influenza is recommended; vaccination against streptococcus pneumonia and hemophilus influenza is appropriate, but efficacy is not guaranteed due to suboptimal immune response (grade 1C). Prophylactic aciclovir (or valacyclovir) is recommended for patients receiving proteasome inhibitors, autologous or allogeneic transplantation (grade 1A).}, language = {en} } @article{vandeDonkPalumboJohnsenetal.2014, author = {van de Donk, Niels W. C. J. and Palumbo, Antonio and Johnsen, Hans Erik and Engelhardt, Monika and Gay, Francesca and Gregersen, Henrik and Hajek, Roman and Kleber, Martina and Ludwig, Heinz and Morgan, Gareth and Musto, Pellegrino and Plesner, Torben and Sezer, Orhan and Terpos, Evangelos and Waage, Anders and Zweegman, Sonja and Einsele, Hermann and Sonneveld, Pieter and Lokhorst, Henk M.}, title = {The clinical relevance and management of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and related disorders: recommendations from the European Myeloma Network}, series = {Haematologica}, volume = {99}, journal = {Haematologica}, number = {6}, issn = {0390-6078}, doi = {10.3324/haematol.2013.100552}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-116050}, pages = {984 - 996}, year = {2014}, abstract = {Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance is one of the most common pre-malignant disorders. IgG and IgA monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance are precursor conditions of multiple myeloma; light-chain monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance of light-chain multiple myeloma; and IgM monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance of Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia and other lymphoproliferative disorders. Clonal burden, as determined by bone marrow plasma cell percentage or M-protein level, as well as biological characteristics, including heavy chain isotype and light chain production, are helpful in predicting risk of progression of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance to symptomatic disease. Furthermore, alterations in the bone marrow microenvironment of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance patients result in an increased risk of venous and arterial thrombosis, infections, osteoporosis, and bone fractures. In addition, the small clone may occasionally be responsible for severe organ damage through the production of a monoclonal protein that has autoantibody activity or deposits in tissues. These disorders are rare and often require therapy directed at eradication of the underlying plasma cell or lymphoplasmacytic clone. In this review, we provide an overview of the clinical relevance of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. We also give general recommendations of how to diagnose and manage patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance.}, language = {en} } @article{EngelhardtTerposKleberetal.2014, author = {Engelhardt, Monika and Terpos, Evangelos and Kleber, Martina and Gay, Francesca and W{\"a}sch, Ralph and Morgan, Gareth and Cavo, Michele and van de Donk, Niels and Beilhack, Andreas and Bruno, Benedetto and Johnsen, Hans Erik and Hajek, Roman and Driessen, Christoph and Ludwig, Heinz and Beksac, Meral and Boccadoro, Mario and Straka, Christian and Brighen, Sara and Gramatzki, Martin and Larocca, Alessandra and Lokhorst, Henk and Magarotto, Valeria and Morabito, Fortunato and Dimopoulos, Meletios A. and Einsele, Hermann and Sonneveld, Pieter and Palumbo, Antonio}, title = {European Myeloma Network recommendations on the evaluation and treatment of newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma}, series = {Haematologica}, volume = {99}, journal = {Haematologica}, number = {2}, doi = {10.3324/haematol.2013.099358}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-117477}, pages = {232-242}, year = {2014}, abstract = {Multiple myeloma management has undergone profound changes in the past thanks to advances in our understanding of the disease biology and improvements in treatment and supportive care approaches. This article presents recommendations of the European Myeloma Network for newly diagnosed patients based on the GRADE system for level of evidence. All patients with symptomatic disease should undergo risk stratification to classify patients for International Staging System stage (level of evidence: 1A) and for cytogenetically defined high-versus standard-risk groups (2B). Novel-agent-based induction and up-front autologous stem cell transplantation in medically fit patients remains the standard of care (1A). Induction therapy should include a triple combination of bortezomib, with either adriamycin or thalidomide and dexamethasone (1A), or with cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone (2B). Currently, allogeneic stem cell transplantation may be considered for young patients with high-risk disease and preferably in the context of a clinical trial (2B). Thalidomide (1B) or lenalidomide (1A) maintenance increases progression-free survival and possibly overall survival (2B). Bortezomib-based regimens are a valuable consolidation option, especially for patients who failed excellent response after autologous stem cell transplantation (2A). Bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone or melphalan-prednisone-thalidomide are the standards of care for transplant-ineligible patients (1A). Melphalan-prednisone-lenalidomide with lenalidomide maintenance increases progression-free survival, but overall survival data are needed. New data from the phase III study (MM-020/IFM 07-01) of lenalidomide-low-dose dexamethasone reached its primary end point of a statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival as compared to melphalan-prednisone-thalidomide and provides further evidence for the efficacy of lenalidomide-low-dose dexamethasone in transplant-ineligible patients (2B).}, language = {en} } @article{LudwigDelforgeFaconetal.2018, author = {Ludwig, Heinz and Delforge, Michel and Facon, Thierry and Einsele, Hermann and Gay, Francesca and Moreau, Philippe and Avet-Loiseau, Herv{\´e} and Boccadoro, Mario and Hajek, Roman and Mohty, Mohamad and Cavo, Michele and Dimopoulos, Meletios A and San-Miguel, Jes{\´u}s F and Terpos, Evangelos and Zweegman, Sonja and Garderet, Laurent and Mateos, Mar{\´i}a-Victoria and Cook, Gordon and Leleu, Xavier and Goldschmidt, Hartmut and Jackson, Graham and Kaiser, Martin and Weisel, Katja and van de Donk, Niels W. C. J. and Waage, Anders and Beksac, Meral and Mellqvist, Ulf H. and Engelhardt, Monika and Caers, Jo and Driessen, Christoph and Blad{\´e}, Joan and Sonneveld, Pieter}, title = {Prevention and management of adverse events of novel agents in multiple myeloma: a consensus of the European Myeloma Network}, series = {Leukemia}, volume = {32}, journal = {Leukemia}, doi = {10.1038/s41375-018-0040-1}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-237338}, pages = {1542-1560}, year = {2018}, abstract = {During the last few years, several new drugs have been introduced for treatment of patients with multiple myeloma, which have significantly improved the treatment outcome. All of these novel substances differ at least in part in their mode of action from similar drugs of the same drug class, or are representatives of new drug classes, and as such present with very specific side effect profiles. In this review, we summarize these adverse events, provide information on their prevention, and give practical guidance for monitoring of patients and for management of adverse events.}, language = {en} } @article{MustoEngelhardtCaersetal.2021, author = {Musto, Pellegrino and Engelhardt, Monika and Caers, Jo and Bolli, Niccolo' and Kaiser, Martin and van de Donk, Niels and Terpos, Evangelos and Broijl, Annemiek and de Larrea, Carlos Fern{\´a}ndez and Gay, Francesca and Goldschmidt, Hartmut and Hajek, Roman and Vangsted, Annette Juul and Zamagni, Elena and Zweegman, Sonja and Cavo, Michele and Dimopoulos, Meletios and Einsele, Hermann and Ludwig, Heinz and Barosi, Giovanni and Boccadoro, Mario and Mateos, Maria-Victoria and Sonneveld, Pieter and San Miguel, Jesus}, title = {2021 European Myeloma Network review and consensus statement on smoldering multiple myeloma: how to distinguish (and manage) Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde}, series = {Haematologica}, volume = {106}, journal = {Haematologica}, doi = {10.3324/haematol.2021.278519}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-371372}, pages = {2799-2812}, year = {2021}, abstract = {According to the updated International Myeloma Working Group criteria, smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) is an asymptomatic plasma cell disorder characterized by an M-component >3 g/dL, bone marrow plasma cell infiltration >10\% and <60\%, and absence of any myeloma-defining event. Active multiple myeloma is preceded by SMM, with a median time to progression of approximately 5 years. Cases of SMM range from the extremes of "monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance-like", in which patients never progress during their lifetimes, to "early multiple myeloma", in which transformation into symptomatic disease, based on genomic evolution, may be rapid and devastating. Such a "split personality" makes the prognosis and management of individual patients challenging, particularly with regard to the identification and possible early treatment of high-risk SMM. Outside of clinical trials, the conventional approach to SMM generally remains close observation until progression to active multiple myeloma. However, two prospective, randomized trials have recently demonstrated a significant clinical benefit in terms of time to progression, and of overall survival in one of the two studies, for some patients with higher-risk SMM treated with lenalidomide ± dexamethasone, raising the question of whether such an approach should be considered a new standard of care. In this paper, experts from the European Myeloma Network describe current biological and clinical knowledge on SMM, focusing on novel insights into its molecular pathogenesis, new prognostic scoring systems proposed to identify SMM patients at higher risk of early transformation, and updated results of completed or ongoing clinical trials. Finally, some practical recommendations for the real-life management of these patients, based on Delphi consensus methodology, are provided.}, language = {en} }