@article{TamihardjaLawrenzLutyjetal.2022,
  author    = {Tamihardja, J{\"o}rg and Lawrenz, Ingulf and Lutyj, Paul and Weick, Stefan and Guckenberger, Matthias and Polat, B{\"u}lent and Flentje, Michael},
  title     = {Propensity score-matched analysis comparing dose-escalated intensity-modulated radiation therapy versus external beam radiation therapy plus high-dose-rate brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer},
  series = {Strahlentherapie und Onkologie},
  volume    = {198},
  journal   = {Strahlentherapie und Onkologie},
  number    = {8},
  doi       = {10.1007/s00066-022-01953-y},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-325055},
  pages     = {735-743},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Purpose Dose-escalated external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and EBRT + high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) boost are guideline-recommended treatment options for localized prostate cancer. The purpose of this study was to compare long-term outcome and toxicity of dose-escalated EBRT versus EBRT + HDR-BT boost. Methods From 2002 to 2019, 744 consecutive patients received either EBRT or EBRT + HDR-BT boost, of whom 516 patients were propensity score matched. Median follow-up was 95.3 months. Cone beam CT image-guided EBRT consisted of 33 fractions of intensity-modulated radiation therapy with simultaneous integrated boost up to 76.23 Gy (D\(_{Mean}\)). Combined treatment was delivered as 46 Gy (D\(_{Mean}\)) EBRT, followed by two fractions HDR-BT boost with 9 Gy (D\(_{90\\%}\)). Propensity score matching was applied before analysis of the primary endpoint, estimated 10-year biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS), and the secondary endpoints metastasis-free survival (MFS) and overall survival (OS). Prognostic parameters were analyzed by Cox proportional hazard modelling. Genitourinary (GU)/gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity evaluation used the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (v5.0). Results The estimated 10-year bRFS was 82.0\% vs. 76.4\% (p = 0.075) for EBRT alone versus combined treatment, respectively. The estimated 10-year MFS was 82.9\% vs. 87.0\% (p = 0.195) and the 10-year OS was 65.7\% vs. 68.9\% (p = 0.303), respectively. Cumulative 5‑year late GU ≥ grade 2 toxicities were seen in 23.6\% vs. 19.2\% (p = 0.086) and 5‑year late GI ≥ grade 2 toxicities in 11.1\% vs. 5.0\% of the patients (p = 0.002); cumulative 5‑year late grade 3 GU toxicity occurred in 4.2\% vs. 3.6\% (p = 0.401) and GI toxicity in 1.0\% vs. 0.3\% (p = 0.249), respectively. Conclusion Both treatment groups showed excellent long-term outcomes with low rates of severe toxicity.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{TamihardjaSchortmannLawrenzetal.2021,
  author    = {Tamihardja, J{\"o}rg and Schortmann, Max and Lawrenz, Ingulf and Weick, Stefan and Bratengeier, Klaus and Flentje, Michael and Guckenberger, Matthias and Polat, B{\"u}lent},
  title     = {Moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: updated long-term outcome and toxicity analysis},
  series = {Strahlentherapie und Onkologie},
  volume    = {197},
  journal   = {Strahlentherapie und Onkologie},
  issn      = {0179-7158},
  doi       = {10.1007/s00066-020-01678-w},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-232509},
  pages     = {124-132},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Purpose Evaluation of long-term outcome and toxicity of moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with simultaneous integrated boost treatment planning and cone beam CT-based image guidance for localized prostate cancer. Methods Between 2005 and 2015, 346 consecutive patients with localized prostate cancer received primary radiotherapy using cone beam CT-based image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IG-IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (IG-VMAT) with a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB). Total doses of 73.9 Gy (n = 44) and 76.2 Gy (n = 302) to the high-dose PTV were delivered in 32 and 33 fractions, respectively. The low-dose PTV received a dose (D95) of 60.06 Gy in single doses of 1.82 Gy. The pelvic lymph nodes were treated in 91 high-risk patients to 45.5 Gy (D95). Results Median follow-up was 61.8 months. The 5‑year biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS) was 85.4\% for all patients and 93.3, 87.4, and 79.4\% for low-, intermediate-, and high-risk disease, respectively. The 5‑year prostate cancer-specific survival (PSS) was 94.8\% for all patients and 98.7, 98.9, 89.3\% for low-, intermediate-, and high-risk disease, respectively. The 5‑year and 10-year overall survival rates were 83.8 and 66.3\% and the 5‑year and 10-year freedom from distant metastasis rates were 92.2 and 88.0\%, respectively. Cumulative 5‑year late GU toxicity and late GI toxicity grade ≥2 was observed in 26.3 and 12.1\% of the patients, respectively. Cumulative 5‑year late grade 3 GU/GI toxicity occurred in 4.0/1.2\%. Conclusion Moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy using SIB treatment planning and cone beam CT image guidance resulted in high biochemical control and survival with low rates of late toxicity.},
  language  = {en}
}