@article{WagnerWetzWiegeringetal.2021,
  author    = {Wagner, Johanna C. and Wetz, Anja and Wiegering, Armin and Lock, Johan F. and L{\"o}b, Stefan and Germer, Christoph-Thomas and Klein, Ingo},
  title     = {Successful surgical closure of infected abdominal wounds following preconditioning with negative pressure wound therapy},
  series = {Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery},
  volume    = {406},
  journal   = {Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery},
  number    = {7},
  issn      = {1435-2451},
  doi       = {10.1007/s00423-021-02221-w},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-267541},
  pages     = {2479-2487},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Purpose Traditionally, previous wound infection was considered a contraindication to secondary skin closure; however, several case reports describe successful secondary wound closure of wounds "preconditioned" with negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT). Although this has been increasingly applied in daily practice, a systematic analysis of its feasibility has not been published thus far. The aim of this study was to evaluate secondary skin closure in previously infected abdominal wounds following treatment with NPWT. Methods Single-center retrospective analysis of patients with infected abdominal wounds treated with NPWT followed by either secondary skin closure referenced to a group receiving open wound therapy. Endpoints were wound closure rate, wound complications (such as recurrent infection or hernia), and perioperative data (such as duration of NPWT or hospitalization parameters). Results One hundred ninety-eight patients during 2013-2016 received a secondary skin closure after NPWT and were analyzed and referenced to 67 patients in the same period with open wound treatment after NPWT. No significant difference in BMI, chronic immunosuppressive medication, or tobacco use was found between both groups. The mean duration of hospital stay was 30 days with a comparable duration in both patient groups (29 versus 33 days, p = 0.35). Interestingly, only 7.7\% of patients after secondary skin closure developed recurrent surgical site infection and in over 80\% of patients were discharged with closed wounds requiring only minimal outpatient wound care. Conclusion Surgical skin closure following NPWT of infected abdominal wounds is a good and safe alternative to open wound treatment. It prevents lengthy outpatient wound therapy and is expected to result in a higher quality of life for patients and reduce health care costs.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{AngerLockKleinetal.2022,
  author    = {Anger, Friedrich and Lock, Johan Friso and Klein, Ingo and Hartlapp, Ingo and Wiegering, Armin and Germer, Christoph-Thomas and Kunzmann, Volker and L{\"o}b, Stefan},
  title     = {Does concurrent cholestasis alter the prognostic value of preoperatively elevated CA19-9 serum levels in patients with pancreatic head adenocarcinoma?},
  series = {Annals of Surgical Oncology},
  volume    = {29},
  journal   = {Annals of Surgical Oncology},
  number    = {13},
  doi       = {10.1245/s10434-022-12460-w},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-323854},
  pages     = {8523-8533},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Background Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients with preoperative carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) serum levels higher than 500 U/ml are classified as biologically borderline resectable (BR-B). To date, the impact of cholestasis on preoperative CA19-9 serum levels in these patients has remained unquantified. Methods Data on 3079 oncologic pancreatic resections due to PDAC that were prospectively acquired by the German Study, Documentation and Quality (StuDoQ) registry were analyzed in relation to preoperative CA19-9 and bilirubin serum values. Preoperative CA19-9 values were adjusted according to the results of a multivariable linear regression analysis of pathologic parameters, bilirubin, and CA19-9 values. Results Of 1703 PDAC patients with tumor located in the pancreatic head, 420 (24.5 \%) presented with a preoperative CA19-9 level higher than 500 U/ml. Although receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis failed to determine exact CA19-9 cut-off values for prognostic indicators (R and N status), the T, N, and G status; the UICC stage; and the number of simultaneous vein resections increased with the level of preoperative CA19-9, independently of concurrent cholestasis. After adjustment of preoperative CA19-9 values, 18.5 \% of patients initially staged as BR-B showed CA19-9 values below 500 U/ml. However, the postoperative pathologic results for these patients did not change compared with the patients who had CA19-9 levels higher than 500 U/ml after bilirubin adjustment. Conclusions In this multicenter dataset of PDAC patients, elevation of preoperative CA19-9 correlated with well-defined prognostic pathologic parameters. Bilirubin adjustment of CA19-9 is feasible but does not affect the prognostic value of CA19-9 in jaundiced patients.},
  language  = {en}
}