@article{HeldBerzHensgenetal.2016,
  author    = {Held, Martina and Berz, Annuska and Hensgen, Ronja and Muenz, Thomas S. and Scholl, Christina and R{\"o}ssler, Wolfgang and Homberg, Uwe and Pfeiffer, Keram},
  title     = {Microglomerular Synaptic Complexes in the Sky-Compass Network of the Honeybee Connect Parallel Pathways from the Anterior Optic Tubercle to the Central Complex},
  series = {Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience},
  volume    = {10},
  journal   = {Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience},
  number    = {186},
  doi       = {10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00186},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-165080},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {While the ability of honeybees to navigate relying on sky-compass information has been investigated in a large number of behavioral studies, the underlying neuronal system has so far received less attention. The sky-compass pathway has recently been described from its input region, the dorsal rim area (DRA) of the compound eye, to the anterior optic tubercle (AOTU). The aim of this study is to reveal the connection from the AOTU to the central complex (CX). For this purpose, we investigated the anatomy of large microglomerular synaptic complexes in the medial and lateral bulbs (MBUs/LBUs) of the lateral complex (LX). The synaptic complexes are formed by tubercle-lateral accessory lobe neuron 1 (TuLAL1) neurons of the AOTU and GABAergic tangential neurons of the central body's (CB) lower division (TL neurons). Both TuLAL1 and TL neurons strongly resemble neurons forming these complexes in other insect species. We further investigated the ultrastructure of these synaptic complexes using transmission electron microscopy. We found that single large presynaptic terminals of TuLAL1 neurons enclose many small profiles (SPs) of TL neurons. The synaptic connections between these neurons are established by two types of synapses: divergent dyads and divergent tetrads. Our data support the assumption that these complexes are a highly conserved feature in the insect brain and play an important role in reliable signal transmission within the sky-compass pathway.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{HensgenEnglandHombergetal.2021,
  author    = {Hensgen, Ronja and England, Laura and Homberg, Uwe and Pfeiffer, Keram},
  title     = {Neuroarchitecture of the central complex in the brain of the honeybee: Neuronal cell types},
  series = {Journal of Comparative Neurology},
  volume    = {529},
  journal   = {Journal of Comparative Neurology},
  doi       = {10.1002/cne.24941},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-215566},
  pages     = {159-186},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {The central complex (CX) in the insect brain is a higher order integration center that controls a number of behaviors, most prominently goal directed locomotion. The CX comprises the protocerebral bridge (PB), the upper division of the central body (CBU), the lower division of the central body (CBL), and the paired noduli (NO). Although spatial orientation has been extensively studied in honeybees at the behavioral level, most electrophysiological and anatomical analyses have been carried out in other insect species, leaving the morphology and physiology of neurons that constitute the CX in the honeybee mostly enigmatic. The goal of this study was to morphologically identify neuronal cell types of the CX in the honeybee Apis mellifera. By performing iontophoretic dye injections into the CX, we traced 16 subtypes of neuron that connect a subdivision of the CX with other regions in the bee's central brain, and eight subtypes that mainly interconnect different subdivisions of the CX. They establish extensive connections between the CX and the lateral complex, the superior protocerebrum and the posterior protocerebrum. Characterized neuron classes and subtypes are morphologically similar to those described in other insects, suggesting considerable conservation in the neural network relevant for orientation.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{NguyenBeetzMerlinetal.2022,
  author    = {Nguyen, Tu Anh Thi and Beetz, M. Jerome and Merlin, Christine and Pfeiffer, Keram and el Jundi, Basil},
  title     = {Weighting of celestial and terrestrial cues in the monarch butterfly central complex},
  series = {Frontiers in Neural Circuits},
  volume    = {16},
  journal   = {Frontiers in Neural Circuits},
  issn      = {1662-5110},
  doi       = {10.3389/fncir.2022.862279},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-279445},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Monarch butterflies rely on external cues for orientation during their annual long-distance migration from Northern US and Canada to Central Mexico. These external cues can be celestial cues, such as the sun or polarized light, which are processed in a brain region termed the central complex (CX). Previous research typically focused on how individual simulated celestial cues are encoded in the butterfly's CX. However, in nature, the butterflies perceive several celestial cues at the same time and need to integrate them to effectively use the compound of all cues for orientation. In addition, a recent behavioral study revealed that monarch butterflies can rely on terrestrial cues, such as the panoramic skyline, for orientation and use them in combination with the sun to maintain a directed flight course. How the CX encodes a combination of celestial and terrestrial cues and how they are weighted in the butterfly's CX is still unknown. Here, we examined how input neurons of the CX, termed TL neurons, combine celestial and terrestrial information. While recording intracellularly from the neurons, we presented a sun stimulus and polarized light to the butterflies as well as a simulated sun and a panoramic scene simultaneously. Our results show that celestial cues are integrated linearly in these cells, while the combination of the sun and a panoramic skyline did not always follow a linear integration of action potential rates. Interestingly, while the sun and polarized light were invariantly weighted between individual neurons, the sun stimulus and panoramic skyline were dynamically weighted when both stimuli were simultaneously presented. Taken together, this dynamic weighting between celestial and terrestrial cues may allow the butterflies to flexibly set their cue preference during navigation.},
  language  = {en}
}