@article{LutzJaggiSchlatter1982,
  author    = {Lutz, Werner K. and Jaggi, W. and Schlatter, C.},
  title     = {Covalent binding of diethylstilbestrol to DNA in rat and hamster liver and kidney [Short Communication]},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-61066},
  year      = {1982},
  abstract  = {No abstract available},
  subject      = {Toxikologie},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{LutzJaggiLuethyetal.1980,
  author    = {Lutz, Werner K. and Jaggi, W. and L{\"u}thy, J. and Sagelsdorff, P. and Schlatter, C.},
  title     = {In vivo covalent binding of aflatoxin B\(_1\) and aflatoxin M\(_1\) to liver DNA of rat, mouse and pig},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-61097},
  year      = {1980},
  abstract  = {[\(^{14}\)C] Aflatoxin B\(_1\) (AFB\(_1\)) was isolated from cultures of Aspergillus parasiticus grown on [1-\(^{114}\)C] sodium acetate. Covalent binding of AFB1 to liver DNA of rat and mouse was determined 6-8 h afteroral administration. The effectiveness of covalent binding, expressedas DNA binding per dose in the units of a 'Covalent Binding Index' (CBI), (\(\mu\)mol aflatoxin/mol DNA nucleotides)/(mmol aflatoxin/kg animal), was found to be 10 400 for rats and 240 for mice. These CBI partly explain the different susceptibility of the two species for the incidence of hepatic tumors. The corresponding values for pig liver DN A, 24 and 48 h after oral administration, were found to be as high as 19 100 and 13 300. DNA-binding has not so far been reported for this species although it could represent an appropriate animal model for studies where a human-like gastrointestinal tract physiology is desirable. Aflatoxin M \(_1\) ( AFM\(_1\)) is a metabolite found in the milk of cows that have been fed AFB\(_1\)-contaminated diet. [\(^{14}\)C] AFM\(_1\) was also found to be produced by cultures of A. parasiticus giving a yield of about 0.3\% of the total aflatoxins. A test for covalent binding to rat liver DN A revealed a CBI of 2100 shoWing that AFM\(_1\) must also be regarded as a strong hepatocarcinogen. It is concluded that AFB\(_1\) contaminations should be avoided in dairy feed.},
  subject      = {Toxikologie},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{JaggiLutzLuethyetal.1980,
  author    = {Jaggi, W. and Lutz, Werner K. and L{\"u}thy, J. and Zweifel, U. and Schlatter, C.},
  title     = {In vivo covalent binding of aflatoxin metabolites isolated from animal tissue to rat-liver DNA},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-61101},
  year      = {1980},
  abstract  = {Ring-labelled [\(^{14}\)C)aflatoxin B\(_1\) (AFB\(_1\)), prepared by biosynthesis. or generally labelled [\(^3\)H]AFB\(_1\) was administered by oral gavage to young adult male rats. After 6 hr. the liver was removed and two fractions were isolated, namely macromolecules, which contamed about 3 \% of the initial dose of AFB\(_1\) radioactivity. and water-soluble, low-molecular aftatoxin conjugates containing about0·2\% of the administered radioactivity. These two fractions were administered orally to other rats in order to determine the potential of radioactive aftatoxin residues for covalent binding to DNA. Such binding can be used as an indicator for carcinogenic potency. Liver DNA was isolated 9-12 hr after admmistration of the aflatoxin derivatives and in no case was any radioactivity detected on the DNA. It can be deduced on the basis of the limit of detection of radioactivity on the DNA, that macromolecule bound AFB\(_1\) derivatives are at least 4000 times less active than AFB\(_1\) with respect to covalent binding to rat-liver DNA. and that the water-soluble conjugates are at least 100 times less potent than AFB, itself. It is concluded that the carcinogenic risk for humans who consume liver or meat. containing such aflatoxin residues is negligible when compared with the risk from intake of aftatoxins in other food items.},
  subject      = {Toxikologie},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{JaggiLutzSchlatter1979,
  author    = {Jaggi, W. and Lutz, Werner K. and Schlatter, C.},
  title     = {Comparative studies on the covalent binding of the carcinogen benzo(a)pyrene to DNA in various model systems},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-61131},
  year      = {1979},
  abstract  = {The covalent binding of tritiated benzo(a)pyrene (BP) to DNA has been determined in rat liver in vivo, in rat liver perfused in situ, after incubation of BP with liver single cells, with liver homogenate, with liver microsomes and DNA, with fibroblasts from a rat granulorna pouch, and with · 2 cell lines. Li ver single cells were found to be a valuable compromise between the rnost sensitive system (microsomal incubation of BP with DNA) and the biologically most relevant system (in vivo ).},
  subject      = {Toxikologie},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{JaggiLutzSchlatter1978,
  author    = {Jaggi, W. and Lutz, Werner K. and Schlatter, C.},
  title     = {Covalent binding of ethinylestradiol and estrone to rat liver DNA in vivo},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-61162},
  year      = {1978},
  abstract  = {Thecovalent bindingof [6,7-\(^3\)H]ethinylestradiol (EE)and [6,7-\(^3\)H]estrone (E) to liver DNA of 200 g female ratswas measured 8 h after the administration of 80 \(\mu\)g (9.2 mCi) estrogen by gavage. The binding is 1.5 for EE and 1.1 for E, expressedas binding to DNA/dose, in units of \(\mu\)mol hormonefmol DNA phosphate/mmole honnone/kg body wt. It is in the same order of magnitude as for benzene and about 10 000 tim es below the binding of typical liver carcinogens, such as aflatoxin B\(_1\) or N,N-dimethylnitrosamine.},
  subject      = {Toxikologie},
  language  = {en}
}