@article{WernerKircherHiguchietal.2019,
  author    = {Werner, Rudolf A. and Kircher, Stefan and Higuchi, Takahiro and Kircher, Malte and Schirbel, Andreas and Wester, Hans-J{\"u}rgen and Buck, Andreas K. and Pomper, Martin G. and Rowe, Steven P. and Lapa, Constantin},
  title     = {CXCR4-directed imaging in solid tumors},
  series = {Frontiers in Oncology},
  volume    = {9},
  journal   = {Frontiers in Oncology},
  number    = {770},
  issn      = {2234-943X},
  doi       = {10.3389/fonc.2019.00770},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-195678},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Despite histological evidence in various solid tumor entities, available experience with CXCR4-directed diagnostics and endoradiotherapy mainly focuses on hematologic diseases. With the goal of expanding the application of CXCR4 theranostics to solid tumors, we aimed to elucidate the feasibility of CXCR4-targeted imaging in a variety of such neoplasms. Methods: Nineteen patients with newly diagnosed, treatment-na{\"i}ve solid tumors including pancreatic adenocarcinoma or neuroendocrine tumor, cholangiocarcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, renal cell carcinoma, ovarian cancer, and prostate cancer underwent [\(^{68}\)Ga]Pentixafor PET/CT. CXCR4-mediated uptake was assessed both visually and semi-quantitatively by evaluation of maximum standardized uptake values (SUV\(_{max}\)) of both primary tumors and metastases. With physiologic liver uptake as reference, tumor-to-background ratios (TBR) were calculated. [\(^{68}\)Ga]Pentixafor findings were further compared to immunohistochemistry and [\(^{18}\)F]FDG PET/CT. Results: On [\(^{68}\)Ga]Pentixafor PET/CT, 10/19 (52.6\%) primary tumors were visually detectable with a median SUVmax of 5.4 (range, 1.7-16.0) and a median TBR of 2.6 (range, 0.8-7.4), respectively. The highest level of radiotracer uptake was identified in a patient with cholangiocarcinoma (SUVmax, 16.0; TBR, 7.4). The relatively low uptake on [\(^{68}\)Ga]Pentixafor was also noted in metastases, exhibiting a median SUVmax of 4.5 (range, 2.3-8.8; TBR, 1.7; range, 1.0-4.1). A good correlation between uptake on [\(^{68}\)Ga]Pentixafor and histological derived CXCR4 expression was noted (R = 0.62, P < 0.05). In the 3 patients in whom [\(^{18}\)F]FDG PET/CT was available, [\(^{68}\)Ga]Pentixafor exhibited lower uptake in all lesions. Conclusions: In this cohort of newly diagnosed, treatment-na{\"i}ve patients with solid malignancies, CXCR4 expression as detected by [\(^{68}\)Ga]Pentixafor-PET/CT and immunohistochemistry was rather moderate. Thus, CXCR4-directed imaging may not play a major role in the management of solid tumors in the majority of patients.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{WernerDerlinLapaetal.2020,
  author    = {Werner, Rudolf A. and Derlin, Thorsten and Lapa, Constantin and Sheikbahaei, Sara and Higuchi, Takahiro and Giesel, Frederik L. and Behr, Spencer and Drzezga, Alexander and Kimura, Hiroyuki and Buck, Andreas K. and Bengel, Frank M. and Pomper, Martin G. and Gorin, Michael A. and Rowe, Steven P.},
  title     = {\(^{18}\)F-labeled, PSMA-targeted radiotracers: leveraging the advantages of radiofluorination for prostate cancer molecular imaging},
  series = {Theranostics},
  volume    = {10},
  journal   = {Theranostics},
  number    = {1},
  issn      = {1838-7640},
  doi       = {10.7150/thno.37894},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-202559},
  pages     = {1-16},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted PET imaging for prostate cancer with \(^{68}\)Ga-labeled compounds has rapidly become adopted as part of routine clinical care in many parts of the world. However, recent years have witnessed the start of a shift from \(^{68}\)Ga- to \(^{18}\)F-labeled PSMA-targeted compounds. The latter imaging agents have several key advantages, which may lay the groundwork for an even more widespread adoption into the clinic. First, facilitated delivery from distant suppliers expands the availability of PET radiopharmaceuticals in smaller hospitals operating a PET center but lacking the patient volume to justify an onsite \(^{68}\)Ge/\(^{68}\)Ga generator. Thus, such an approach meets the increasing demand for PSMA-targeted PET imaging in areas with lower population density and may even lead to cost-savings compared to in-house production. Moreover, \(^{18}\)F-labeled radiotracers have a higher positron yield and lower positron energy, which in turn decreases image noise, improves contrast resolution, and maximizes the likelihood of detecting subtle lesions. In addition, the longer half-life of 110 min allows for improved delayed imaging protocols and flexibility in study design, which may further increase diagnostic accuracy. Moreover, such compounds can be distributed to sites which are not allowed to produce radiotracers on-site due to regulatory issues or to centers without access to a cyclotron. In light of these advantageous characteristics, \(^{18}\)F-labeled PSMA-targeted PET radiotracers may play an important role in both optimizing this transformative imaging modality and making it widely available. We have aimed to provide a concise overview of emerging \(^{18}\)F-labeled PSMA-targeted radiotracers undergoing active clinical development. Given the wide array of available radiotracers, comparative studies are needed to firmly establish the role of the available \(^{18}\)F-labeled compounds in the field of molecular PCa imaging, preferably in different clinical scenarios.},
  language  = {en}
}