@article{LitovkinVanEyndeJoniauetal.2015,
  author    = {Litovkin, Kirill and Van Eynde, Aleyde and Joniau, Steven and Lerut, Evelyne and Laenen, Annouschka and Gevaert, Thomas and Gevaert, Olivier and Spahn, Martin and Kneitz, Burkhard and Gramme, Pierre and Helleputte, Thibault and Isebaert, Sofie and Haustermans, Karin and Bollen, Mathieu},
  title     = {DNA Methylation-Guided Prediction of Clinical Failure in High-Risk Prostate Cancer},
  series = {PLoS ONE},
  volume    = {10},
  journal   = {PLoS ONE},
  number    = {6},
  doi       = {10.1371/journal.pone.0130651},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-151705},
  pages     = {e0130651},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {Background Prostate cancer (PCa) is a very heterogeneous disease with respect to clinical outcome. This study explored differential DNA methylation in a priori selected genes to diagnose PCa and predict clinical failure (CF) in high-risk patients. Methods A quantitative multiplex, methylation-specific PCR assay was developed to assess promoter methylation of the APC, CCND2, GSTP1, PTGS2 and RARB genes in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue samples from 42 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia and radical prostatectomy specimens of patients with high-risk PCa, encompassing training and validation cohorts of 147 and 71 patients, respectively. Log-rank tests, univariate and multivariate Cox models were used to investigate the prognostic value of the DNA methylation. Results Hypermethylation of APC, CCND2, GSTP1, PTGS2 and RARB was highly cancer-specific. However, only GSTP1 methylation was significantly associated with CF in both independent high-risk PCa cohorts. Importantly, trichotomization into low, moderate and high GSTP1 methylation level subgroups was highly predictive for CF. Patients with either a low or high GSTP1 methylation level, as compared to the moderate methylation groups, were at a higher risk for CF in both the training (Hazard ratio [HR], 3.65; 95\% CI, 1.65 to 8.07) and validation sets (HR, 4.27; 95\% CI, 1.03 to 17.72) as well as in the combined cohort ( HR, 2.74; 95\% CI, 1.42 to 5.27) in multivariate analysis. Conclusions Classification of primary high-risk tumors into three subtypes based on DNA methylation can be combined with clinico-pathological parameters for a more informative risk-stratification of these PCa patients.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KneitzKalogirouSpahnetal.2013,
  author    = {Kneitz, Burkhard and Kalogirou, Charis and Spahn, Martin and Krebs, Markus and Joniau, Steven and Lerut, Evelyne and Burger, Maximilian and Scholz, Claus-J{\"u}rgen and Kneitz, Susanne and Riedmiller, Hubertus},
  title     = {MiR-205 Is Progressively Down-Regulated in Lymph Node Metastasis but Fails as a Prognostic Biomarker in High-Risk Prostate Cancer},
  series = {International Journal of Molecular Sciences},
  journal   = {International Journal of Molecular Sciences},
  doi       = {10.3390/ijms141121414},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-97321},
  year      = {2013},
  abstract  = {The treatment of high-risk prostate cancer (HRPCa) is a tremendous challenge for uro-oncologists. The identification of predictive moleculobiological markers allowing risk assessment of lymph node metastasis and systemic progression is essential in establishing effective treatment. In the current study, we investigate the prognostic potential of miR-205 in HRPCa study and validation cohorts, setting defined clinical endpoints for both. We demonstrate miR-205 to be significantly down-regulated in over 70\% of the HRPCa samples analysed and that reconstitution of miR-205 causes inhibition of proliferation and invasiveness in prostate cancer (PCa) cell lines. Additionally, miR-205 is increasingly down-regulated in lymph node metastases compared to the primary tumour indicating that miR-205 plays a role in migration of PCa cells from the original location into extraprostatic tissue. Nevertheless, down-regulation of miR-205 in primary PCa was not correlated to the synchronous presence of metastasis and failed to predict the outcome for HRPCa patients. Moreover, we found a tendency for miR-205 up-regulation to correlate with an adverse outcome of PCa patients suggesting a pivotal role of miR-205 in tumourigenesis. Overall, we showed that miR-205 is involved in the development and metastasis of PCa, but failed to work as a useful clinical biomarker in HRPCa. These findings might have implications for the use of miR-205 as a prognostic or therapeutic target in HRPCa.},
  language  = {en}
}