@phdthesis{Paknia2013, author = {Paknia, Elham}, title = {Identification of a quality control check-point for the assembly of mRNA-processing snRNPs}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-98744}, school = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg}, year = {2013}, abstract = {An essential step in eukaryotic gene expression is splicing, i.e. the excision of non-coding sequences from pre-mRNA and the ligation of coding-sequences. This reaction is carried out by the spliceosome, which is a macromolecular machine composed of small nuclear ribonucleoproteins (snRNPs) and a large number of proteins. Spliceosomal snRNPs are composed of one snRNA (or two in case of U4/6 snRNPs), seven common Sm proteins (SmD1, D2, D3, B, E, F, G) and several particle-specific proteins. The seven Sm proteins form a ring shaped structure on the snRNA, termed Sm core domain that forms a structural framework of all spliceosomal snRNPs. In the toroidal Sm core domain, the individual Sm proteins are arranged in the sequence SmE-SmG-SmD3-SmB- SmD1-SmD2-SmF from the first to the seventh nucleotide of the Sm site, respectively. The individual positions of Sm proteins in the Sm core domain are not interchangeable. snRNPs are formed in vivo in a step-wise process, which starts with the export of newly transcribed snRNA to the cytoplasm. Within this compartment, Sm proteins are synthesized and subsequently transferred onto the snRNA. Upon formation of the Sm core and further modifications of snRNA, the snRNP is imported into the nucleus to join the spliceosome. Prior to assembly into snRNPs, Sm proteins exist as specific hetero-oligomers in the cytoplasm. The association of these proteins with snRNA occurs spontaneously in vitro but requires the assistance of two major units, PRMT5- and SMN- complexes, in vivo. The early phase of assembly is critically influenced by the assembly chaperone pICln. This protein pre-organizes Sm proteins to functional building blocks and enables their recruitment onto the PRMT5 complex for methylation. Sm proteins are subsequently released from the PRMT5 complex as pICln bound entities and transferred onto the SMN-complex. The SMN complex then liberates the Sm proteins from the pICln-induced kinetic trap and allows their transfer onto the snRNA. Although the principal roles of SMN- and PRMT5 complexes in the assembly of snRNPs have been established, it is still not clear how newly translated Sm proteins are guided into the assembly line. In this thesis, I have uncovered a new facet of pICln function in the assembly of snRNPs. I have shown that newly synthesized Sm proteins are retained at the ribosome upon termination of translation. Their release is facilitated by pICln, which interacts with the cognate Sm protein hetero-oligomers at their site of synthesis on the ribosome and recruits them into the assembly pathway. Additionally, I have been able to show that the early engagement of pICln with the Sm proteins ensures the flawless oligomerization of Sm proteins and prevents any non-chaperoned release and diffusion of Sm proteins in the cytoplasm. In a second project, I have studied the mechanism of U7 snRNP assembly. This particle is a major component of the 3' end processing machinery of replication dependent histone mRNAs. A biochemical hallmark of U7 is its unique Sm core in which the two canonical Sm proteins D1 and D2 are replaced by so-called "like Sm proteins". The key question I addressed in my thesis was, how this "alternative" Sm core is assembled onto U7 snRNA. I have provided experimental evidence that the assembly route of U7 snRNPs and spliceosomal snRNPs are remarkably similar: The assembly of both particles depends on the same assembly factors and the mechanistic details are similar. It appears that formation of the U7- or spliceosomal- core specific 6S complex is the decisive step in assembly.}, subject = {Small nuclear RNP}, language = {en} }