@article{LapaReiterKircheretal.2016,
  author    = {Lapa, Constantin and Reiter, Theresa and Kircher, Malte and Schirbel, Andreas and Werner, Rudolf A. and Pelzer, Theo and Pizarro, Carmen and Skowasch, Dirk and Thomas, Lena and Schlesinger-Irsch, Ulrike and Thomas, Daniel and Bundschuh, Ralph A. and Bauer, Wolfgang R. and Gartner, Florian C.},
  title     = {Somatostatin receptor based PET/CT in patients with the suspicion of cardiac sarcoidosis: an initial comparison to cardiac MRI},
  series = {Oncotarget},
  volume    = {7},
  journal   = {Oncotarget},
  number    = {47},
  doi       = {10.18632/oncotarget.12799},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-175423},
  pages     = {77807-77814},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis is often challenging. Whereas cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with \(^{18}\)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) are most commonly used to evaluate patients, PET/CT using radiolabeled somatostatin receptor (SSTR) ligands for visualization of inflammation might represent a more specific alternative. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of SSTR-PET/CT for detecting cardiac sarcoidosis in comparison to CMR. 15 patients (6 males, 9 females) with sarcoidosis and suspicion on cardiac involvement underwent SSTR-PET/CT imaging and CMR. Images were visually scored. The AHA 17-segment model of the left myocardium was used for localization and comparison of inflamed myocardium for both imaging modalities. In semi-quantitative analysis, mean (SUV\(_{mean}\)) and maximum standardized uptake values (SUV\(_{max}\)) of affected myocardium were calculated and compared with both remote myocardium and left ventricular (LV) cavity. SSTR-PET was positive in 7/15, CMR in 10/15 patients. Of the 3 CMR+/PET- subjects, one patient with minor involvement (<25\% of wall thickness in CMR) was missed by PET. The remaining two CMR+/PET- patients displayed no adverse cardiac events during follow-up. In the 17-segment model, PET/CT yielded 27 and CMR 29 positive segments. Overall concordance of the 2 modalities was 96.1\% (245/255 segments analyzed). SUV\(_{mean}\) and SUV\(_{max}\) in inflamed areas were 2.0±1.2 and 2.6±1.2, respectively. The lesion-to-remote myocardium and lesion-to-LV cavity ratios were 1.8±0.2 and 1.9±0.2 for SUV\(_{mean}\) and 2.0±0.3 and 1.7±0.3 for SUV\(_{max}\), respectively. Detection of cardiac sarcoidosis by SSTR-PET/CT is feasible. Our data warrant further analysis in larger prospective series.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{LapaKircherHaenscheidetal.2018,
  author    = {Lapa, Constantin and Kircher, Malte and H{\"a}nscheid, Heribert and Schirbel, Andreas and Grigoleit, G{\"o}tz Ulrich and Klinker, Erdwine and B{\"o}ck, Markus and Samnick, Samuel and Pelzer, Theo and Buck, Andreas K},
  title     = {Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy as a new tool in treatment-refractory sarcoidosis - initial experience in two patients},
  series = {Theranostics},
  volume    = {8},
  journal   = {Theranostics},
  number    = {3},
  doi       = {10.7150/thno.22161},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-158983},
  pages     = {644-649},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {Sarcoidosis is a multisystem granulomatous disorder of unknown etiology that can involve virtually all organ systems. Whereas most patients present without symptoms, progressive and disabling organ failure can occur in up to 10\% of subjects. Somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-directed peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) has recently received market authorization for treatment of SSTR-positive neuroendocrine tumors. Methods: We describe the first case series comprising two patients with refractory multi-organ involvement of sarcoidosis who received 4 cycles of PRRT. Results: PRRT was well-tolerated without any acute adverse effects. No relevant toxicities could be recorded during follow-up. Therapy resulted in partial response accompanied by a pronounced reduction in pain (patient \#1) and stable disease regarding morphology as well as disease activity (patient \#2), respectively. Conclusion: Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in sarcoidosis is feasible and might be a new valuable tool in patients with otherwise treatment-refractory disease. Given the long experience with and good tolerability of PRRT, further evaluation of this new treatment option for otherwise treatment-refractory sarcoidosis in larger patient cohorts is warranted.},
  language  = {en}
}