@article{HeiligSandnerJordanetal.2021,
  author    = {Heilig, Philipp and Sandner, Phoebe and Jordan, Martin Cornelius and Jakubietz, Rafael Gregor and Meffert, Rainer Heribert and Gbureck, Uwe and Hoelscher-Doht, Stefanie},
  title     = {Experimental drillable magnesium phosphate cement is a promising alternative to conventional bone cements},
  series = {Materials},
  volume    = {14},
  journal   = {Materials},
  number    = {8},
  issn      = {1996-1944},
  doi       = {10.3390/ma14081925},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-236633},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Clinically used mineral bone cements lack high strength values, absorbability and drillability. Therefore, magnesium phosphate cements have recently received increasing attention as they unify a high mechanical performance with presumed degradation in vivo. To obtain a drillable cement formulation, farringtonite (Mg\(_3\)(PO\(_4\))\(_2\)) and magnesium oxide (MgO) were modified with the setting retardant phytic acid (C\(_6\)H\(_{18}\)O\(_{24}\)P\(_6\)). In a pre-testing series, 13 different compositions of magnesium phosphate cements were analyzed concentrating on the clinical demands for application. Of these 13 composites, two cement formulations with different phytic acid content (22.5 wt\% and 25 wt\%) were identified to meet clinical demands. Both formulations were evaluated in terms of setting time, injectability, compressive strength, screw pullout tests and biomechanical tests in a clinically relevant fracture model. The cements were used as bone filler of a metaphyseal bone defect alone, and in combination with screws drilled through the cement. Both formulations achieved a setting time of 5 min 30 s and an injectability of 100\%. Compressive strength was shown to be ~12-13 MPa and the overall displacement of the reduced fracture was <2 mm with and without screws. Maximum load until reduced fracture failure was ~2600 N for the cements only and ~3800 N for the combination with screws. Two new compositions of magnesium phosphate cements revealed high strength in clinically relevant biomechanical test set-ups and add clinically desired characteristics to its strength such as injectability and drillability.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{FuchsHeiligMcDonoghetal.2020,
  author    = {Fuchs, Konrad F. and Heilig, Philipp and McDonogh, Miriam and Boelch, Sebastian and Gbureck, Uwe and Meffert, Rainer H. and Hoelscher-Doht, Stefanie and Jordan, Martin C.},
  title     = {Cement-augmented screw fixation for calcaneal fracture treatment: a biomechanical study comparing two injectable bone substitutes},
  series = {Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research},
  volume    = {15},
  journal   = {Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research},
  doi       = {10.1186/s13018-020-02009-6},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-230336},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Background The role of cement-augmented screw fixation for calcaneal fracture treatment remains unclear. Therefore, this study was performed to biomechanically analyze screw osteosynthesis by reinforcement with either a calcium phosphate (CP)-based or polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA)-based injectable bone cement. Methods A calcaneal fracture (Sanders type IIA) including a central cancellous bone defect was generated in 27 synthetic bones, and the specimens were assigned to 3 groups. The first group was fixed with four screws (3.5 mm and 6.5 mm), the second group with screws and CP-based cement (Graftys (R) QuickSet; Graftys, Aix-en-Provence, France), and the third group with screws and PMMA-based cement (Traumacem (TM) V+; DePuy Synthes, Warsaw, IN, USA). Biomechanical testing was conducted to analyze peak-to-peak displacement, total displacement, and stiffness in following a standardized protocol. Results The peak-to-peak displacement under a 200-N load was not significantly different among the groups; however, peak-to-peak displacement under a 600- and 1000-N load as well as total displacement exhibited better stability in PMMA-augmented screw osteosynthesis compared to screw fixation without augmentation. The stiffness of the construct was increased by both CP- and PMMA-based cements. Conclusion Addition of an injectable bone cement to screw osteosynthesis is able to increase fixation strength in a biomechanical calcaneal fracture model with synthetic bones. In such cases, PMMA-based cements are more effective than CP-based cements because of their inherently higher compressive strength. However, whether this high strength is required in the clinical setting for early weight-bearing remains controversial, and the non-degradable properties of PMMA might cause difficulties during subsequent interventions in younger patients.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{EwaldFuchsBoegeleinetal.2023,
  author    = {Ewald, Andrea and Fuchs, Andreas and Boegelein, Lasse and Grunz, Jan-Peter and Kneist, Karl and Gbureck, Uwe and Hoelscher-Doht, Stefanie},
  title     = {Degradation and bone-contact biocompatibility of two drillable magnesium phosphate bone cements in an in vivo rabbit bone defect model},
  series = {Materials},
  volume    = {16},
  journal   = {Materials},
  number    = {13},
  issn      = {1996-1944},
  doi       = {10.3390/ma16134650},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-362824},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {The use of bone-cement-enforced osteosynthesis is a growing topic in trauma surgery. In this context, drillability is a desirable feature for cements that can improve fracture stability, which most of the available cement systems lack. Therefore, in this study, we evaluated a resorbable and drillable magnesium-phosphate (MgP)-based cement paste considering degradation behavior and biocompatibility in vivo. Two different magnesium-phosphate-based cement (MPC) pastes with different amounts of phytic acid (IP 6) as setting retarder (MPC 22.5 and MPC 25) were implanted in an orthotopic defect model of the lateral femoral condyle of New Zealand white rabbits for 6 weeks. After explantation, their resorption behavior and material characteristics were evaluated by means of X-ray diffraction (XRD), porosimetry measurement, histological staining, peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT), cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and biomechanical load-to-failure tests. Both cement pastes displayed comparable results in mechanical strength and resorption kinetics. Bone-contact biocompatibility was excellent without any signs of inflammation. Initial resorption and bone remodeling could be observed. MPC pastes with IP 6 as setting retardant have the potential to be a valuable alternative in distinct fracture patterns. Drillability, promising resorption potential and high mechanical strength confirm their suitability for use in clinical routine.},
  language  = {en}
}