@article{SteinertKunzPrageretal.2015, author = {Steinert, Andre F. and Kunz, Manuela and Prager, Patrick and G{\"o}bel, Sascha and Klein-Hitpass, Ludger and Ebert, Regina and N{\"o}th, Ulrich and Jakob, Franz and Gohlke, Frank}, title = {Characterization of bursa subacromialis-derived mesenchymal stem cells}, series = {Stem Cell Research \& Therapy}, volume = {6}, journal = {Stem Cell Research \& Therapy}, number = {114}, doi = {10.1186/s13287-015-0104-3}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-126446}, year = {2015}, abstract = {Introduction The bursa subacromialis (BS) provides the gliding mechanism of the shoulder and regenerates itself after surgical removal. Therefore, we explored the presence of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) within the human adult BS tissue and characterized the BS cells compared to MSCs from bone marrow (BMSCs) on a molecular level. Methods BS cells were isolated by collagenase digest from BS tissues derived from patients with degenerative rotator cuff tears, and BMSCs were recovered by adherent culture from bone-marrow of patients with osteoarthritis of the hip. BS cells and BMSCs were compared upon their potential to proliferate and differentiate along chondrogenic, osteogenic and adipogenic lineages under specific culture conditions. Expression profiles of markers associated with mesenchymal phenotypes were comparatively evaluated by flow cytometry, immunohistochemistry, and whole genome array analyses. Results BS cells and BMSCs appeared mainly fibroblastic and revealed almost similar surface antigen expression profiles, which was \(CD44^+, CD73^+, CD90^+, CD105^+, CD106^+\),\(STRO-1^+, CD14^-, CD31^-, CD34^- , CD45^-, CD144^-\). Array analyses revealed 1969 genes upregulated and 1184 genes downregulated in BS cells vs. BMSCs, indicating a high level of transcriptome similarity. After 3 weeks of differentiation culture, BS cells and BMSCs showed a similar strong chondrogenic, adipogenic and osteogenic potential, as shown by histological, immunohistochemical and RT-PCR analyses in contrast to the respective negative controls. Conclusions Our in vitro characterizations show that BS cells fulfill all characteristics of mesenchymal stem cells, and therefore merit further attention for the development of improved therapies for various shoulder pathologies.}, language = {en} } @article{WernerBoehmGohlke2013, author = {Werner, Birgit S. and Boehm, Dorota and Gohlke, Frank}, title = {Revision to reverse shoulder arthroplasty with retention of the humeral component Good outcome in 14 patients followed for a mean of 2.5 years}, series = {Acta Orthopaedica}, volume = {84}, journal = {Acta Orthopaedica}, number = {5}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-131621}, pages = {473-478}, year = {2013}, abstract = {Background: Revision in failed shoulder arthroplasty often requires removal of the humeral component with a significant risk of fracture and bone loss. Newer modular systems allow conversion from anatomic to reverse shoulder arthroplasty with retention of a well-fixed humeral stem. We report on a prospectively evaluated series of conversions from hemiarthroplasty to reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Methods: In 14 cases of failed hemiarthroplasty due to rotator cuff deficiency and painful pseudoparalysis (in 13 women), revision to reverse shoulder arthroplasty was performed between October 2006 and 2010, with retention of the humeral component using modular systems. Mean age at the time of operation was 70 (56-80) years. Pre- and postoperative evaluation followed a standardized protocol including Constant score, range of motion, and radiographic analysis. Mean follow-up time was 2.5 (2-5.5) years. Results: Mean Constant score improved from 9 (2-16) to 41 (17-74) points. Mean lengthening of the arm was 2.6 (0.9-4.7) cm without any neurological complications. One patient required revision due to infection. Interpretation Modular systems allow retainment of a well-fixed humeral stem with good outcome. There is a risk of excessive humeral lengthening.}, language = {en} } @article{SchmalzlPlumhoffGilbertetal.2019, author = {Schmalzl, Jonas and Plumhoff, Piet and Gilbert, Fabian and Gohlke, Frank and Konrads, Christian and Brunner, Ulrich and Jakob, Franz and Ebert, Regina and Steinert, Andre F.}, title = {Tendon-derived stem cells from the long head of the biceps tendon}, series = {Bone \& Joint Research}, volume = {8}, journal = {Bone \& Joint Research}, number = {9}, doi = {10.1302/2046-3758.89.BJR-2018-0214.R2}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-200370}, pages = {414-424}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Objectives The long head of the biceps (LHB) is often resected in shoulder surgery and could therefore serve as a cell source for tissue engineering approaches in the shoulder. However, whether it represents a suitable cell source for regenerative approaches, both in the inflamed and non-inflamed states, remains unclear. In the present study, inflamed and native human LHBs were comparatively characterized for features of regeneration. Methods In total, 22 resected LHB tendons were classified into inflamed samples (n = 11) and non-inflamed samples (n = 11). Proliferation potential and specific marker gene expression of primary LHB-derived cell cultures were analyzed. Multipotentiality, including osteogenic, adipogenic, chondrogenic, and tenogenic differentiation potential of both groups were compared under respective lineage-specific culture conditions. Results Inflammation does not seem to affect the proliferation rate of the isolated tendon-derived stem cells (TDSCs) and the tenogenic marker gene expression. Cells from both groups showed an equivalent osteogenic, adipogenic, chondrogenic and tenogenic differentiation potential in histology and real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis. Conclusion These results suggest that the LHB tendon might be a suitable cell source for regenerative approaches, both in inflamed and non-inflamed states. The LHB with and without tendinitis has been characterized as a novel source of TDSCs, which might facilitate treatment of degeneration and induction of regeneration in shoulder surgery.}, language = {en} } @article{BoelchStreckPlumhoffetal.2020, author = {Boelch, Sebastian Philipp and Streck, Laura Elisa and Plumhoff, Piet and Konrads, Christian and Gohlke, Frank and Rueckl, Kilian}, title = {Infection control and outcome of staged reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the management of shoulder infections}, series = {JSES International}, volume = {4}, journal = {JSES International}, doi = {10.1016/j.jseint.2020.08.012}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-230620}, pages = {959-963}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Background The treatment of septic arthritis, caused by either hematogenous seeding, injections, or surgery, can be challenging. Staged reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) with temporary implantation of an antibiotic-loaded spacer is widely accepted but still discussed controversially. This study investigated the shoulder-specific bacterial spectrum, infection control rate, functional outcome, and infection-free survival rate after staged RSA in the mid- to long-term follow-up. It was hypothesized that staged RSA would show a high infection-free survival rate. Methods A total of 39 patients treated with staged RSA for primary septic arthritis (n = 8), secondary infection (n = 8), or periprosthetic infection (n = 23) were retrospectively included. The infection control rate was calculated based on cultures taken intraoperatively at spacer removal and RSA implantation. Infection-free survival was defined as no revision due to infection. The minimum follow-up period for functional outcome assessment was 2 years (n = 14; mean, 76 months; range, 31-128 months). Results Cutibacterium (26\%) and coagulase-negative staphylococci (23\%) were the predominant pathogens. The infection control rate was 90\%. The cumulative infection-free survival rate was 91\% after 128 months. Follow-up examinations showed a mean Constant score of 48 (range, 7-85), a mean QuickDASH (short version of Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire) score of 40.0 (range, 11.4-93.3), and a mean pain score of 1.6 (range, 0-7). Conclusion Staged RSA implantation was confirmed to be a reliable treatment option for primary, secondary, and periprosthetic infections of the shoulder. The infection control rate and infection-free survival rate are satisfactory. However, patients and surgeons must be aware of functional impairment even after successful treatment of infections.}, language = {en} }