@phdthesis{Gschwendtner2013, author = {Gschwendtner, Kathrin M.}, title = {Von den Genen zum Verhalten: Der Einfluss des COMT Val158Met Polymorphismus auf visuell-r{\"a}umliche Aufmerksamkeitslenkung bei emotionalen Verarbeitungsprozessen}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-83278}, school = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg}, year = {2013}, abstract = {Der Catechol-O-Methyltransferase (COMT) Val158Met Polymorphismus (rs4680) ist am Abbau von Dopamin und Noradrenalin im menschlichen Gehirn beteiligt. In bisherigen Studien konnte gezeigt werden, dass das Met-Allel mit einer erh{\"o}hten Reaktivit{\"a}t auf negative Stimuli assoziiert ist. Auf Basis der Tonischen/ Phasischen Dopaminhypothese wird postuliert, dass diese erh{\"o}hte Reaktivit{\"a}t auf negative Reize durch defizit{\"a}re Disengagementprozesse verursacht sein k{\"o}nnte. Das Ziel dieser Arbeit war es daher, diese theoretische Annahme mithilfe von Blickbewegungsmessungen zu {\"u}berpr{\"u}fen und zu untersuchen, ob die erh{\"o}hte Reaktivit{\"a}t sich auch in verl{\"a}ngerten Disengagementlatenzen von negativen Reizen widerspiegelt. Es wurden daf{\"u}r drei Studien durchgef{\"u}hrt, in denen eine adaptierte Version der emotionalen Antisakkadenaufgabe in Verbindung mit einer Blickbewegungsmessung eingesetzt wurde. In der zweiten Studie wurde zus{\"a}tzlich eine EEG-Messung durchgef{\"u}hrt. Außerdem wurde in der dritten Studie die Aufmerksamkeitslokation manipuliert. In der ersten und zweiten Studie zeigte sich nicht wie erwartet ein linearer Effekt in Relation zum COMT Val158Met Polymorphismus, sondern ein Heterosiseffekt. Dieser Effekt zeigte sich nur in der einfacheren Prosakkadenbedingung. In der ersten Studie wurde der Heterosiseffekt bei negativen Reizen gefunden, wohingegen in der zweiten Studie der Heterosiseffekt nur in einer EEG- Komponente, der Early Posterior Negativity (EPN), aber sowohl bei positiven als auch negativen Reizen gefunden wurde. In der dritten Studie zeigte sich kein Genotypeffekt. Es wird vermutet, dass der COMT Effekt in der emotionalen Verarbeitung aufgabenspezifisch sein k{\"o}nnte und daher, neben linearen Zusammenh{\"a}ngen, unter bestimmten Umst{\"a}nden auch ein Heterosiseffekt auftreten kann. Die Ergebnisse sollten nicht auf eine m{\"a}nnliche Stichprobe generalisiert werden, da in allen Studien lediglich weibliche Versuchspersonen teilnahmen.}, subject = {Dopaminstoffwechsel}, language = {de} } @article{GlotzbachMuehlbergerGschwendtneretal.2011, author = {Glotzbach, Evelyn and M{\"u}hlberger, Andreas and Gschwendtner, Kathrin and Fallgatter, Andreas J and Pauli, Paul and Herrmann, Martin J}, title = {Prefrontal Brain Activation During Emotional Processing: A Functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy Study (fNIRS)}, series = {The Open Neuroimaging Journal}, volume = {5}, journal = {The Open Neuroimaging Journal}, doi = {10.2174/1874440001105010033}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-141714}, pages = {33-39}, year = {2011}, abstract = {The limbic system and especially the amygdala have been identified as key structures in emotion induction and regulation. Recently research has additionally focused on the influence of prefrontal areas on emotion processing in the limbic system and the amygdala. Results from fMRI studies indicate that the prefrontal cortex (PFC) is involved not only in emotion induction but also in emotion regulation. However, studies using fNIRS only report prefrontal brain activation during emotion induction. So far it lacks the attempt to compare emotion induction and emotion regulation with regard to prefrontal activation measured with fNIRS, to exclude the possibility that the reported prefrontal brain activation in fNIRS studies are mainly caused by automatic emotion regulation processes. Therefore this work tried to distinguish emotion induction from regulation via fNIRS of the prefrontal cortex. 20 healthy women viewed neutral pictures as a baseline condition, fearful pictures as induction condition and reappraised fearful pictures as regulation condition in randomized order. As predicted, the view-fearful condition led to higher arousal ratings than the view-neutral condition with the reappraise-fearful condition in between. For the fNIRS results the induction condition showed an activation of the bilateral PFC compared to the baseline condition (viewing neutral). The regulation condition showed an activation only of the left PFC compared to the baseline condition, although the direct comparison between induction and regulation condition revealed no significant difference in brain activation. Therefore our study underscores the results of previous fNIRS studies showing prefrontal brain activation during emotion induction and rejects the hypothesis that this prefrontal brain activation might only be a result of automatic emotion regulation processes.}, language = {en} } @article{HerrmannGlotzbachMuehlbergeretal.2011, author = {Herrmann, Martin J. and Glotzbach, Evelyn and M{\"u}hlberger, Andreas and Gschwendtner, Kathrin and Fallgatter, Andreas J. and Pauli, Paul}, title = {Prefrontal Brain Activation During Emotional Processing: A Functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy Study (fNIRS)}, series = {The Open Neuroimaging Journal}, journal = {The Open Neuroimaging Journal}, doi = {10.2174/1874440001105010033}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-97437}, year = {2011}, abstract = {The limbic system and especially the amygdala have been identified as key structures in emotion induction and regulation. Recently research has additionally focused on the influence of prefrontal areas on emotion processing in the limbic system and the amygdala. Results from fMRI studies indicate that the prefrontal cortex (PFC) is involved not only in emotion induction but also in emotion regulation. However, studies using fNIRS only report prefrontal brain activation during emotion induction. So far it lacks the attempt to compare emotion induction and emotion regulation with regard to prefrontal activation measured with fNIRS, to exclude the possibility that the reported prefrontal brain activation in fNIRS studies are mainly caused by automatic emotion regulation processes. Therefore this work tried to distinguish emotion induction from regulation via fNIRS of the prefrontal cortex. 20 healthy women viewed neutral pictures as a baseline condition, fearful pictures as induction condition and reappraised fearful pictures as regulation condition in randomized order. As predicted, the view-fearful condition led to higher arousal ratings than the view-neutral condition with the reappraise-fearful condition in between. For the fNIRS results the induction condition showed an activation of the bilateral PFC compared to the baseline condition (viewing neutral). The regulation condition showed an activation only of the left PFC compared to the baseline condition, although the direct comparison between induction and regulation condition revealed no significant difference in brain activation. Therefore our study underscores the results of previous fNIRS studies showing prefrontal brain activation during emotion induction and rejects the hypothesis that this prefrontal brain activation might only be a result of automatic emotion regulation processes.}, language = {en} }